Brian Urlacher chimes in on Jacob Blake situation

Getty Images

At the risk of being accused of trying to “cancel” Hall of Fame Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher (the first question would be, “Cancel him from what?”), it’s important to highlight a comment he made Thursday that has triggered a Twitter trend trifecta of Urlacher, Brett Favre, and former teammate Lance Briggs.

Said Urlacher, on Instagram: “Brett Favre played the MNF game the day his dad died, threw 4 TDs in the first half, and was a legend for playing in the face of adversity. NBA players boycott the playoffs because a dude reaching for a knife, wanted on a felony sexual assault warrant, was shot by police.”

Apart from the nonsensical comparison of Favre, who chose to play through a personal tragedy that had no broader societal significance, to the repeated shooting in the back of Jacob Blake (a/k/a “a dude) by police, Urlacher takes refuge in the reckless whatabout? narrative that many have adopted in the aftermath of the latest video that shows, to anyone with a fair mind and a human heart, the use of lethal force when other non-lethal means for subduing a suspect were readily available.

Jacob Blake wasn’t reaching for a knife. He had a knife in the car. (News flash: Plenty of people have knives in their cars.) And as noted earlier today on our Twitter page, regardless of whether someone has previously committed crimes or currently is suspected of committing a crime, no one should be able to exercise the power of judge, jury, and executioner over any American citizen without due process.

The actions of the officers who shot Jacob Blake strike directly to the heart of the concerns first raised by Colin Kaepernick in August 2016. Persons who have the ability to use lethal force must know when and where to use it, and more importantly when and where to not use it. No effort to cast aspersions on Jacob Blake’s history justifies the unloading of a clip into his back without due process, not under the circumstances shown in that video. And anyone who thinks it does should never be a police officer.

I didn’t want to address Urlacher’s remarks. The problem, however, is that way too many people seem to agree with him. And if in a moment like this we aren’t willing to stand up and shout what’s right and what’s wrong, when will we ever do it?

19 responses to “Brian Urlacher chimes in on Jacob Blake situation

  1. Once again, if anyone has a diffence of opinion , they are wrong and canceled out. Brian is entitled to his.

  2. @jonathankrobinson424: Exactly. While I don’t agree with how he describes his point, he is entitled to have an opinion.

  3. He had too many concussions. Part of the Athlete 3 stooges with Kurt Schilling and Aubrey Huff.

  4. Throwing 4 TDs against the Raiders defense in one half is not a big accomplishment.

  5. “Because a dude reaching for a knife, wanted on a felony sexual assault warrant, was shot by police.”

    Brian does make a good point !

  6. It might be a case where he hasn’t actually seen the video and is just going by what he has heard or read. That happened to me during the Floyd murder. I hadn’t seen the incident and had really bad info but did a complete 180 when I saw what happened. Never the less, it still comes off as insensitive.

  7. As a police officer you don’t know who your dealing with 90% of the calls. You approach it with caution, which may come across as hard. But when the officer says your under arrest, you then need to go peacefully and explain your situation later. But on the other hand you should not have your weapon out unless the accused has a weapon. So shooting someone in that instance does not need to be done.But I ask this question, What would you do? someone starts to resist, your adrenaline is flowing and your scared. But that’s what the police are trained in….I Hope… Walk in both shoes before attacking!!!

  8. Shot 7 times the back. 7 times. No evidence he was reaching for a knife. Comparing Favre playing thru the death of his father with protesting the literal execution of a man in front of his children. Urlacher’s take is totally clueless and ignorant. Period.

  9. Doesn’t matter if the guy is a scumbag or has an outstanding warrant, shouldn’t have been shot unless he visibly posed a threat with a weapon – that’s basic training. That’s for a jury to decide, not Urlacher or PFT readers.

    What slays me is that a guy gets shot 8 times in the back and some other 17 yr old yahoo kills 2 people, and Urlacher and others on this site are whining about whether pro athletes boycott games. Either folks don’t care or are purposely ignoring the real issue. That’s the problem.

  10. “I didn’t want to address Urlacher’s remarks. The problem, however, is that way too many people seem to agree with him. And if in a moment like this we aren’t willing to stand up and shout what’s right and what’s wrong, when will we ever do it?”

    Well said!
    Thanks Mike

  11. Bravo Florio. Stand up to the detritus of America. To heck with the idiots posting here. Free speech isn’t free from consequence, and maybe meat heads like Urlacher will realize that someday.

  12. From what I’ve heard, Blake was trespassing, a 911 call was made because he took someone’s keys, he fought with the officers, tasing failed, he’s known to be violent, he told the officers he had a knife, was told repeatedly to stop, and how does ANYONE know he want reaching for the knife – and how can you assume he wasn’t? Now, 7 times seems a bit excessive, but I’ve never been in that situation, so . . .

  13. Luckily for LEOs, they know the majority have their backs. Unfortunately, the majority can’t voice their support because they’ll be attacked or “canceled.”

  14. That “he wasn’t reaching for a knife” is a straw man statement until it is proven to be fact.

  15. bearssuck says:
    August 27, 2020 at 7:50 pm
    “Because a dude reaching for a knife, wanted on a felony sexual assault warrant, was shot by police.”

    Brian does make a good point !
    ———————————————————–
    No he does not.
    We have no clue what Blake was reaching for, if anything, or why he had opened his door.
    Maybe he had water and was thirsty.
    Wanted to check in on and tell his kids he was busy.
    Left his keys in there and wanted to get them.
    There are a hundred reasons why and everyone who is on the cops side will do all they can to paint this guy as worse than Hitler, Stalin and Charles Manson combined and just go with the narrative of him doing something negative so they can keep on hating him instead of looking for the truth.

    And if you are a Packers fan based on your name then I am ashamed to be a Packers fan with you.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.