Cowboys receive league-high four compensatory draft picks in 2021

Dallas Cowboys Introduce Head Coach Mike McCarthy
Getty Images

The NFL announced its 2021 compensatory draft picks, which now include special compensatory picks rewarding teams for developing minority coaches and executives.

The selections this year are from the third to sixth rounds. With the CBA limiting the number of compensatory selections to the number of clubs in the league at 32, there were seven teams that qualified for a pick but did not receive it in the Falcons, Bears, Colts, Vikings, Eagles, Steelers, and Buccaneers. But only Indianapolis did not receive a selection at all because its free agent lost was ranked 33rd or lower in the formula used to generate picks.

The Cowboys have a league-high four compensatory draft picks in 2021, with one each in the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth round. Dallas lost Byron Jones, Robert Quinn, Randall Cobb, Xavier Su’a-Filo, and Jeff Heath, and Jason Witten last year in free agency.

There were five special compensatory selections awarded at the end of the third round — one for the 49ers, one for the Rams, one for the Ravens, and one for the Saints. Those each stem from another team hiring a minority from their organization to be either a head coach or General Manager. The NFL initially announced an incorrect number for San Francisco’s special selections with two this year instead of one. With Robert Saleh becoming the Jets head coach and Martin Mayhew becoming Washington’s G.M., San Francisco will receive a special compensatory selection for each of the next three years.

The Falcons and Packers each have three regular compensatory picks. The Panthers, Bears, Chiefs, Rams, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Eagles have two. The Ravens, Chargers, Steelers, 49ers, Buccaneers, and Titans have one.

The regular third-round picks went to the Patriots (No. 96), Chargers (No. 96), Saints (No. 98), Cowboys (No. 99), Titans (No. 100), and Rams (No. 101).

The special compensatory selections went to the 49ers (No. 102), Rams (No. 103), Ravens (No. 104), and Saints (No. 105).

The fourth-round selections went to the Cowboys (No. 138), Patriots (No. 139), Steelers (No. 140), Rams (No. 141), Packers (No. 142), Vikings (No. 143), and Chiefs (No. 144).

The fifth-round selections went to the Packers (No. 177), Cowboys (No. 178), Falcons (No. 179), 49ers (No. 180), Chiefs (No. 181), Falcons (No. 182), and Ravens (No. 183).

And the sixth-round selections went to the Buccaneers (No. 216), Saints (No. 217), Falcons (No. 218), Packers (No. 219), Bears (No. 220), Panthers (No. 221), Vikings (No. 222), Eagles (No. 223 and No. 224), Panthers (No. 225), Cowboys (No. 226), and Bears (No. 227).

Since 1994, the Ravens lead the league with 53 compensatory selections of the 876 awarded.

24 responses to “Cowboys receive league-high four compensatory draft picks in 2021

  1. With the overpaid and team killing contract for Dak, Jerrah has guaranteed that the Cowboys will never see a Super Bowl during his ownership. It’s a team support and Jerrah blew it all (over 12% of the cap) for a player with no room for a supporting Team.

  2. echansen50 says:
    March 10, 2021 at 6:15 pm
    Package them all for a higher pick.

    You can’t trade Comp picks

  3. Jerry has never failed to have enough money to sign picks and free agents..Some players will not be back. That money will be spread out to sign future players. He cam also restructure contracts to to free up more money..

  4. steeelfann0155 says:
    March 10, 2021 at 7:05 pm
    echansen50 says:
    March 10, 2021 at 6:15 pm
    Package them all for a higher pick.

    You can’t trade Comp picks

    —————————————————————–

    I thought they changed that rule recently.

  5. steeelfann0155 says:
    March 10, 2021 at 7:05 pm
    echansen50 says:
    March 10, 2021 at 6:15 pm
    Package them all for a higher pick.

    You can’t trade Comp picks
    ————————————————
    Actually, you can trade comp picks….. believe that rule has been changed for a couple years now…..

