Patrick Mahomes calls for microchips in footballs to improve officiating

Super Bowl LV
Getty Images

Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes wants the NFL to go high tech to improve officiating.

The NFL has a microchip in every football as part of its data tracking, and bits of that data are sometimes revealed to the public through the league’s Next Gen Stats. But Mahomes says the chip should also be used to alert the officials to when a ball crosses a goal line.

“I’ve always thought the chip in the ball has to happen sometime, where if you cross the line, it just tells you a touchdown,” Mahomes said on the WHOOP podcast, via the Kansas City Star. “The biggest thing to me is when they get in the pile by the end zone, there is literally no way to tell if he’s in the end zone or not. It’s like you said, it’s just whatever they call. … I’m sure it’ll happen soon enough.”

The problem, however, is that on most touchdown calls, the question is not just, Did the ball cross the goal line? The question is usually, Which happened first, the ball crossing the goal line or the runner’s knee touching the ground? And a chip in the ball can’t answer that question. Even if the NFL used an instant replay system that benefited from a microchip that told the replay official exactly when the ball crossed the goal line, that wouldn’t necessarily help the official figure out when the runner, whose knee is obscured by a pile of players, went down.

So a microchip in a football might help with some replay reviews, but it wouldn’t necessarily be the major fix that Mahomes is hoping for.

93 responses to “Patrick Mahomes calls for microchips in footballs to improve officiating

  1. Not sure about that one. What if the refs need to blow a last minute decision that effects the entire season of a team?

  2. I’ve been saying this for years! Run sensor lines down the sidelines. Use the Hawkeye technology wherever possible. Apply anything to enhance accuracy. Baseball should use an electronic strike zone too. To hell with “the human element.” It’s time to move into the space age.

  3. I’m afraid I have to disagree MDS. The chip will let the officials know if the ball ever crossed the end zone and at what time. Officials can use the chip information to their benefit during a replay to see what time the player’s knee was down compared to what time the chip showed the player crossed the end zone.

  4. But it can answer WHEN it crossed the goal line and with the timestamp on the camera views this can be a piece to the puzzle…..

  5. Okay I can see his logic of being in a pile of bodies at the goal line. That is about the only situation I would agree with. Now lets talk further about the pile, what would be next microchips in knee pads to see if the knee was down in the pile before the ball crossed the goal line. I do believe this needs discussion at the next owners meetings.

  6. i mean it registering the moment the ball touched the goalline, and then knowing the time at which you need to see if the knee was down, is much better than seeing the knee not being down and the commentators go “well we dont know where the ball is”

  7. With the way the league is trending, they will soon adopt a rule that if a player is down anywhere inside the 20 yard line, and that player signals touchdown, it’s six points.

  8. Problem solved:

    Simply place a chip in each player’s kneepad, send a small electrical charge throughout the fie so when the knee hits the field the chip is activated and alerts the ref. That synchronized with the chip on the ball will not only perfect the game but will also add hours of hair pulling and gut wrenching time to make those moronic decisions when the game should be in the process of being played.

    Honestly now. Return the game to the fans and refs, make the instant replay go away so we can enjoy the game again run and played by imperfect people.

  9. But Patrick, don’t you know it’s a foregone conclusion that football fans (and pundits) hate change?

  10. Why not use a chip? It won’t solve the “did the knee touch the ground first” question, but it certain situations the chip could he helpful. Can’t think of a reason not to use it.

  11. If evolution is real we should as humans be able to tell it a football crossed a line in 2021.

  12. It really would be a major improvement. Instead of narrowly focusing on the goal line consider the placement of the ball any time there is a question of whether the runner gained enough to move the sticks. That happens at least 5-6 times per game and the refs either just say the offense did/didn’t get the 1st down (pissing off the fans of the team the refs ruled against) or they do a 2 minute dog and pony show involving chains and sticks. Sometimes they even move the ball right before measuring–which is infuriating all the way around as it exposes the pure randomness of the process.

    Microchipping the ball will make the ruling accurate AND instant. No more dog and pony show. It is true enough that the refs will still have to determine that the ball carrier had possession, wasn’t down by contact and so forth….but there won’t be any question as to how far the ball was ultimately advanced.

    Don’t let great (perfect system) be the enemy of good (better system).

  13. WOn’t work, unless the ball IS the microchip. If you put the chip by the laces, you won’t know if the nose of the ball crosses the plane. If you put the chip in one end, you won’t know if the other end crosses.

    Sounds easy and modern, but it’s anything but.

  14. If the NFL put microchips in footballs, there’s a certain team, (who shall remain nameless), who will try to manipulate the technology.

  15. If Patrick says to do it, well, do it.
    He’s not just a pretty face, just sayin’

  16. There are other uses for the chip that could improve the game. For example, it could be used to do away with the chain gang and ensure the ball is accurately spotted after each play.

