Davante Adams sits out Thursday’s practice a day after being limited

Getty Images

Packers receiver Davante Adams played through an ankle injury Sunday. He had a limited practice Wednesday when he said “the idea” is to play Sunday.

But Adams did not practice Thursday.

Adams has 61 catches for 741 yards and nine touchdowns in seven games this season, leading the league in receiving yards per game at 105.9. He missed two games earlier this season with a hamstring injury.

Tight end Marcedes Lewis (knee) also went from a limited practice Wednesday to missing Thursday’s work.

Cornerback Jaire Alexander (concussion) and receiver Darrius Shepherd (shoulder) had full practices Thursday after being limited Wednesday. Receiver Equanimeous St. Brown (knee) returned to limited work after missing practice a day earlier.

Cornerback Kevin King (quad) remained a full participant.

13 responses to “Davante Adams sits out Thursday’s practice a day after being limited

  1. Their record of 7-2 is testament to the depth this Packer team has at the WR position. Either that, or Rodgers deserves serious consideration for MVP for getting the job done with an oft-injured No.1 and an absent No.2. Take your pick. All good.

  2. Better hope that next man up mentality holds true. If Adams doest play Sunday the Colts will have an edge. They have a solid running game which seems to be the Packers Achilles Heel.Alot depends if the Packers get good Old Man Rivers or bad Old Man Rivers. Should be a good match up, the past two weeks haven’t been very good for the Pack and confidence is shaken right now. The Colts after all are a 6-3 team. Pettine’s D will be tested again.

  3. danicafallsinlove says:
    November 19, 2020 at 11:04 pm
    Taking a WR in that first round isn’t such a bad idea now is it?
    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    It’s not doing the Vikings any good. To stay relevant they have to implement Peterson II from Childress’ playbook.

  4. Not real concerned about Davante. As he said this week about the ankle: “It’s not a 911. We are just keeping a eye on it.”

    Unless something happens in practice on Friday or at the walk-thru on Saturday, you can expect Tae to be out there Sunday.

    #GoPackGo!

  5. stellarperformance says:
    November 20, 2020 at 7:50 am
    danicafallsinlove says:
    November 19, 2020 at 11:04 pm
    Taking a WR in that first round isn’t such a bad idea now is it?
    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    It’s not doing the Vikings any good. To stay relevant they have to implement Peterson II from Childress’ playbook.

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    The Lamb > then the Lizard
    CeeDee was there and the Packers organization missed it! He would have made an immediate impact unlike waiting for 3 or fours years. Any word if your new “Love” will be activated for any games this year?

  6. rodgersgobucyourself says:
    November 20, 2020 at 1:13 pm
    Any word if your new “Love” will be activated for any games this year?
    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Probably not, he’s a three-year project just like Rodgers was. Pay attention.

  7. CeeDee Lamb was selected with the 17th pick. You might have well as suggested the Packers should have selected Joe Burrow instead.

  8. stellarperformance says:
    November 20, 2020 at 1:34 pm
    rodgersgobucyourself says:
    November 20, 2020 at 1:13 pm
    Any word if your new “Love” will be activated for any games this year?
    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Probably not, he’s a three-year project just like Rodgers was. Pay attention.

    ———————————

    I’m paying attention, three year project? The Packers moved up to get him! Sorry but when you draft a QB that high first rouond…freaking DUH! He should be moving up the roster by now with 10 games in. Project? NFL is win now there is no time for 3-4 projects. The landscape of the NFL has changed since Rodgers was drafted or you still stuck in 2005.

    packertruthvspurpleblather says:
    November 20, 2020 at 3:15 pm
    CeeDee Lamb was selected with the 17th pick. You might have well as suggested the Packers should have selected Joe Burrow instead.

    _______________

    You moved up to take Love who hasn’t even been activated for any game this year whose to say Lamb would have not been there, you don’t know. Burrow would have moved up the depth chart by now.

  9. rodgersgobucyourself says:
    November 20, 2020 at 7:52 pm

    You moved up to take Love who hasn’t even been activated for any game this year whose to say Lamb would have not been there, you don’t know.

    +++++

    I know Lamb went pick 17 and I know Green Bay wasn’t willing to move the draft capital to move up that high. I can’t tell whether you understand that or not.

    I’m also unsure whether you know you read the standings from top down and not bottom up. Skol.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.