Given the cost of buying unsold jerseys, Dalvin Cook will stick with No. 33

Chicago Bears v Minnesota Vikings
Getty Images

The floodgates are open for players to embrace a new universe of numbers. For some, the water will be very expensive.

Now that the door is open for players to wear numbers that previously weren’t available, players who want to immediately change numbers must deal with one important caveat. They must buy all remaining inventory of unsold jerseys with the player’s current number.

More specifically, and per multiple sources, the players must purchase — at retail prices — the remaining Fanatics supply.

Per a source with knowledge of the situation, Vikings running back Dalvin Cook, who considered switching to No. 4, has decided to stick with No. 33 after learning the cost of his unsold jerseys. Per the source, the price tag fell in the range of $1.5 million.

This policy penalizes popular players, since at any given time it’s more likely that Fanatics will have on hand a stockpile of that player’s jersey. And it’s grossly unfair to expect the player to pay retail. At most, he should have to reimburse Fanatics for the production costs.

For players who don’t have much or any in the way of demand for his jersey, there won’t be much or any inventory of unsold jerseys. Which makes it easier for them to change numbers.

Meanwhile, teams don’t have to pay a dime when, for example, cutting a player or trading a player or changing their uniforms. In every case, there’s a supply of unsold jerseys that the team doesn’t have to buy.

72 responses to “Given the cost of buying unsold jerseys, Dalvin Cook will stick with No. 33

  1. Wouldn’t Fanatics sell a bunch of new jerseys? Probably to people who owned the old jerseys too.

    Does the league make Nike or teams buy all the old uniforms when they issue new color schemes every other year?

  2. Thinking I would take it to court . Cook didn’t order the jerseys so why should he have to pay for Fanatics decision on how much inventory they produced .

  3. Don’t they original jerseys become collectors item, to be sold on eBay to the highest bidders? Seems like an investment opportunity to me…

  4. It does make sense to make them pay retail, because the companies could’ve used that time/money to make alternative product instead.

  5. but for fans this is better.. I would be pissed if I just bought a Cook jersey last year or the year before and then he changes his number.. This seems to protect the fans from items they have already spent. Fans should not be penalized because of a league rule.

  6. The policy protects the paying customer who paid a lot of money for that Jersey, only to have the player change numbers after a year or two.

    For once an NFL rule makes sense.

    Popular players going forward will select the number they want.
    And current players can ask to be cut or traded if they are so desperate for a number change.

  7. If Cook was traded elsewhere, Fanatics would still be selling Vikings #33 jerseys for a profit like football fans are unaware that the jersey is now worthless.

  8. Just demand a trade to a team that has your number available. Won‘t cost you that much even if you hold out for few weeks!

  9. Gonna be a lot of non starters with weird numbers – for that reason rule change should go into effect in 2022 if they are determined to go through with it

  10. Stick with your pro number Dalvin, you’ve made your mark with it. I mean you’re on the NFL homepage so you’re already a recognizable star with that jersey. Hopefully your career will last long enough that you’ll have your number retired and go into the HOF with it.

  11. Production costs?? Do you have any idea what it takes to manufacture, warehouse, and distribute $1.5 million dollars worth of jerseys? Not to mention the holding costs and redistribution of the new products. It’s a staggering amount of work. Now multiply the logistics of that by every player that decides to switch. Why should Fanatics have to lose margin just because he wants a different number? Fanatics employs a lot of people who work hard to feed their families and be successful. These guys get paid millions to play a childs game. He can pay retail.

  12. “But…But…These guys are all millionaires!…They can’t afford to buy some jerseys?”

  13. There’s still $1.5M worth of Favre Viking jerseys out there? That’s an unheard of level of franchise quarterback frustration, if a two-year gig with someone else’s leftovers still garners that much attention.

  14. There will be a player who pays this amount or more. If only the NFL would match the players & donate to charity if the precedent was set.

  15. I would seriously consider a challenge to this in court, as a player. Without control of amount of inventory, the player is not able to control the buy out. I can also see where the player could have to pay a Percentage of normal production cost that he would have made by the sales. If he was getting 10% of sales, he should pay 10% of production cost for existing inventory.