  17. He’s asking for magic technology that does not exist (at least for football because there is way more factors that would need to happen for this to work than what’s stated in the article). The field itself would also have to be upgraded with censors to recognize the balls location and a program would have to be created to calculate that info to know where the ball started and where it eventually ends and when. Especially since the officials whistle is what stops the play and not the balls location unlike baseball that can use microchips to know if the pitch is a ball or strike.

  18. Then . . . microchips in the knees, microchips under the turf, microchips in the goal posts, microchips everywhere. BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING.

  19. If you can put a chip in a football, you can put a chip anywhere in a player’s uniform as well.

  20. It’s a good thought, but in addition to the question of “when” the ball crossed, I don’t know that the tech is there to get that precise with the location. We are talking a fraction of an inch. The only way I know to get that kind of accuracy is some kind of optical system (like has been developed in soccer). The issue with that is the ball is often obscured in football (so cameras won’t work, nor would a laser beam). I’m not sure links are allowed, but there is a good Smithsonian Mag article about this. It’s titled “Ball Tracking Tech for (American) Football.”

  21. Nobody’s saying it would solve 100% of the issues when it comes to refs spotting the ball but it would solve a lot more than you seem to be giving it credit for. If it could electronically signal when the ball crosses the goal line, for example, the replay official can go to that exact moment in the replay and look for the player’s knees/hips/etc. Will he have a clear view of the guy? Perhaps not always, but a LOT of the time it would help to know that the ball actually got in and when.

  22. I think Mahomes, and the rest of us who just watch football, would feel better about every called made by the officials if we felt like the NFL was doing everything it could to get every call right. Right now, it feels like the NFL is willing to try everything but the one thing that would satisfy everyone.
    Make. Every. Call. Subject. To. Challenge.
    Coaches still only get two challenges a game, and a third if they hit on the first two. Problem solved.

  23. I like the concept, but I am skeptical that this won’t create new issues.

  24. I believe you just answered your own question with your very own question, sir. The solution is simple: put microchips in everyone’s knees!

  25. How is it a problem?
    Right now you have to determine both when the ball crosses and when the knee touches at the bottom of a pile.
    With the chip you only have to figure when the knee touches in relation to the exact time the ball crosses the line…..usually the largest congestion is around the ball, not the knee.
    So yes, it would make it easier and the official can concentrate his focus on the player being down….not on the ball….or both.

  26. If it gives you the answer to wether the ball crossed the line or not, then the refs only have to go by when the players was down. I’m for anything that improves accuracy and speed. 2 things refs desperately are missing.

  27. obviously there’d be chips on both noses of the football, but what about the sides? you’d need a ring of chips around the ball so if it goes in sideways like when a runner is carrying it with both arms covering the ball up for security

  28. I think Mahomes is definitely a future hall of famer, but I’m think he needs to stop talking at times. To many things happen that can nullify a touchdown even though the ball crossed. Anything close is reviewed. Stick with that.

  29. Then we would also need chips in the uniforms/on the players (knees, elbows, cleats, etc) to solve your issue. Will be a while, but its coming.

  30. The chip in the ball actually CAN help answer the question of whether the runner’s knee was down first or not. How? Well, all the cameras in a stadium are linked to timecode. If the microchips are also linked to timecode, then all those slow-mo replays can include the timecode with a huge TD signal or something at the exact moment the ball crosses the plane. Knowing the exact micro-second the ball crosses the plane will make it much easier to determine — in those slow-mo replays — whether the runner’s knee was down at the time or not.

  31. Microchips in footballs and on uniforms. There is zero reason inefficient zebras are needed in this game anymore.

  32. Where is the chip? Like…where within the 3-dimensional confines of the ball? Since it’s a micro chip it could be anywhere, but part of the ball might pass over the goal line without the chip passing over. Or do you have two chips: on at each tip? Or four, or six?

    The point about “not whether, but when” is completely valid. This chip would help with very few calls, in reality. And even if it does…what are we really talking about here?

    A game. It’s a game, Patrick. Just be glad you get to play another down and score a goal.

    Shut up and play, basically. Quit trying to “fix” the game it’s broken enough with all the rule changes that have been made to benefit the offense.

  33. You would have to cover the entire ball in a micro chip to see if any section of the ball crossed the line. This microchip would have to have an unobstructed connection with a laser line of some sort at the goal line. How would you have an unobstructed goal line with 16 interior guys over this goal line. Dumb idea.

  34. “Which happened first, the ball crossing the goal line or the runner’s knee touching the ground? And a chip in the ball can’t answer that question.”

    The answer to that is simple, chips in kneepads, elbowpads etc for all the players.

