Jerry Jones sidesteps report that Dak Prescott would have done five-year deal with no tag on back end

Getty Images

The question of whether Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott would or wouldn’t have signed a long-term deal with specific terms included or omitted is irrelevant at this point. The July 15 deadline came and went without the two sides signing a new deal, which means they can’t do a long-term deal until after the 2020 regular season ends.

But that doesn’t mean it’s meaningless to wonder what Dak or Dallas would have done on a long-term deal, because history could indeed repeat itself in 2021, when the Cowboys have the power to tag Dak again. On Sunday, Jason La Canfora of CBS Sports reported that Prescott would have signed a five-year deal if the Cowboys had sacrificed the ability to apply the franchise tag after the contract expires. On Tuesday, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones was asked about that report during one of his twice-weekly appearances on 105.3 The Fan in Dallas.

“I’m not going to specifically get into Dak’s situation and wouldn’t,” Jones said. “The franchise tag itself is normally reserved for a very, very impactful one that gives you leverage, one that allows you to, if you will, bargain but still keep the player. It’s an integral part of the negotiation process in the NFL. That’s not just to Dak. That’s to any player there is. You would not want it to be a very valuable to retain in our case, and we did. But it gives you the ability to do what we’re doing this year, and that’s without agreement we’re on a long-term contract.”

Although Jones’ response arguably creates the impression that the report is accurate but that Jones simply doesn’t want to confirm it, a source with knowledge of the situation tells PFT that the possibility of a five-year deal with no tag on the back end wasn’t discussed.

Dak wanted a four-year deal, cognizant that the Cowboys would have the ability to tag him for a year or two after that. Throughout the talks, the reports centered on four years versus five years; it was never reported or suggested that the compromise would potentially reside in a five-year deal with no tag.

If the Cowboys still insist on a five-year deal after the season, maybe they should consider offering no franchise tag as part of the package. Whatever they offer, it will need to be enough to get Dak to give up his right to force another tag — at a value of $37.68 million for 2021.

6 responses to “Jerry Jones sidesteps report that Dak Prescott would have done five-year deal with no tag on back end

  1. ‘You would not want it to be a very valuable to retain in our case, and we did’.

    What does that mean, anyone? It’s positively incomprehensible and makes absolutely zero sense.

  2. Okay, this time I think it’s on Dak. It would be another 5 years, bringing his total to 9 with the Cowboys. I would think he would be settled in the Dallas area. He would already have earned over $200 million. Would a tag of probably $50 million be so bad for another year? The elder statesman of Brady, Brees, and Rivers never came close to sniffing the tag amounts for QB’s this year.

  3. Dak is gonna need to take the tag again if he wants to remain on the Cowboys AND get paid. With the cap shrinking next year, I doubt Jerry will be offering as much as he did this year.

  4. Lets say Dak is above average but not excellent.
    How many teams gave bad QB situations?

    Jets, Bears, Colts, Giants, Brooncos, Steelers in a couple of years, Tampa as well. Plenty of others.

    Take the Bills. Josh Allen is ok under his rookie deal, which runs through 2021. What about after? Would you want to pay Josh Allen $28-30 million, which is probably what mid level QBs will be making in 2 years?

    If you can get a known quantity, an above average QB, rather than paying a bad QB 25% less, wouldn’t you do it?

    The problem is there aren’t enough even so-so QBsa to go around.
    If there were more Josh Allens, you could draft one, then let him walk once his contract was up.

  5. Tony romo was able to do a deal that precludes the cowboys from franchising him and it gave him a ton of leverage

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.