NFL believes Ravens ongoing positives reflect the tail end of the exposures

Getty Images

With the Ravens and Steelers scheduled to play on Tuesday night, the Ravens continue to generate positive COVID-19 results. That has not yet delayed the game for what would be a third time.

The NFL believes that the lingering positive results (tight end Mark Andrews and linebacker Matthew Judon tested positive on Saturday) represent the tail end of the transmissions. The recent positives were expected, based on the results of the league’s aggressive contact-tracing procedures.

With the Ravens facility shut down since in-person meetings and most of a walk-through practice on Tuesday, the incubation period for anyone who may have caught the virus in the building is closing. At some point, any additional positives are the result not of the outbreak but community spread.

The NFL remains willing to assume the risk of players shedding virus at practices and games before testing positive, for exposures happening in the community. The league is willing to assume that risk because it has no choice, given the delay between sample collection and the generation of test results.

A donut hole always will exist on game days. (For the first several weeks of the season, the league wasn’t testing players on game day.) That donut hole keeps getting larger and larger as the infection rate in the various communities where NFL teams do business keeps going higher and higher.

The Baltimore outbreak reportedly started with a strength and conditioning coach who didn’t report symptoms and didn’t consistently wear a mask. Still, the strength and conditioning coach whom the Ravens refuse to name got it somewhere.

Everyone who gets it gets it somewhere. All players and coaches need to do a better job of complying with the league’s protocols in order to keep it from spreading when they have it, and some inevitably will. As we’ve seen all season long, they don’t consistently comply. If that doesn’t change soon, games will be lost, players won’t be paid, and a 16-team playoff tree eventually will be populated with teams that played different numbers of games.

The easiest solution, of course, would be to put all teams in a home-market bubble immediately. For reasons that reasonably trace to collective bargaining, the league hasn’t asked — and the union hasn’t offered.

Hopefully, both sides will have a simultaneous epiphany before games are lost and the integrity of the season has been undermined. Then again, the integrity season already has been undermined by procedures that preemptively knock out players based on potential exposure while compelling teams to go forward, with the latest and most prominent example being the Broncos using a practice-squad receiver as their starting quarterback against one of the best defenses in the league.

12 responses to “NFL believes Ravens ongoing positives reflect the tail end of the exposures

  1. The Monday morning positive test results announcements for players that just played less than 24 hours prior are troubling. When JK Dobbins was announced after huddling with the offense for most of the game, it felt like trouble was brewing.

  2. However they get their game postponed and favorable treatment while the league gives the Broncos the middle finger!

  3. If the Ravens facility has been closed since Tuesday and they have 30+ players either on IR or Covid-19 reserve, does that mean that they will play with street free-agents and practice squad players without a single practice together?

    If that is the case or if they have just one practice together when does the consideration to forfeit make more sense the the additional rick?

  4. MortimerInMiami says:
    November 29, 2020 at 10:36 am
    However they get their game postponed and favorable treatment while the league gives the Broncos the middle finger!
    No the Broncos did the exact opposite of what the league told them to do and failed to keep a QB isolated just in case something like this happened. This is completely the fault of the Broncos and no one else. Quit whining that the league is playing favorites when teams completely ignore the protocols.

  5. This is a lot of wishful thinking by the NFL. They have no substantive data pointing to the ongoing positives may be showing the tail end of exposures across the NFL.

  6. And an ongoing panic about young, healthy players being at risk (its the coaches who are in the dangerous age-group that should be worried)…..

  7. I get that teams may have a guy here or there test positive, then maybe a few to several be placed on the covid watch list. However, with all the tools at their disposal, and they have far more tools than the majority of the general public, it seems that this a total breakdown in protocol to have this many from one team test positive. It remains to be seen if the Steelers have more positives, but it appears that it is only Conner and a staff member who are positive, the rest are close contacts. That said, I hope all involved recover with no lasting effects.

  8. From the league perspective it’s all about getting as many games in before you are forced to shutdown the league for good. At that point the NFL will be forced to put together a hurried bubble to host playoffs if and only if here are any teams even healthy enough to participate.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.