  35. It might not necessarily be the major fix that Mahomes is hoping for but it will be a fix for a significant amount of calls. Even if it’s just one call in a season, if it was oh, I don’t know, the game winning TD on the last play of a game that decides a playoff spot, who gets the first round bye or a conference championship game, isn’t it worth it?

  36. 50Stars says:
    May 21, 2021 at 9:04 am
    You would have to cover the entire ball in a micro chip to see if any section of the ball crossed the line. This microchip would have to have an unobstructed connection with a laser line of some sort at the goal line. How would you have an unobstructed goal line with 16 interior guys over this goal line. Dumb idea.

    —————–

    The entire skin of the ball can be made a sensor connected to a chip. Its quite simple actually

  37. rickyfin says:
    May 21, 2021 at 8:54 am
    I think Mahomes is definitely a future hall of famer, but I’m think he needs to stop talking at times. To many things happen that can nullify a touchdown even though the ball crossed. Anything close is reviewed. Stick with that.
    ———————-
    Ah, but see, there is the problem. Not ‘anything close is reviewed’. If it is called a TD on the field and questionable, it is usually reviewed. But, if they are ruled short of the TD, there is no automatic review. Then, it falls on a team to try to guess if it is close enough to waste a challenge, if they even have on left. That is why the refs (whether one in a booth, or even those on the field), should have the option to say something is too close and they should review it. But, there is currently no option outside of the last two minutes of a half (or OT) for any ref to initiate a review.

  38. Why do people think you need multiple chip all over the inside of the ball? You wouldn’t have to have a chip in every corner of the football. Theoretically, it could work the same way a dog collar works. You could have a single chip planted anywhere inside the ball connecting to a simple mesh in the cover. It could then trip a signal at the goal line.

  39. 50Stars says: “This microchip would have to have an unobstructed connection with a laser line of some sort at the goal line. How would you have an unobstructed goal line with 16 interior guys over this goal line. Dumb idea.”
    ——————

    One, you can program two RFID microchips to encompass the entire dimensions of a football, including the laces.

    Two. You don’t need line-of-sight lasers. That’s 60’s technology. All stadiums already have 25 ultra-wide band receivers and as of 2020, at least 250 RFID tags are in use EVERY game.

    Three. Yes, the idea is still dumb.

  40. here’s a thought…. just hire and train full time referee’s that are competent. I mean the season goes from August to February, I think you can find ways to keep these guys working/training/time off for the other 5 months. Not everything has to be “perfect” and scrutinized…. just give a good clean effort and call a good game. The mistakes are just that, mistakes. Keep the human element in the game!!! I absolutely HATE that I have to wait 30 seconds to minute after a big play to make sure there isn’t some sort of “outside” affect on the play. Keep it between the lines and use re-play in rare instances

  41. ghost says:
    May 21, 2021 at 6:54 am
    But it can answer WHEN it crossed the goal line and with the timestamp on the camera views this can be a piece to the puzzle…..
    ///////
    Exactly. And, it could also help with whether the ball was inside the pylon when the player dives for the corner of the end zone. How many times does that happen in a season? I would think at least a couple dozen times, if not more.

  42. gokafilm says:
    May 21, 2021 at 7:13 am

    Microchip their knees

    —–

    Dan Campbell eats chips for breakfast.

  43. There won’t be any knees to microchip when Dan Campbell and the Lions are done with you..

  44. Ya then we can have an entire staff of IT people in the stands tracking the ball and spend an eternity making a call. What a dump idea.

  45. Instead of a goal line, have a checkout line.
    Make the ball a h8ant QR code and make the front of the line a giant reader…..how you do that am not sure, based on the frequency of that reader. But it’s a touchdown once the ball is ‘read’.

    That would bring an other worldly dimension to the game.

    Am joking of course…..but there is a way to not only make such a tech a nuance but making it a big and new part of the game and how it’s played.

  46. “Microchip their knees”
    ____________

    That is actually far simpler and certain than the ball idea. The rules make microchipping the ball a rather tough proposition. You don’t need to fully break the plane and have the entire ball across the goal line; you only need any part of the ball to TOUCH the line. So, they’d have to have the ball so finely tuned you could tell its PRECISE location when facing in any direction, never missing a time the ball did touch the line but also having no leeway the other direction because they also couldn’t have any false positives.

  47. There are already chips in every players’ shoulder pads & helmets, why not the ball as well for goal line & 1st down positioning. Get rid of the archaic chain gang & have accurate ball placement? Would make TD’s fool-proof both at the goal line & pylons.

  48. How does a chip in the ball even tell that a touchdown has occurred given that a TD is awarded as soon as any part of the ball touches the plane of the goal line? Depending upon the orientation of the ball in the runner’s hands and the location of the chip in the ball, it seems that you could easily have a situation where the TD is actually scored but the chip never crossed the goal line.

  49. MortimerInMiami says:

    He’s still trying to avoid the Bucs defense!

