Report: Packers working on restructuring Aaron Rodgers’ contract

Green Bay Packers v Carolina Panthers
Getty Images

Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers wants clarity on his future in Green Bay. The Packers could give him that clarity with a contract extension that guarantees him more money for more future seasons. It’s unclear whether they’re willing to give him that.

Mike Silver reported on NFL Network that the Packers are working on restructuring Rodgers’ contract to free up cap space, but that it was unclear whether they would do so in such a way that can make Rodgers confident the Packers are committed to him beyond the 2021 season. Silver suggested that the Packers might want to keep open the possibility that they’d move on to Jordan Love in 2022 and not commit anything more to Rodgers beyond 2021 than they already have.

Silver’s report was short on details about what kind of restructuring the Packers are seeking, but as noted by Jason Fitzgerald of OverTheCap.com, if the Packers just wanted a simple restructuring of Rodgers’ contract that converted some of this year’s base salary to a signing bonus, they could just do that now because they have the right to convert base salary into signing bonus in his contract. There’s nothing they need to “work on.” If the Packers are negotiating with Rodgers, they must be negotiating an extension or adding void years to his deal.

So it remains to be seen whether the Packers are going to make Rodgers happy by giving him clarity about his future, or if the team wants to leave itself an out to move on to Love in a year.

27 responses to “Report: Packers working on restructuring Aaron Rodgers’ contract

  1. If Rodgers gets an extension, the Love pick was a huge mistake that very well could’ve cost Green Bay the Super Bowl.

    Tampa used its first round pick on a great offensive lineman who helped them win the Super Bowl. Brady is 6 years older than Rodgers.

  2. I gotta have more SB rings than Foles, or in other words, at least as many as (Eli) Manning.

  3. The Packers don’t seem to have a plan at all. They draft a QB and RB in rounds #1 and #2 then after shelling out for a QB and then paying a 27 year old back. Want to save cap dollars let Dillon take the lead back role and draft your #2 back. Then you could beef up the run D that has been killing the team for 2 decades.

  4. Love it – this will open up the salary cap. And if Rogders sticks around, Green Bay will have a great trade unit in a quailty trained your QB. win win for GB.

  5. Great investment plan by green bay. If they stick with Rodgers they can get more than the single 1st round pick they used in a trade for Love. If they part ways with Rodgers, they have a talented young stud qb for the next 15 years.

  6. Trading a “quality trained” or handing off to a “talented young stud qb” is ambitious wishing, hoping and praying for someone that has not played, or even dressed for one down in NFL regular season.

    We all heard that song and dance with Hundley and trading him for a 1st round pick.

    Glad you are all comfortable with that

  7. Good for Aaron! He always gets what’s best for him.

  8. Rodgers hasn’t said one word. He never does. He doesn’t need to. He’s not Danielle Hunter.

  9. Tough call, really. What are the pros and cons? He’s one of the greatest regular season QB’s of all time. He had a great season last year, only second to Patrick Mahomes. But he’s also getting older, he is 1-4 in the NFCCG (and kind of choked last year), and hasn’t been to the SB in 11 years. Getting to the SB is the plan, I would assume. And, there’s that little thing about them trading up to draft his replacement last year. You extend him, and you might as well admit out loud what a mistake that was.

  10. stellarperformance says:
    March 22, 2021 at 11:03 pm
    Rodgers hasn’t said one word. He never does. He doesn’t need to. He’s not Danielle Hunter.////// I’m not sure I’ve ever heard Hunter talk. Rodgers? Oh, he talks. A lot. Also, this article isn’t about the Vikings. Not sure you knew that.

  11. HagemeisterPark says:
    March 22, 2021 at 6:47 pm
    Great investment plan by green bay. If they stick with Rodgers they can get more than the single 1st round pick they used in a trade for Love. If they part ways with Rodgers, they have a talented young stud qb for the next 15 years.
    /////////
    Lol. What in the world are you talking about? Closer to reality would be…..at best a low level 1st for Love, after he has never played in the NFL and has sat on the bench for 4 years. In reality, what will probably happen is; AR will sign an extension, Love will ride the pine for his entire rookie contract, and the Packers will have a tough call on picking up Love’s 5th year, because nobody will have a clue if he can play at this level or not. It was absolutely a horrible decision to trade up and draft him last year.

  12. chickensalad43 says:
    March 22, 2021 at 4:31 pm
    If Rodgers gets an extension, the Love pick was a huge mistake that very well could’ve cost Green Bay the Super Bowl.

