WVU president vows to have football in the fall, even if he has to play

Getty Images

The NFL is determined to play in 2020. College football is, too. And those responsible for college football may be even more determined to play than previously believed.

“We are going to play football in the fall, I really do believe that,” West Virginia University president Gordon Gee said recently on WOWK-TV. “Even if I have to suit up.”

Gee is 76. If he does indeed suit up, there’s a good chance Notre Dame will contact WVU about adding the Irish to the Mountaineers’ schedule this year.

“We’re going to do it based on what is safe, what is healthy for our fans, what is healthy for our student-athletes,” Gee added. “But I do believe that we will play football.”

Before there can be college football, there has to be college — on open campuses. Recently, NCAA president Mark Emmert made that clear. However, the question of what amounts to an open campus could be the subject of flexibility and interpretation.

If colleges play football with campuses closed, colleges will have an even harder time staving off the inevitable reckoning that will force them to pay football players a fair wage for the revenue they generate. Thus, look for the phrase “open campus” to be defined liberally, and for teams that hope to preserve the revenue they’ll realize from playing to find a way to put players on the field.

For its part, the NFL prefers that college football season proceed as scheduled. If it doesn’t, however, the league could try to shift some games from Sundays to Saturdays.

14 responses to “WVU president vows to have football in the fall, even if he has to play

  1. Bottom line, we have to get back to living life. There is no perfect fix, but shutting down the world is causing more harm than good.

  2. The bottom line is that the US have more cases/deaths than anyone in the world. We are leading the world in the wrong way. It’s not easy to live this life, but the trade-off is to deal with this now, instead of having is worse later. That may mean no football for a year. It absolutely sucks, but we cannot put medical personnel through this again. They might not respond the way they have so far.

  3. A growing list of major colleges (including several in the Big 12) have basically already promised there’ll be in-person classes in the fall in some capacity. If the campuses are open they’ll be playing football. Possibly without fans (or with limited attendance) but games will be taking place to keep the TV revenue coming in.

  4. “There is no perfect fix, but shutting down the world is causing more harm than good.”
    ___________

    Perhaps you would like to explain how millions of deaths are more good than harm.

  5. dburr10085 says:

    The bottom line is that the US have more cases/deaths than anyone in the world.
    ——————–
    Throw the European Union together as a group of states like America is and they crush our numbers in total cases. Its all relevant.

    However, as more testing is done its becoming clearer how low the fatality rate really is for this virus. The death rate is pushing .01% in infected cases and will keep dropping with more testing. Fact.

  6. “However, as more testing is done its becoming clearer how low the fatality rate really is for this virus. The death rate is pushing .01% in infected cases and will keep dropping with more testing. Fact.”
    _________

    That is definitely not a fact. Try getting your statistics from a reliable source, like Johns Hopkins.

    80,000+ deaths in the US thus far. How many deaths are ghouls like you willing to accept?

  7. funny how terrified people were of ebola (2 deaths), yet the same people are saying we have to go back to living with covid19 (85k deaths). What changed?

  8. “However, as more testing is done its becoming clearer how low the fatality rate really is for this virus. The death rate is pushing .01% in infected cases and will keep dropping with more testing. Fact.”

    Here’s a fact for you. India: 17.5% of the world population. 2500 deaths.
    USA: 4.5% of world population 86,000 deaths.

  9. “However, as more testing is done its becoming clearer how low the fatality rate really is for this virus. The death rate is pushing .01% in infected cases and will keep dropping with more testing. Fact.”

    Here’s a fact for you. India: 17.5% of the world population. 2500 deaths.
    USA: 4.5% of world population 86,000 deaths.

    _______________________________-

    These are both right. The US has far too many infections/deaths. The actual death rate is very low. The bad part is that it spreads very easy – therefore almost negating the low rate due to the high overall count.

  10. There are 7 known human Coronoaviruses and they all vary in risk factor. Some can kill more than 30% of those infected, such as MERS-CoV, and some are relatively harmless, such as the COMMON COLD. After decades of research, trial and error, there are yet to be vaccines or antiviral drugs to prevent or treat ANY human coronavirus infections. Fact. Either learn to deal with this coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) or stay inside for the rest of your life. Since over 99% of people will either have no symptoms or mild symptoms (See Dr. Anthony Fauci’s editorial in the March 26th edition of the New England Journal of Medicine) it seems silly to me to stay inside forever unless you have a seriously compromised immune system. And even if there is some vaccine years down the road, it will not be 100% effective. No vaccine is. According to the W.H.O “Most routine childhood vaccines are effective for 85% to 95% of recipients.” See, science is cool. Be brave. Live life.

  11. HagemeisterPark says:
    May 14, 2020 at 1:15 pm
    Bottom line, we have to get back to living life. There is no perfect fix, but shutting down the world is causing more harm than good.

    ******************************************************************************

    The intent IS to get back to living life. Nobody wants social distancing and economic hibernation to be permanent. I don’t know why people keep trying to argue otherwise.

    The key is going back in a deliberate, planful manner once the necessary infrastructure (e.g., testing, contact tracing, equipment for healthcare workers and first responders) is in place. Otherwise, you just run the risk of things spiraling again and going back to lockdown. That infrastructure is not in place in many parts of the country yet.

    I’d rather have to go on with social distancing now for 3-4 months (or however long) at the get go than do it for two months, try to reopen, more uncontrollable outbreaks after a few weeks or a month, and then have to go back into isolation again for the appropriate length like we should’ve the first time. It’s like a yo-yo, and no one wants the yo-yo. Just ask Larry David.

  12. West Virginia ranks 44th in education and 45th in public health. Yeah let’s take advice from these guys.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.