Chargers scored rare overtime touchdown after giving up field goal

Los Angeles Chargers v Las Vegas Raiders
Getty Images

In 2010, the NFL modified its sudden-death overtime rules so that a team couldn’t win the game by merely receiving the kickoff and kicking a field goal on the first possession. Thursday night’s Chargers-Raiders game was only the fourth time in 11 seasons that rule came into play.

The Raiders received the overtime kickoff and kicked a field goal to take a three-point lead, but then the Chargers marched down the field and scored a touchdown to win the game. That had only happened three times previously: The Steelers beating the Browns in the final game of the 2016 season, the Cardinals beating the 49ers in 2017 and the Titans beating the Eagles in 2018.

It turned out that the much-discussed overtime rule change didn’t change much, as a touchdown after a field goal is still a rare ending in overtime. But it did change perceptions of overtime, as it just feels more fair to give the other team an opportunity to score if the first team with the ball kicks a field goal.

The rule hasn’t made a major impact on the NFL. For the Chargers and Raiders on Thursday night, the rule mattered a lot.

7 responses to “Chargers scored rare overtime touchdown after giving up field goal

  1. It’s interesting that since the new overtime rules went into effect (11 seasons ago) that only 4 games have had a touchdown after an initial field goal.

    I’d also be interested to know how many times there was a tying field goal after an opening field goal. And, further in that situation, who ultimately won the game – the initial field goal scoring team or opponent – or if it ended in a tie.

    That scenario wouldn’t have happened under the old rule either.

  2. Giving teams opportunities was the main point. Every week, half the teams playing don’t make the most of their opportunities.

    How many first-field-goal games included second and third field goals, and how many ended in two-field-goal ties, should also be factored in to the impact of the rule.

    The state of the rule seems fair to me. It gives both teams a chance while narrowing the margin of error, which seems appropriate for a tiebreaker.

  3. The rule has made a major impact. Teams are opting to go for the TD much more in OT to secure their win rather than moving the ball 30 yards and hoping on a prayer for a long FG.

  4. HagemeisterPark says:
    December 18, 2020 at 11:42 am

    The rule has made a major impact. Teams are opting to go for the TD much more in OT to secure their win rather than moving the ball 30 yards and hoping on a prayer for a long FG.

    ===================================================================================
    Absolutely right.
    Let’s not forget about all the times that the team with the ball 1st, go for it on 4th down rather than kicking a 50 yard FG or just punt to pin the other team deep. It has been a major change in the way coaches attack OT.

  5. Gruden should have gone for the win instead of the field gaol. Cost them the game, terrible coaching

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.