  6. steeelfann0155 says:
    March 10, 2021 at 7:05 pm
    echansen50 says:
    March 10, 2021 at 6:15 pm
    Package them all for a higher pick.

    You can’t trade Comp picks.

    Pretty sure the NFL changed that rule a couple of years ago.

  7. Funny how quickly the Cowboys were rewarded by the NFL for keeping a young, popular “ratings booster” player within the Cowboy organization

  8. Leading the league in compensatory picks is not a compliment — suggests institutional issues at the franchise to be losing so much high-tier talent in free agency.

  9. This compensatory pick BS needs to stop.
    —————————————————————————————
    Why is it BS? I don’t understand what would be perceived as unfair about it.

  10. jimmygeewhiz says:
    March 11, 2021 at 7:43 am
    Leading the league in compensatory picks is not a compliment — suggests institutional issues at the franchise to be losing so much high-tier talent in free agency.

    8 3 Rate This
    ******************************************************************************************
    Would you care to elaborate? Leading the league in comp picks is a badge of honor. If you draft well and your coaches develop players, there is no way you can keep all of them. Some are not core players and the team opts to let them walk because they have someone else in the wings ready to take their spot. Or, other teams overpay for some other players. Of course, it doesn’t not make a lot of sense to play that bidding war. You wish the players well, shake their hands and let them walk and make as much money as possible to secure their future and their families future.
    You certainly cannot keep all your players. That’s why you go back to the drawing board, rinse and repeat. Good, stable teams that draft well and develop players and do not go crazy in free agency get comp picks.

  11. jimmygeewhiz says:
    March 11, 2021 at 7:43 am
    Leading the league in compensatory picks is not a compliment — suggests institutional issues at the franchise to be losing so much high-tier talent in free agency.

    No, it means in most cases you are maximizing the value of your draft class and the rookie contract. When you draft well, the second deal is often something the drafting team can’t afford. So they pay a minimum for the first few years, let them walk, and come away with a draft pick to potentially replace them. PS- this article does not mention that the Ravens got TWO 3rd round picks, just because the Texans hired David Culley away to be their coach. It’s absolutely a smart way to run your team, assuming you know how to draft well.

  12. They would give all of that back to have an opportunity to re-sign Byron Jones.

  13. Jerry Jones is busy trying to convince other teams that Ziggy Elliott is the second coming of Hershel Walker

  14. >Leading the league in compensatory picks is not a compliment — suggests institutional issues at the franchise to be losing so much high-tier talent in free agency.

    Incorrect.

    Robert Quinn, Randall Cobb and Xavier Su’a-Filo were all short term free agent signings. They contributed to the Cowboys for a season on cap friendly deals and then signed elsewhere at overpriced contracts which allowed the Cowboys to gain draft picks. That is not an “institutional issue,” it is a positive. It is evidence of sharp free agent signings.

    Jeff Heath and Jason Witten were both examples of addition by subtraction. They were both way below average starters. The Cowboys were better for them being gone. Letting them walk was a long overdue decision.

    Byron Jones is a top tier Corner. Unfortunately, his value was beyond what the Cowboys were able to afford. Considering where he was drafted, and what his present salary is, it is difficult to claim that the Cowboys made a poor decision in drafting him in the first place or in making the decision to let him walk.

    Next year or the year after that, who will be the better corner, Travon Diggs or Byron Jones? My money is on Diggs.

  15. Robert Quinn, Randall Cobb and Xavier Su’a-Filo were all short term free agent signings. They contributed to the Cowboys for a season on cap friendly deals and then signed elsewhere at overpriced contracts which allowed the Cowboys to gain draft picks. That is not an “institutional issue,” it is a positive. It is evidence of sharp free agent signings.
    ___________

    It is evidence of a broken system. No team should be rewarded for signing players to one year deals and then letting them sign elsewhere the following season.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.