Patrick Mahomes’ contract raises plenty of questions

Getty Images

The Patrick Mahomes contract, a stunning 10-year extension reportedly worth more than $400 million in new money, raises more questions than it answers. Let’s start exploring what needs to be known in order to properly value the deal.

First, what’s the signing bonus? That’s the only sure thing in any of the deals.

Second, how much is fully guaranteed at signing, and how many years does it cover? After the fully-guaranteed payments expire, every contract becomes a one-way deal, with the team holding an annual option to continue the relationship. Put simply, at that point the player is tied to the team but the team isn’t tied to the player.

Third, does the contract guarantee Mahomes a percentage of the salary cap? Some in league circles believe that the deal only makes sense for Mahomes if he secured that kind of protection against the hard dollars being rendered obsolete by the growth of the cap and the ongoing evolution of the quarterback market. Really, there’s no reason for Mahomes to commit to that long of a stay without that kind of financial protection.

Fourth, is it a true 10-year extension? Plenty of deals have dummy years on the back end that become automatically voided. Those details are hidden at first, in order to give the deal maximum impact when the news initially breaks. A prime example of this includes the 2011 Mike Vick extension in Philadelphia. The supposed six-year, $100 million contract looked good on paper, but it had a final year that definitely was going to evaporate before the sixth year ever happened, making it in reality a far less impressive five-year, $80 million deal.

Thus, like every other long-term deal, the devil lurks in the details. For Mahomes’ sake, here’s hoping the details include a guaranteed cap percentage and/or a couple of years on the back end that automatically will void.

32 responses to “Patrick Mahomes’ contract raises plenty of questions

  1. Chiefs done regardless. Chris Jones has to be dealt. They are way, way over the cap overnight.

  2. Regardless of the details, I’m fairly sure he’ll be just fine financially for a while

  3. He deserves a big splash deal but 10 years is a long time for both sides. In 3 to 4 years it won’t look so pretty.

  4. If you give me 80 million bucks, I don’t mind being short-changed 20 mil. lol

  5. In 10 years, if this only averages 40 million a year, it will look really team friendly with how the cap normally grows.

  6. You’ll know soon enough inspector, chill. This is Patrick freaking mahomes, he kinda has all the leverage in the world. His signing bonus and guaranteed years will be sufficient enough, let’s try not to get in to some sort of tizzy over an agreement the best player surely is going to be coming out on the right side of..

  7. Cap hell? Whatever! There is no data that supports these maga QB deals ruins team SB chances.
    People always complain how Flacco’s deal ruined their team. I remember Tom Brady, BB, a missed FGs and a dropped TD messing with the Ravens’ SB chances, not the Flacco contract.

  8. I think if he wins another Superbowl or more, his endorsements will keep his bank account well stocked for the rest of his life

  9. If signing bonus is the only sure thing in the contract then what are the fully guaranteed payments?

  10. Why would a team agree to a deal that has a percentage of the cap clause for 10 years?
    Far better to just have a series of 4-5 year contracts.
    You can always bail if it makes sense instead of being locked in a 10 year deal.

  11. partmachine says:
    July 6, 2020 at 4:44 pm
    He deserves a big splash deal but 10 years is a long time for both sides. In 3 to 4 years it won’t look so pretty.

    =========

    Set aside this year due to the pandemic; in about 5 years it may not be pretty, but absolutely gorgeous looking when, oh I don’t know, Sam Darnold starts thinking he’s got to be the richest man in the league.

  12. Gotta love the ‘in 6 years 40-45 million a year will be a bargain’ comments. It’s the tried and true way for a teams fans to feel good about a huge contract signed by a player that could kill a team’s title potential.

  13. ” I remember Tom Brady, BB, a missed FGs and a dropped TD messing with the Ravens’ SB chances, not the Flacco contract.”

    Then you might remember Flacco hadn’t been paid yet.

    Only 1 of the league’s 32 starting QBs wins the SB in a given year, so the people yammering about salary cap money are just playing the percentages.

  14. 10 years is a loooong time.
    Seems as though just 4 or 5 years ago Kaepernick was the new secret “dynasty builder”.
    How’d you like to be the 49ers GM standing there now and looking at 5 more years of Kaepernick at $20-25M per?

  15. Way to much for a guy that struggled on the big stage if Jimmy hit his target its a whole different ballgame

  16. I’m guessing they’re looking at guys like Brady, Brees, Rivers, Rodgers, Manning, Roethlisberger, etc., and thinking – 10 years looks like a lot right now, but that’s only 2/3 or less of a lot of those other guys’ careers. And they’re wagering that their guy is going to remain on those other guys’ levels.

    So there are some reasonable assumptions there. What I worry about is a deal for an incredible outlier (like Mahomes) becoming a point of reference for all the regular guys. So, if Mahomes gets a percentage of the cap – which may seem reasonable for him – then lesser QBs will want the same, then lesser players at other positions, and before you know it you’ve got dozens of teams hobbled from getting better because an outlier deal was used as the standard (see: Gurley’s crazy deal inflating expectations for RBs).

  17. tempests says:
    July 6, 2020 at 5:17 pm

    ” I remember Tom Brady, BB, a missed FGs and a dropped TD messing with the Ravens’ SB chances, not the Flacco contract.”

    Then you might remember Flacco hadn’t been paid yet.

    Only 1 of the league’s 32 starting QBs wins the SB in a given year, so the people yammering about salary cap money are just playing the percentages.
    _________________________^

    Actually, you’re right, Flacco hadn’t been paid yet. But it’s not the cap room you have, it’s what you do with money you have and the talent of the players you sign.

  18. Agree, devil is in the details. If it’s 11 years $450 million it can’t be all guaranteed, no way. Is there an opt out clause down the line? Signing bonus? Lots of questions for sure.

  19. the obsession over someone else’s money never ends. it’s like the guy and his agent arent smart enough to get what they want. he’s going to make a fortune and the chiefs locked up the best young qb in the league – they’re all happy. now go tie your own contract to an inflation index or whatever and find another crusade. no! not that one! anything but that one!

  20. For a QB that throws a lot of deep balls (needs time) and one who runs, this is an awfully long contract. Not saying if he goes injury free he isn’t worth it but a pretty risky gambit for his style of play.

  21. I hate to break it to you all, but the salary cap is going to be higher this year than it will be for at least the next 3 years… With the way things are going I would sign anything I can now.

  22. Like the questions Gruden and Mayock are asking….

    Get ready for another decade of NO postseason Raider’s fans.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.