    Tampa used its first round pick on a great offensive lineman who helped them win the Super Bowl. Brady is 6 years older than Rodgers.
    /////////
    I don’t understand why packer fans cannot admit this. Literally everybody in the universe knows trading up and drafting Love was a mistake. Everybody. The only thing that wouldn’t make it a mistake is if Rodgers either had a career ending injury last year, or the team went 6-10. Neither of those things happened.

  13. Rodgers hasn’t said one word. He never does. He doesn’t need to. He’s not Danielle Hunter.
    Phtttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

    Please show us where Hunter has said anything, anything regarding a new contract.

    Deflecting BS as usual

  14. I don’t understand why packer fans cannot admit this. Literally everybody in the universe knows trading up and drafting Love was a mistake. Everybody.
    ==========

    I said the exact same thing when the Packers chose Rodgers in 2005. In almost every respect, Rodgers is better than Favre.

    I’m willing to let it play out. Look at the state of QBs across the League. I’m glad the Packers have their successor in place, rather than having to sign Mitch Trubisky, or Fitzmagic once Rodgers decides its over.

  15. Getting to the SB is the plan, I would assume.
    ==========

    Its the hope. I think thats all it is after last year.

    This is too much like the Sherman teams. Too many holes. And unless they really crush a draft, they won’t be able to fill all of them.

  16. Shaliene Rodgers says:
    March 23, 2021 at 12:15 pm
    I don’t understand why packer fans cannot admit this. Literally everybody in the universe knows trading up and drafting Love was a mistake. Everybody.
    ==========

    I said the exact same thing when the Packers chose Rodgers in 2005.
    ////////
    Except, of course, the main difference is that Favre was humming and hawing every off season on returning. The Packers simply didn’t know if Favre was reliable. So when Rodgers dropped in the draft, they grabbed him. And they certainly were not coming off a 13-3 season.

  17. There are so many layers of the Favre situation.

    There was never any question the man was going to play, IMO. You don’t play however many games in a row, through all the hits he took, if you don’t want to die on the field. No one, ever, should have questioned his desire to play.

    Personally, I think he dangled that carrot out there to try to get Ted to go all in. Had he got to the Super Bowl in 2007, I really think that would have been it for him.

    Rodgers doesn’t strike me as the same type of guy. I don’t see him playing into his mid-40s. And 2017-2019 weren’t exactly looking like his former glory. No one anticipated 2020 being a career-type year.

  18. Rodgers doesn’t strike you as the same type of guy…and you don’t see him playing into his mid-40’s?

    He’s explicitly stated that was and is his goal. I don’t understand why people say this.

    Also, the NFL is so much different than even just Favre’s era. Rules changed when Brady got hurt(couldn’t go low). Then when Rodgers got hurt(couldn’t drive though the player on the tackle). You brush a QB’s helmet in the pocket, it’s a 15 yard penalty.

    So given Rodgers arm talent, there’s absolutely no reason he can’t play at a very high level for the next 4-5 years…provided they are able to protect him. OT should be their top priority. Bahktiari’s injury killed them in the Tampa game, but Billy Turner is also an overrated RT. The Packers offense helped their OL last year more than the other way around. The pre-snap motion, the quick timing routes, their running game and play action game. Edge rushers weren’t able to just get after Rodgers, they had to set the edge and worry about a lot of different things. That accounted for Turners high pass blocking grade IMO. They should be doing whatever they can to add a franchise tackle who can hopefully team with Bahk to give Rodger two bookend OT’s for the next 4-5 years. Darrisaw is someone they could trade up for, Jenkins is someone who may be there when they draft.

    CB is a need, but if they had a better tackle than Turner last year, another stud across from Bak before he got hurt, his loss wouldn’t have cost us a SB.

  19. “Rodgers should refuse after the Kevin King signing.”

    Yeah, it’s kinda funny how upset people are about this. I think it’s very likely he signed a contract where his base would be the vet minimum(2.5 but count just 950K against the cap) with incentives. Probably the unlikely to be earned types, or based on how many games he’s played.

    I’ve also see people say he’s got no upside. There’s no question he hasn’t been the player we hoped. But he is exceptionally athletic, long and best in man coverage. He really does have the upside to be a very good #2. Not that I’d count on that, I’m guessing they’re counting on him providing insurance and depth while trying to find another starter, but even if he’s just the player he was in 2019, that’s a massive win for the Packers. Savage, Gary, Keke are all improving. More pressure, better play in the secondary, arguably the best CB in the NFL. We don’t need him to be an All Pro. Just better than he was last year.

