Can the Hall of Fame keep the names of the new members quiet?

Hall of Fame Game - Dallas Cowboys v Arizona Cardinals
Getty Images

The Hall of Fame, for the next couple of weeks, will need to be a cone of silence.

On Tuesday, the 48 Hall of Fame selectors met virtually to debate and to vote on the new class. Fifteen modern-era finalists will become five finalists — all (or in theory none of whom will get in with enough up-or-down votes. Three other candidates (coach (Tom Flores), contributor (Bill Nunn), and senior (Drew Pearson)) had only the “yes” or “no” selection from the selectors.

The challenge now becomes keeping it all quiet until the new class is announced the night before Super Bowl LV.

Clark Judge of SI.com takes a closer look at what transpired during the meeting that lasted eight hours and 47 minutes.

Usually, the modern-era finalists are reduced by the voters from 15 to 10 and then from 10 to five. In order to promote secrecy, the voters know the 10 names but not the final five. They voted both on the reduction from 10 to five and on the up-or-down proposition for all 10.

So only those from the Hall of Fame who gathered and collected the votes know the outcome. The question becomes whether anyone will blab before Super Bowl eve.

One inductee is obvious: Peyton Manning. The presentation lasted seconds, with no debate. Some would say that should be the standard for all enshrinees.

But that wouldn’t be good for the business of the Hall of Fame, a museum that needs to have a full slate of new Hall of Famers every year, in order to ensure that there’s a reason for the Hall of Fame and Canton to become, for one weekend in August, the center of the football world.

8 responses to “Can the Hall of Fame keep the names of the new members quiet?

  1. The presentation lasted seconds, with no debate. Some would say that should be the standard for all enshrinees.

  2. kwjsb says:
    January 20, 2021 at 12:23 pm
    Clay Mathews Jr. needs to be on the final list

    ————–

    I am a Packer fan and no. Probably not ever. He was a great Packer and they will put him in the their hall but he was a good player. Not an all time great.

  3. Why would a voter blab? And why would an “insider” press for this information? No one at all would praise the insider for breaking the news, and the voter would risk losing their credentials. Seems like a lose-lose.

  4. BuckyBadger says:
    January 20, 2021 at 12:43 pm

    kwjsb says:
    January 20, 2021 at 12:23 pm
    Clay Mathews Jr. needs to be on the final list

    ————–

    I am a Packer fan and no. Probably not ever. He was a great Packer and they will put him in the their hall but he was a good player. Not an all time great.

    _____________________

    He was referencing Clay Matthews Jr, who played for the Browns, not CM3, who played for the Packers

  5. as much as I loved his contributions to the Lions Calvin deserves the hall…just not on the first ballot … gotta play a bit longer for that (exception Barry..only one Barry)

  6. Clay Mathews Jr. All Time sack leader for the Browns
    Not Clay Mathews III of the Packers !!!

    You guys are too young.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.