NFLPA president JC Tretter wants permanent changes to offseason schedule

Getty Images

The pandemic has forced the business world to make plenty of changes. And those changes have, in many cases, become improvements. The president of the NFL Players Association believes that changes made by pro football should be regarded as improvements, and should be made permanent.

“The COVID CBA forced significant changes, and it has shown us another way players and teams can successfully prepare for and play in the NFL,” Browns president JC Tretter writes in a column at the union’s official website. “This year has brought less time at practice than ever before. We had no offseason practices, fewer training camp practices and no preseason games. While some feared that those changes would lead to a sloppy 2020 NFL season, our collective level of play across the league has actually never been higher.

“I believe the changes implemented this season have demonstrated that we can put an entertaining product out on the field while further reducing wear and tear on our players’ bodies. Sloppy play would usually be evident with low-scoring games, a high number of penalties and more missed tackles — all things that have historically been attributed to insufficient practice time to hone our fundamentals. But we have seen the exact opposite this year, with points per game at an all-time high, a decreased number of penalties and even fewer missed tackles compared to last year.”

Tackling is the one thing that has suffered significantly since the practice changes made as a result of the 2011 CBA; thus, comparing 2020 to 2019 may not be an ideal barometer. Likewise, there could be fewer penalties this year because officials are throwing fewer flags.

Regardless, the games are exciting and points are being scored and that’s really all that matters. As a result, Tretter wants the changes made in 2020 to be permanent.

“[T]here is no reason for us to ever return to the previous offseason program,” Tretter writes. “We are the only major sports league with an offseason program. The most physically demanding sport is the only league that brings their players back for extra practices outside of the season. The argument in favor of these offseason practices is based on the assumption that players need reps during OTAs to develop and learn while teams need the practices to gel. Yet, the lack of OTAs this year demonstrated that those theories aren’t substantiated. New and first-year head coaches had success. Newly assembled teams had success. Rookies stepped in and played at a high level all across the league.”

The irony of Tretter’s position is that the vast majority of the offseason program is voluntary. Players don’t have to show up. But they do, either because they have money tied to showing up or they fear that other players vying for roster spots and playing time will be there or they simply want to do it, in order to get better. On that point, consider the extent to which Buccaneers quarterback Tom Brady and his teammates engaged in offseason practices, even after the union advises all players to stop practicing on their own.

“When we hopefully complete the current season, we will have to take a hard look at what forced and temporary changes should be made permanent,” Tretter writes.

That’s fine, but any changes will be the product of collective bargaining. If the union wants to get rid of offseason practices, the union has to be ready to give up something else. Tretter is smart enough to know this, and he’s smart enough to already have some ideas about what the union would be willing to do to get the changes he wants. Maybe, just maybe, Tretter and the union are dangling this request as part of a potential tradeoff for an 18-game regular season.

The NFL already will go to 17 games in 2021, in order to make back some of the money lost during the pandemic. An eighteenth game would make back even more of it. Dumping the offseason program and dramatically reducing the preseason could be the key to get the union to agree to a change that will generate plenty of revenue for the league and the union to share.

8 responses to “NFLPA president JC Tretter wants permanent changes to offseason schedule

  1. I’d hate to see how many players get into more trouble with all that extra free time – especially rookies, like Isaiah Wilson.

  2. I am amazed at how little the NFLPA wants to work compared to 20 years ago. How does a player work on fundamentals through zoom meetings? This is another ib a long list of bad ideas coming from union leadership.

  3. …”While some feared that those changes would lead to a sloppy 2020 NFL season, our collective level of play across the league has actually never been higher.”…


    Never been higher? I know he’s a smart guy but that is a stupid thing to say. Maybe it hasn’t been horrible but there’s no way it’s HIGHER than ever.

  4. Tretter is a bald-faced liar, a snake oil salesman pushing for a preference instead of what is best for the game as a whole. It was widely reported that league officials were tasked to throw fewer flags this season, which explains the lower penalty rates. In addition, he claims that play has been better, and that is ridiculous: the product on the field looked terrible at the start of the year, and it was evident that the surge in offense was due to defenses being behind the eight ball (it is generally understood that defenses need more practice polish than offenses, due to the nature of defenses needing to respond to what offenses are doing). It is also clear that teams that transitioned with their schemes suffered for the weakened offseason work too. For example, the Dallas Cowboys executed a fairly complete defensive scheme overhaul, and its defenders looked absolutely lost early in the year – while that defense has still be pretty mediocre as the year went along, the players have undeniably been more comfortable and effective. Why are there fewer missed tackles this year? Easy: you can’t miss the tackle if you aren’t even in position for a tackle attempt. And that’s what being unprepared will do for defenders.

  5. Next Up: NFL players will receive full pay to not play, while owners are forced to pay surrogates to perform in their place.

  6. A lack of a preseason is a competitive disadvantage to teams changing coaches, schemes, and or undergoing major youth movements. It’ll just widen the gap between teams firmly in their competitive window and those outside of it. Football needs the preseason, but I have no problem with further adjustments to ensure player safety.

  7. The Union has ruined as many careers as it has extended. Those two a days and extreme practice schedules were not in the best interest of the players and many got injured – but not practicing and having a limits on the number of practices per active season and the number of offseason practices and conditioning rules has caused some injuries when the players are not in game shape. The game has also suffered a bit with the lack of competitive practice time both preseason and during the season. Time to give on the practices in favor of more money.

  8. So will the referees countinue to not call offensive holding. Every team is doing it and getting away with it on every play.

    So NFL players don’t practice and they put in more rules to make it like arena football. NFLPA may be the useless union in sports

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.