Kliff Kingsbury: Cardinals’ penalties “unacceptable”

Getty Images

The Cardinals were penalized 10 times for 115 yards in Thursday night’s loss to the Seahawks, and afterward coach Kliff Kingsbury cited those penalties as a major reason his team fell short.

You’re not going to win in this league doing that, especially against a quality team against Seattle,” Kingsbury said, via ArizonaSports.com. “That’s unacceptable to have that many and we got to clean that up. Just got to refocused and be better moving forward. The guys, when that occurs, they’re always feeling bad about the situation and so you just try to make sure we get past it and not allow it to happen against and not allow it to affect us moving forward.”

Among the penalties for the Cardinals were a taunting penalty on Dre Kirkpatrick that gave the Seahawks first down on what would have been fourth down, a 46-yard pass interference penalty on Patrick Peterson, four false starts and three offensive holdings.

Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray agreed with his coach’s assessment.

“Probably just the little self-inflicted penalties,” Murray said. “Just really shooting ourselves in the foot. It wasn’t a clean game by any means — easier said than done to play those — but that’s just . . . we got to be better.”

The penalties were costly, and so was the loss. The Cardinals are now a game behind the Seahawks in the NFC West.

5 responses to “Kliff Kingsbury: Cardinals’ penalties “unacceptable”

  1. Agreed but the non call of pass interference on Diggs when he hit Larry early in the end zone ended the game for us… That was some straight bull crap!!!

  2. I think the word is discipline . . . just don’t do it, or at least, don’t expect to get away with it.

  3. a 46-yard pass interference penalty on Patrick Peterson

    ———–

    No penalty should be 46 yards. I really wish the NFL would adopt the 15 yard penalty on DPI like college. It’s gotten so ticky tack that I like it when the defense actually gets away with blatant PI.

  4. savethebs says:
    No penalty should be 46 yards. I really wish the NFL would adopt the 15 yard penalty on DPI like college. It’s gotten so ticky tack that I like it when the defense actually gets away with blatant PI.
    ==

    Respectfully, I couldn’t disagree more.
    The long pass is one of the most exciting plays in football, and going the college route would kill it in the NFL.
    We already see intentional pass interference in the college game from players that know they’re beaten and would rather give up 15 yards than a long score. I’ve seen and heard announcers point it out, and even praise it as a smart move under the circumstances.
    It would be even worse in the NFL, where large egos and millions more eyes on most games, combined with players who are playing for their livelihoods, would create a massive increase in intentional pass interference every time a receiver got a step on a defender.
    I get what you’re saying, and too often officials are either too ticky-tacky with their calls, or allow too much contact. But I guarantee you will notice and not like what you see if the NFL eventually adopts the college rule.
    Perhaps the solution is the compromise of a 25-yard penalty to address both sides of the issue. It’s not “46 yards,” but it’s not merely 15 either.

  5. I would add to my previous statement that a 15-yard pass interference penalty would effectively ruin many, if not most Hail Mary passes like the one Kyler Murray pulled off a week ago.
    Officials rarely call PI on that play. But if the penalty were only 15 yards, defenders that find themselves one-on-one, or even two-on one against a tall guy like DeAndre Hopkins will simply tackle them. The offense gets a second chance — from 15 yards closer — but it’s better than getting beaten for a game-winning score.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.