  16. Only the NFL could convolute something so much! This is ridiculous!

    And I hate to agree with Tom Brady, but he’s right that it will create unnecessary chaos in game preparations! If all the position player #s are all over the place, how do QBs anticipate and know how to manipulate the plays? Sure, it makes it more interesting, but are owners trying to make the product worse or what?!

    These billionaires meet at posh resorts and make some of the dumbest, least thought-out decisions possible every year!

  17. I get that the player should bare some financial burdern for the unsold jerseys. But full retail is ridiculous, I would guess Fanatics has spent about $150,000 on that $1.5M of backstock jerseys

  18. This reminds me of 25 years ago when the corporation I worked for made a big announcement that we were going business casual full-time.

    The billionaire CEO proudly included in the announcement that we were getting 10% off coupons at Neiman Marcus to help us build our new wardrobes (I am NOT kidding)!

  19. If an NFL player can’t afford to buy his own jersey at retail price, it tells you all you need to know about the price of NFL apparel.

  20. shurmanblog says:
    April 23, 2021 at 12:44 pm
    Thinking I would take it to court . Cook didn’t order the jerseys so why should he have to pay for Fanatics decision on how much inventory they produced

    —–

    Someone doesn’t know anything about licensing and manufacturing agreements – the agreements were made BEFORE the rule change

  21. This is dumb as hell! Lets punish the guys who bring in the money…SMH

    ————————————————————————————————-
    What’s grossly unfair is the average fan that spent their hard earned money on a jersey, only to have it become worthless because a player decided to change his number.

  22. Number would be a good fit because on average he’s healthy for about 4 weeks per season.

  23. Couldn’t Fanatics just send the old-number product to charities for distribution to folks in need, either here in the US or abroad, and take the tax write-off? Like they do with all the “Super Bowl Champion!” merch printed with the logo of the team that lost?

  24. Fanatics is a business and they stocked the jerseys at their risk; I doubt that Cook asked them to.

  25. From another angle, why don’t teams have to pay for all the jersey sales when they trade a player away?

  26. Wow, dumb dumb dumb rule – open numbers up then penalize players for getting a new number?

  27. Players can always buy up the current inventory and send them all free to third world countries for kids to wear that most will never be able to afford the real thing. Pretty sure that’s what I read they do with losing SB teams garments that are pre-made.

  28. Players have a deal with Fanatics that makes them lots of money. The popular players make more money from this deal. Its not rocket surgery.

  29. This issue came up when Chad “Ocho Cinco” Johnson changed his name. He waited a year before changing it on his jersey.

  30. If I was Cook I’d buy every jersey and donate them all o Minneapolis area charities, especially the disadvantaged. Dude just signed a huge new contract and it’ll cost him one game check.

    Come on Dalvin. Do the right thing.

  31. 33 is a great number. It’s been my favorite number since the time I was raised .

  32. cardiovascularendurance says: “From another angle, why don’t teams have to pay for all the jersey sales when they trade a player away?”
    —————-

    Have you seen the jersey contract deal with teams? How do you know they don’t?

  33. It would be in there best interest to cut Dalvin a deal. Now that everyone knows he will probably change numbers next year when there is no longer a stipulation that he buys the old jerseys, very few people will buy a jersey this year. Fanatics will be stuck with them.

  34. It is a ridiculous thing that a player who wishes to play in a different number has to have any consideration for the “on hand stock” at the store selling jerseys. If they changed twice in a year, or multiple times after being drafted but before playing I could see it then. I imagine many teams because of popularity differences order varying quantities. Again, that should have no bearing on a player and what it costs him to change his number. In my opinion

  35. Vikings jerseys.

    For when you just have to tell the world how much you love losing football.

  36. Fanatics isn’t the only jersey seller at risk here – there is a manufacturing/supply chain all the way down to your local store in Dumbsville, OK. The rules should be for next year.

    Think about it in the Amazon Warehouse 2mr

  37. What’s stopping players from changing numbers all the time to get fans to buy new numbers. They do receive money from all sales of jerseys. cook and the rest of these players signed merchandising deals, (which they were paid handsomely), from the warehouse that buys straight from the NFL. I’m guessing they were already paid, (*past tense*) and the language is written into the contract. So stop. Wait the several months and change when it’s feasible.

