NFL stops short of saying exactly what the players wanted

Getty Images

The fact that the NFL so quickly and convincingly responded to Thursday night’s video from players was jarring, and inspiring. It was the finest moment of Commissioner Roger Goodell, one in which on behalf of the league he seemingly capitulated to every demand made by the players.

On closer inspection, the NFL stopped short.

As noted by J.A. Adande, a former ESPN personality who now serves as the Director of Sports Journalism at Northwestern’s Medill School, there was a key difference between what the players wanted and what the Commissioner provided. The players wanted to league to admit that it was “wrong in silencing our players.” Goodell admitted only that the league was “wrong for not listening.”

Adande speculates that the adjustment may have something to do with concerns that, by admitting that they silenced players, the league could be assuming potential liability to Colin Kaepernick. His collusion lawsuit, as Adande notes, was settled. In theory, however, Kaepernick could bring another lawsuit for the ongoing cold shoulder he continues to receive since the settlement of the first lawsuit, given that the settlement did not extinguish future employment rights. Admitting that the league “silenced” players would make it harder for the NFL to win round two, if there ever is one.

There’s surely a P.R. component to the adjustment as well. Liability or not, not listening is passive while silencing is active. The league surely doesn’t want to admit that it took active steps to shut protesting players up.

Whether the league did or didn’t take such steps remains open for debate. The league office’s position always was, and still is, that players have the right to protest during the anthem, thanks to a donut hole in the league’s anthem policy that does not compel standing — and that the league and the union have not yet closed it via collective bargaining. Some would say that the teams separately have tried to silence players, whether by keeping those who would kneel in the tunnel during the anthem or by sheer force of will.

Regardless, the final score on the test wasn’t 100. It was more like a 97. And those three points that were lost represent a very important aspect of the potential debates, discussions, and arguments to come between players and teams if more players plan to kneel and if teams, fearful of the impact on ticket sales and ratings and Presidential tweets, try to come up with ways to get them to stand.

Although Goodell encourages players to “peacefully protest” during the video, some owners may try to reserve the right to say “you can protest all you want, just not during the anthem.” That may have done the trick for some teams and coaches in 2017 and 2018, but anyone who is watching closely to current events will quickly realize that, post-George Floyd, this approach won’t work.

15 responses to “NFL stops short of saying exactly what the players wanted

  1. You want to know why the fight for equality will never end? This story is why. No matter what happens, it will NEVER be enough.

  2. Would anyone truly miss the NFL if they do not play this year. All this crap over kneeling when we should ask what has it done. What has any of these players done in the community to make any change. Because if they had it would be all over the internet. All this feelings sorry for a QB that took a stance and it backfired on him.

  3. Didn’t Jerry Jones threaten that any player kneeling during the anthem wouldn’t play for Dallas anymore? That’s a very active move.

  4. This countries demographic is being punched in the balls. Good luck fixing this mess-

  5. Sad what the media is doing. Pushing a narrative. I love football, however I will not watch this year if the kneeling happens during the anthem. Protest on your own time. Give back to your community, be there for the kids, and for Pete’s sake just respect everyone. It’s not that hard.

  6. Haha, the people posting here so far are mostly whiny little conservative snow flakes on the wrong side of history. They must feel soooooo oppressed

  7. They couldn’t have admitted to “silencing their players”, because that would give rise to legal claims of violation of the various players’ civil rights.

  8. The NFL screw up when they let a guy with his right to protest on his employer time. The bottom line is take your feelings somewhere else. The fans go to watch football’ and not protest. Bill

  9. ravenhawks says:
    June 6, 2020 at 3:58 pm

    They couldn’t have admitted to “silencing their players”, because that would give rise to legal claims of violation of the various players’ civil rights.

    Also, because they didn’t silence their players.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.