DeAndre Baker, Quinton Dunbar cases could get very interesting

Getty Images

Giants cornerback Deandre Baker and Seahawks cornerback Quinton Dunbar face serious charges arising from allegations of an armed robbery at a private party. Proving those charges may not be easy for prosecutors.

The affidavit supporting the arrest warrants, as prepared by Detective Mark Moretti, tells the detailed story of a robbery perpetrated by both men, with the names of the witnesses redacted. Some or all of those witnesses apparently have recanted, in affidavits harvested by the lawyers representing the defendants.

At Sunday’s bail hearing, Dunbar’s lawyer reportedly presented five affidavits that came from the same persons who were interviewed by police — four victims and one witness. The prosecutor found it “suspect” that the witnesses changed their tunes so quickly, and that their affidavits spoke directly to Dunbar’s role, or lack thereof, in the alleged crime.

The circumstances justify investigation as to both the harvesting of the witness statements by police and the creation of the affidavits. As a lawyer will ask (or at least imply) when confronting a witness with inconsistent statements, “Were you lying then or are you lying now?”

The witnesses, if lying in the affidavits, could face perjury charges. If they lied to the police, they face potential liability for that. If the police coerced them into lying about Baker and Dunbar, the police face potentially serious problems. If someone induced the witnesses, with rewards or threats, to change their stories, that’s another set of problems — if it can be proven.

These are issues that need to be fully developed as the cases begin to unfold. The dramatic shift in the witness statements didn’t happen randomly or accidentally. Something caused the first version to be false or the second version to be false. In the interests of justice, the statements need to be reconciled.

8 responses to “DeAndre Baker, Quinton Dunbar cases could get very interesting

  1. Could use the movie
    “the godfather” as a reference. Sounds like some offers that can’t be refused were made…

  2. So how did Dunbar’s attorney know who to contact to get the affidavits ? If Dunbar told him then wouldn’t that lend credibility to the police version of events ? Point being if told there was a warrant for his arrest how would Dunbar know who the attorney needed to contact unless he was there to see the events unfold . If there it seems highly unlikely the witnesses would somehow mistake him for the actual criminal .

  3. “The prosecutor found it “suspect” that the witnesses changed their tunes so quickly, and that their affidavits spoke directly to Dunbar’s role, or lack thereof, in the alleged crime.”

    Sounds like all charges will be dropped.

  4. Florida prosecutors trumping up charges and jumping all over a celebrity case to get in front of the cameras?

    I don’t think we’ve seen that before.

  5. Very fishy when every witness has changed their tune. Major credibility issues.

    This case gets tossed.

  6. Witnesses got paid before the Prosecution could get dirt on the witnesses compelling them to make an official statement.

    If Baker and Dunbar followed the Cris Carter school of being athlete, they have their Fall Guys lined up.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.