    And hopefully Barry doesn’t play single high quite so often this year. And if he does, he shades towards King(IF he’s even the starter).

    With 10 picks and Gutekunst having traded up for every 1st round pick he’s drafted thus far, plus several other picks, I would anticipate the Packers moving up once, maybe twice in the first 3-4 rounds. Top ~20 gets you a stud OT, middle of the 2nd gets you a CB that might be contributor like Diggs was last year for Dallas. That’s two huge holes.

  20. “Except, of course, the main difference is that Favre was humming and hawing every off season on returning. The Packers simply didn’t know if Favre was reliable. So when Rodgers dropped in the draft, they grabbed him. And they certainly were not coming off a 13-3 season.”

    No, but they were coming off a similar season. The Packers 13-3 season in 2019 was not an accurate representation of their team and EVERYONE knows and knew that. They were in year one of their offense and struggled there and the defense was just awful at times.

    The year they drafted Rodgers, they were coming off a loss to the Vikings in the playoffs(a team they’d beaten twice that year) and were very much viewed as a contender that needed immediate help.

    The Love pick is obviously not a perfect comparison to the Rodgers pick. QB’s have much more longevity now…but it’s also not as dissimilar as people would seem to suggest.

    I was confident that the offense would be much better in year two with MLF…just as it historically has in that scheme with McVay, Kyle Shannahan’s teams in ATL and SF. BUT, Rodgers also missed more open throws in 2019 than I’d ever remembered.

    And people forget how high some people were on Love’s upside. Even now people compare Zach Wilson’s talent to that of Love…Wilson’s just obviously less of a project. And Love may have been viewed that way had he not lost his top 6 receivers, his entire OL and gotten his 3rd coach in 3 years heading into his RDS Soph year at Utah State.

    So I understand why they picked Love. You can see how talented he is. But there’s no reason that has to influence your decision going forward. Extend Rodgers. If Love really does look that good, you can move on from Rodgers still…3 years from now, eat the cap hit, take a single off-season to clear the dead cap space and you’re good to go. People actl like this is the NBA and you can’t get out of these contracts and fix your Cap situation in one off-season.

    The Saints just cleared ~120 million in cap space since the season ended and they’ve signed players. This doesn’t have to be an either or proposition. They can be more aggressive, kick the salary cap issues down the road and then get out from under those in one season. Love’s 1st year starting for instance. Even Rodgers 1st year, the team was only 6-10 and they were pretty talented(incidentally, they’d also just gotten done clearing some dead cap from their roster).

    So you can BOTH go for it in the short term, THEN if you decide to go with Love, move on from Rodgers, eat the cap hit from him and whomever else you think isn’t core piece, get Love some playing time, get a good pick and re-set your cap situation.

    But how does winning a SB NOW not take priority over what Rodgers cap hit MIGHT be in a few years IF he retires or is traded? You’ll regret one forever. The other you’ll fix and deal with for one season.

    Also, extending Rodgers doesn’t mean they have to admit that Love was a mistake. Rodgers has since had his greatest season and Love went through his rookie year without OTA’s or taking any meaningful snaps in any game(or just ANY snaps). Love was a project with Mahomes-esque type arm talent. That hasn’t changed. Just the perception of Rodgers perceived “decline.”

    I don’t understand why people feel the need to dig in so far on ONE side of an argument or the other. It’s almost never as black and white as people would have you believe.

  21. Yeah, it’s kinda funny how upset people are about this. I think it’s very likely he signed a contract where his base would be the vet minimum(2.5 but count just 950K against the cap) with incentives. Probably the unlikely to be earned types, or based on how many games he’s played.
    ==========

    If they managed to bring him back and he counted nothing against the cap, I STILL wouldn’t want him.

  22. Rodgers doesn’t strike you as the same type of guy…and you don’t see him playing into his mid-40’s?

    He’s explicitly stated that was and is his goal. I don’t understand why people say this.
    ==========

    For me, probably just a byproduct of what I saw in Favre.

    It couldn’t be more obvious he was going to have to dragged off the field to get him to quit playing.

    Its not fair to compare the two, but I just don’t see that in Rodgers.

    I’d love to be wrong.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.