Defenseless player protections may be extended for kick returners

Getty Images

NFL owners will vote this week on a rule proposal that will expand the definition of “defenseless” players to include punt and kickoff returners even after they have caught the kick.

The proposal, which was put forward by the Competition Committee and will be voted upon by the owners, expands defenseless player protection to a kickoff or punt returner who is in possession of the ball but has not had time to avoid or ward off an opponent.

Defenseless players are protected from forcible hits to the head or neck area, hits from an opponent who lowers his helmet to make forcible contact, and hits from an opponent who launches into him. Kickoff and punt returners are already considered defenseless when they are attempting to field a kick that is in the air. But this proposal would extend the “defenseless” definition to include a returner “who has not had time to clearly become a runner.”

In other words, a return man can’t be drilled the moment he catches the ball. Instead, he has to have the ball long enough to give himself a chance to protect himself in some way, such as moving out of the way or giving a stiff arm.

NFL owners almost always support player safety rules that the Competition Committee has recommended, so this one seems like a safe bet to pass.

38 responses to “Defenseless player protections may be extended for kick returners

  1. Here we go again.

    Hopefully this rule will contain specific language about what it takes to “clearly become a runner”. Otherwise, this will be just another vague rule that will be interpreted badly and adversely effect the outcome of a game.

  2. Anybody else feel like the game would be a lot better and more fun to watch if the competition committee would just go away?

  3. Just don’t try to intentionally hurt the guy if he made the mistake of not calling a fair catch. It’s still legal to tackle him. The rule is fine.

  4. I’ve been ok with pretty much all the player safety rules so far, but this one is a bridge too far. As someone else mentioned, that’s what a fair catch is for. Eliminating the bang-bang hit here is just stupid and changes the dynamic of the play too much IMO as forcing a drop/fumble is such an integral part of the game.

  5. Chain Snatcher says: “It’s called a FAIR CATCH. What are we doing to the game?”
    ———————————-

    There’s no FAIR CATCH on kickoff returns. It’s a LIVE BALL.

    As for “what are we doing to the game”, it’s called adapting or get marginalized. Parents are not going to let their kids play contact football if safety is not ADDRESSED NOW.

  6. darrenkod says:
    May 24, 2020 at 4:57 pm
    Chain Snatcher says: “It’s called a FAIR CATCH. What are we doing to the game?”
    ———————————-

    There’s no FAIR CATCH on kickoff returns. It’s a LIVE BALL.

    As for “what are we doing to the game”, it’s called adapting or get marginalized. Parents are not going to let their kids play contact football if safety is not ADDRESSED NOW.
    ——————–
    Obviously you haven’t seen a pooch kick. As far as parents go, football has to stop spreading fear by constantly bringing up concussions. We all know that the only thing that started all of the safety concerns is the lawsuits that became a moneygrab. Parents don’t keep their kids from driving because of the risk that they might get in a serious wreck. But if they are shown videos of car crashes everyday, then there would be panick over that also. People just need a reality check.

  7. Chain Snatcher says:
    May 24, 2020 at 4:35 pm
    It’s called a FAIR CATCH. What are we doing to the game?
    ———————————————————–

    Actually, this sounds more like a halo rule.

  8. Another fake rule in the name of “player safety” whose real intention is another artificial closing of the gap in the name of parity.

    The more they reduce the effectiveness and importance of special teams, the more the award the lousy owners who refuse to put a winner on the field.

  9. That’s super, add another subjective rule that each official will interpret differently. Why would any returner ever call for a fair catch when nobody can touch him until he’s made the catch AND made a couple moves with the ball secured?

  10. If the NFL wants defenseless player protection to work, they should look at baseball. When a pitcher throws an intentional beanball, an umpire will eject the manager along with the offending player.

    I’m guessing that having to make a long walk up the tunnel with an also-ejected Belichick/Tomlin/Gruden/etc would serve as a deterrant to reckless play.

  11. The infamous “football move” coming back to the rulebook after the briefest of departures.

  12. darrenkod says:
    May 24, 2020 at 4:57 pm
    Chain Snatcher says: “It’s called a FAIR CATCH. What are we doing to the game?”
    ———————————-

    There’s no FAIR CATCH on kickoff returns. It’s a LIVE BALL.

    As for “what are we doing to the game”, it’s called adapting or get marginalized. Parents are not going to let their kids play contact football if safety is not ADDRESSED NOW.

    ____________

    Darren is absolutely right and there are also no fair catches on kickoff returns because there will never be a bang-bang play with a returner fielding a ball in the end zone or on the 20 with a squib for that sake….. a human just can’t get down the field that fast to make a hit, period.. Punts are different.. the fair catch rule addressed guys getting killed on punt returns. It’s enough – sucked when it happened…. Part of me thinks your are attempting sarcasm and I’m missing it.. I hope so..

  13. A grown man, supposed to be a tough guy, in full pads and helmet is “defenseless”. I literally had it tougher in pee wee.

  14. You can brush up against the player as long as he ok with it. If he is comfortable with the touch, he can ask the referee to throw a flag. Football 2020 style.

  15. finfanjim says:
    May 24, 2020 at 6:31 pm
    Punters with great hang time will now be sought after.
    ………………………….
    When weren’t they sought after??

  16. Actually it may replace some of the excitement lost with the changes to protect players. A kick returner would have a split second more to make a return without risking being leveled. That extra split second’s difference may allow a returner to try a return rather than the safer but boring fair catch. The devil is in the details. Can the league craft rules that make for consistent calls? Worth exploring.

  17. Seems more and more like this page will end up being the xfltalk.nbc.com. This league is getting softer by the minute. Just like the covid-9, if you don’t want to play, stay home. Quit ruining it for the rest of us.

  18. This rule will encourage punt returners to forego the fair catch more often in hopes of drawing a penalty.

  19. Its time to do away with the kick return entirely. Go watch Concussion, its an excellent film that shows how dangerous the play is. The NFL either gets smart about protecting the brains of their product, or they can keep seeing their star players retire in their 20s to protect their health. The NFL, like America, needs to change with the times, or it will continue to decay and decline to irrelevancy.

  20. Instead of using Steve Tasker’s highlight films for the Hall of Fame (which he should be in) they will be using them as examples of penalties now…just plain sad!

  21. Institute the Canadian Football rule. There’s no fair catch, but they strictly enforce the 5 yard halo…

  22. Can’t wait to see one of the owners who votes for this have his team get burned by a punt return TD after a player that could have dropped the returner on the spot misses the tackle because he has to pull up to avoid the penalty…

  23. So there goes the fair catch rule down the drain.
    Why would you fair catch when you know the player on defense can’t hit you until you have caught the ball and can make a football move,…. right ???
    A defensive player will be penalized for perfectly timing the catch and the hit.
    In 10 years they’ll be playing Flag Football at this rate.

  24. Great idea— long overdue. It actually might reduce the number of fair catches and make the game more exciting. Fair catches are boring.

  25. I don’t recall a kickoff where a returner doesn’t have time to get going. So no need for this rule. As for punt returns, there is the fair catch. Only place I could see this being used unfairly is an onside kick

  26. kenmasters34 says:
    May 24, 2020 at 5:36 pm
    I miss the XFL more every day.

    55 4 Rate This
    _______________________

    Same, but I think there might still be reason left to hope it comes back. I can’t see why McMahon would ask stadiums the XFL used for games to renew their leases otherwise.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.