NFL, NFLPA still have major issues to negotiate

Getty Images

The NFL and NFL Players Association have approached the negotiations on the 2020 season like negotiations on a broader labor deal: Start with the easy issues, and then move to the difficult ones.

As to football in a pandemic, the easy ones are done. The difficult ones remain.

Ian Rapoport of the NFL reports that “[a]lmost everything is done and agreed to except for number of preseason games and testing protocols.” Those are two very significant issues, however.

The NFL wants two preseason games, the NFLPA wants none, and the two sides are stuck at an impasse on the issue. The testing protocols remain a point of contention, given that the players want testing more frequently. Throw in the fact that it may not be easy to get results quickly (and that doing so could slow down the process of finalizing tests for the general public), it will not be a simple process to reach a consensus on how often testing will be conducted and how quickly teams and players reasonably will obtain results.

Rapoport’s final point is this: “The economics are not yet finalized, either.”

That’s perhaps the most significant remaining area of tension. It was Rapoport and his colleagues who first floated, under the umbrella of the league’s in-house media conglomerate, the notion of salary givebacks. Then, NFL Media reported on the fact that the league suggested placing 35 percent of 2020 player salaries into escrow, which will make it easier to claw back money later.

The NFLPA recognizes that lost revenues now will impact salary-cap calculations later, but the suggestion that any player should take less in a season during which players will be assuming a greater risk is nonsensical. Plenty of the men who play in 2020 won’t even be in the league in 2021, whether due to injury, retirement, or erosion of skills relative to younger, cheaper options. Why take less now (while absorbing all the risks of football in a pandemic) so that there will be more later, if the players who take less now won’t be around to get more later?

Taken together, these aren’t small issues. They are major points of contention that must be resolved before anything can happen. Meanwhile, rookies are due to report for COVID-19 testing in only nine days.

That leads us back to the point that J.J. Watt made earlier this week on #PFTPM: What’s the rush? It makes much more sense to get it right and delay things a bit than it does to rush into a headwind that could blow down what ultimately could be a house of cards.

9 responses to “NFL, NFLPA still have major issues to negotiate

  1. lets say you signed a big contract you got lots up front money and reduced salary this in th beginning..

    Contrast with a franchise or end of contact player with a bigger actual salary number who has to play to get the money?

    Example Zeke has a lower salary vs the Dak in the timing. What Zeke says Im sitting out… Is there any pullback of bonuses if you skip the year or games?

  2. The answer to all your questions is money.
    Let’s do ‘pay for play’. Once the shield cancels the season at 2 games, everybody gets paid for 2 games at their contract rate. Done!

  3. The CBA allowals the league to schedule up to four preseason games. The owners set workplace safety rules There is nothing to negotiate.

    The league can cancel the season or a part thereof.

    Players can opt to sit out at no pay.

  4. To backup JJ Watt. Why is there enough time to do it right but always enough time to do it over?

  5. Over/Under on the season going down the toilet after they blindly try to start like everything is normal: I have got it at 4 games (early October). And I think I am being generous. Once a team has a huge outbreak and cannot play (weeks 1, 2, or 3) the season is over.

  6. What to negotiate? The current CBA doesn’t run out until 2021. Those who don’t want to play/coach/train/whatever…don’t.

  7. “Let’s do ‘pay for play’. Once the shield cancels the season at 2 games, everybody gets paid for 2 games at their contract rate. Done!”

    Not so easy. The CBA was apparently written with no concession for the owners/teams if games are cancelled.

    Ie; the players are all entitled to full salary per contract if no games are played. Florio wrote about this several weeks ago.

    Why would the players ever agree to a prorated salary as you suggest?

    I have no sympathy for the owners who have been so greedy in so many ways, structured so many parts of the CBA to benefit them over the players, and could all afford to pay the players in full no matter how many games are played? And in doing so would not suffer one bit to their opulent quality of life for as long as they live.

    Players should tell the billionaires exactly what they would say if the situation were reversed. Pay up.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.