NFL reiterates that injuries away from team facilities expose players to losing their salaries

NFL: SEP 17 Seahawks at Bears
Getty Images

The NFL is saying, “I told you so.”

At at time when the NFL Players Association has urged players to boycott voluntary offseason workouts, the NFL has reminded teams once again that players who suffer season-ending injuries away from team facilities need not be paid their salaries. A memo was sent to all teams today by the NFL, a copy of which PFT has obtained.

“The media recently reported that Denver Broncos player Ja’Wuan James suffered a significant, potentially season-ending injury while working out at a private gym, away from the club’s facility,” the NFL’s management council said in a memo to all teams. “Mr. James’ $10 million Paragraph 5 Salary for the 2021 season was fully guaranteed for skill, injury and cap purposes. [Editor’s note: The salary is actually $9.85 million. James had a $150,000 workout bonus.] Several clubs have inquired about the contractual implications resulting from the fact that Mr. James sustained this season-ending injury while training away from the Broncos’ facility.”

Before we go any farther, there’s an important point to make. It’s likely that no teams inquired about the contractual implications, because all teams know about a rule that, per a source with knowledge of it, has been in place since 1977.

“Injuries sustained while a player is working out ‘on his own’ in a location other than an NFL facility are considered ‘Non-Football Injuries’ and are outside the scope of a typical skill, injury and cap guarantee,” the memo also said. “Such injuries are also not covered by the protections found in paragraph 9 of the NFL Player Contract, meaning that clubs have no contractual obligation to provide salary continuation during the year in which the injury was sustained.”

The memo then explained that injuries suffered “while working out at a club facility or as specifically authorized by his club” give the player “significant protections, including: (i) payment of Paragraph 5 Salary; (ii) medical care; (iii) pension credit (if the player is unable to perform services for three regular season games due to the injury) and (iv) other benefits, such as Injury Protection, which will provide payments to players in seasons following the season of a career ending injury.”

Finally comes the kicker, which is a message not to the teams but to all players: “According to the media coverage, several players have expressed surprise that Mr. James’ injury was not covered by his Injury Guarantee, although this point has been made frequently in our discussions with the NFLPA about the offseason program. Clubs are encouraged to remind players of the significant injury-related protection provided if they choose to work out at the club facility and the risks they undertake in choosing to train in non-NFL locations.”

The NFL is right. Players need to be aware of this. Before yesterday, they weren’t. Now, they have no reason not to be.

22 responses to “NFL reiterates that injuries away from team facilities expose players to losing their salaries

  1. With the millions involved, if my agent didn’t make clear to me that I was risking so much money by not working out at the team facilities, he wouldn’t be my agent going forward.

  2. How come these college graduate players don’t know the facts that a majority of the fans do? That’s on them.

  3. But when Tom Brady calls you to come out to a local high school & run some pass routes, you got a tough decision to make.

  4. This players continue to get bad advice. Selfish advice. The CBA is signed, which was also dumb by the union.

  5. The CBA is a terrible deal for the players in regard to injuries off facility. In order to stay competitive players need to be working out year round, not just during voluntary workouts.

  6. Like with any normal job get hurt at work your covered ,get hurt at home or anyplace else,your on your own.

  7. Would think agents tell players this. This a is a good rebuttal to staying away when you could train at team facilities

  8. I guess a lot of guys will report out of shape, if they don’t want them working out.

  9. The NFLPA should have insurance in place to protect the players. Guys are working out all the time outside of facilities because it’s part of the job to be in the best shape you can. The NFLPA is seriously incompetent.

  10. “The NFL is right. Players need to be aware of this. Before yesterday, they weren’t.”
    .
    .
    if they weren’t, they are ignorant.

  11. Players should buy insurance to cover themselves away from facility. Worth the 1 or 2% of salary it covers

  12. I dont understand this, so players should not work out in the offseason?

  13. “redclaw1314 says:
    May 5, 2021 at 7:37 pm
    The CBA is a terrible deal for the players in regard to injuries off facility. In order to stay competitive players need to be working out year round, not just during voluntary workouts”

    Team facilities are open all year. They can come and go as they please and workout and be protected and not lose salary if injured.

  14. Would love to see the rate of players who get injured away from facilities versus in the actual facilities. Sometimes narratives are more powerful than the truth

  15. Huh? Millions of people are working remotely. Training is part of their job. There’s a huge grey area here.

  16. charliecharger says:
    May 5, 2021 at 9:44 pm
    I guess a lot of guys will report out of shape, if they don’t want them working out.
    ………………………………………………………………………….
    well if that happens then i guess a lot of guys will be looking for a new job come setpember

  17. Clarify this for me… what happens if they get into a car accident? Got sick? Cut their hand while making dinner one night? How can it be possible (or legal) to void a contract due to a freak accident?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.