    But fans better watch out for who they spend on.

  38. Ah. Numbers. I remember my daughter running into a number issue. She moved up into a more competitive league. Her number had always been zero. She chose zero because despite being a talented played she was usually the smallest player. When they told her no single numbers were allowed because it made players stand u from the rest of the team she just grinned and said, OK I’ll take 99. She got attention everywhere we went as the tiny girl with the big number.

  39. And why don’t you think the player should have to pay full retail? Because he’s a player? Do the math, why should Fanatics eat all that money ?

  40. rapntacos says:
    April 23, 2021 at 1:54 pm
    shurmanblog says:
    April 23, 2021 at 12:44 pm
    Thinking I would take it to court . Cook didn’t order the jerseys so why should he have to pay for Fanatics decision on how much inventory they produced

    —–

    Someone doesn’t know anything about licensing and manufacturing agreements – the agreements were made BEFORE the rule change
    ————————————————————————————–
    Someone doesn’t know how the legal system works . The courts have the authority if they so choose to revise or revoke any agreement that comes before them . Based on the exorbitant amount of money Fanatics wanted and the questionable decision to produce such a large inventory Cook would have more then a punchers chance to either get an outright win or a more reasonable buyout of inventory.

  41. Making a big deal about your uniform number just seems immature to me. Not a fan of hair so long that it covers their name either.

  42. How about concentrating on actually playing a full season & hopefully beyond without getting hurt Dalvin.

  43. knightwanderer says:
    April 23, 2021 at 6:42 pm
    It is a ridiculous thing that a player who wishes to play in a different number has to have any consideration for the “on hand stock” at the store selling jerseys.
    ////////
    What, exactly, do you think the NFL is all about? Do you think it’s about sport, fun, camaraderie? The NFL is about money. And name branding and getting people to shell out a ridiculous amount of money is how those billionaires make more money. And tv contracts, and contracts with companies like Fanatics.

    This is about running a $20 billion a year industry. It is not about jerseys, players, or numbers. Unless you count the numbers of dollars. And the NFL owners count a lot of them.

  44. It’s not surprising he has a lot of unsold jerseys. Who wants a jersey of a player with a bad knee.

  45. wischeddar says:
    April 24, 2021 at 1:09 pm
    It’s not surprising he has a lot of unsold jerseys. Who wants a jersey of a player with a bad knee.
    ——-
    There must be some interest because even packer fans post on every story about him.

  46. dlw492 says:

    April 23, 2021 at 1:27 pm

    There will be a player who pays this amount or more. If only the NFL would match the players & donate to charity if the precedent was set.
    —————-
    Seems your pretty confused. Cook isnt paying the nfl, hes paying fanatics as per the licensing agreement(which agreed to when he entered in the nflpa). If a players ego drives them to change numbers and they have to pay a company for that right, why should the nfl or fanatics behave expected to give to charity? Now if Cook wants to pay fanatics the 1.5 million AND then give an additional 1.5 million to charity you’d have a case and an apt comparison.

    This is no different than if a fan wants to buy a players Jersey to wear, he can spend the money it costs at the store or if he doesn’t want to spend it he doesn’t get to wear the jersey, sometimes things arent complicated at all.

  47. Players would probably gain more in their fan base loyalty if they bought the Jerseys and donated them to a charity. Many fans cannot afford a real jersey. How could they go wrong paying it forward?

  48. I do remember fanatics having a “ buyer protection” clause when you buy a jersey that if a players number changes within a year of when you bought your New Jersey, then they have to reimburse or replace with the new one. No doubt this new rule covers them a bit in that.

  49. A better idea would be to pay all the fans who spent their money on jerseys with “old numbers” to replace with new ones. Cook shouldn’t have to pay Fanatic.

  50. FOr those fans that think that it’s unfair to make the player pay for all unsold jerseys, I need to point something out that wasn’t mentioned in the article.

    Players currently get 2/3rds of the profit made from jersey sales. So while charging Cook $1.4 Million if he changes his number sound bad, we have to remember that he likely made many millions of dollars in profit from prior sales.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.