    ———————————–
    You mean that same one hit lit up for nearly 300 yards and 3 TD’s in the first quarter when he had a healthy offensive line?

  50. I’m out on the microchips. We can’t completely remove the human element from the game.
    It’s sanitized and stopped and analyzed enough as it is.

    At some point you need to let them play.

    There will always be controversy ……and that needs to be ok.

  51. It’s really never been an issue telling whether the ball crossed or not. With the end zone cameras it’s easy to tell. It’s all about determining whether knees are down or feet out of bounds. Chips can’t tell us that.

  52. People are overthinking this a lot. Using technology to track the 3-dimensional location and position of an object is easy. That’s all this would be doing.

  53. I can’t even comment. I’m having too much fun reading the comments by others. SO FUN !

  54. he is 100% correct. The NFL knows this as well, but “tin hat” tells me they want the control, therefore we are still many years away from this happening.
    I mean, look how after all these years, they finally put in a goal post camera. A Multi-billion dollar company and you don’t have a camera focused directly along the goal line at all times?!

  55. Maybe something like this could be possible someday, but the current tech doesn’t work that way. If the ball is at the bottom of the pile, the signal (radio) would have to pass through human bodies, which DOES NOT work. Also, the tech is very accurate (up to 6″ accurate), way better than GPS, but not accurate enough for this application. Also, there’s only one chip in the ball, and it’s in the middle, close to the laces. So, if the nose of the ball breaks the plane, the chip still doesn’t. Finally, the sensors that ‘hear’ the chips are up along the ribbon panel / second deck of seating. It’s not feasible for them to be on the sidelines for a number of reasons.

  56. Just let robots play, why use humans at all. Better yet just play Madden, it will tell you if you scored. Put micro chips in the gloves and bodies of boxers too, then you can tell if they really got hit or maybe they should be robots too.

  57. You could use two chips. One at each tip of the ball. Using GPS and math data of the ball you could get the exact position of the ball relative to the field. Things to address are refresh rate and computation speed.

  58. All I hear is complaints about officiating, and about bad calls. There is a lot of technology that the NFL refuses to utilize that could help get the games better officiated. The teams fly from one coast to the other. They don’t travel by horse and buggy. I have no problem using inventions that make life easier. If you don’t like technology, don’t complain about the refs. It’s humanly impossible to get every call right.

  59. To hell with “the human element.” It’s time to move into the space age.
    ____________

    We’ll remember you said that when a robot takes your job.

    Also, for everyone wanting to chip the knee pads… have you seen where the knee pads are lined up on some of these guys pants? Above the knee usually. Even if you correct that, how does the chip know it touched the field and not another players helmet, body, pads, etc.?

  60. stellarperformance says:
    May 21, 2021 at 6:27 am
    I’ve been saying this for years! Run sensor lines down the sidelines. Use the Hawkeye technology wherever possible. Apply anything to enhance accuracy. Baseball should use an electronic strike zone too. To hell with “the human element.” It’s time to move into the space age.

    —-

    It’s not that simple, For example, how will they track when a guy’s knee is down relative to when the ball crosses a line? They would need the players themselves outfitted with chips to track their relative positions.

  61. It’s actually pretty simple: Use lasers to create a plane at the front of the goal line, then in replay watch to see if the laser hits the ball. Won’t solve the “ball at the bottom of a pileup” or the “ball crossing the line before the knee” issues, but given that we’re all accustomed to the electronic 1st down line, a laser-plane is a no-brainer.

  62. The “chip in the ball” could tell everyone if the ball crossed the goal line, but it can’t say whether a knee or other body part was down BEFORE the ball crossed the goal line….or if the whistle blew BEFORE the ball crossed the line, but I think it will still be useful.

    I think having that chip in the ball will help…and anything that improves the calls made by the refs is a good thing.

  63. Since I thought of this over a decade ago Ive also come up with way to ensure to the correct call.

    First down chains will contain sensors as well as pylons along with the each tip of the football.

    As soon as the ball is snapped a sensor timer goes off measuring to the thousandths in seconds.

    Then the sensor determines and records the exact moment the ball crosses the endzone or first down marker. If a knees down you pause the replay, take a peak at the clock and make the ruling.

    So yes a chip could essentially determine precisely when a ball crosses the goal line.

  64. “Use lasers to create a plane at the front of the goal line,”

    We already have cameras right at the goal line. Since lasers would require a clear line of sight to work, they would be no better than the cameras they now have.

  65. More information is always better than less when making critical decisions. The fact that the balls ARE ALREADY CHIPPED all it would take is a programming patch to get this information. Minimal cost for critical information that can improve the game.

  66. nhpats2011 says:
    May 21, 2021 at 12:02 pm
    It’s not that simple, For example, how will they track when a guy’s knee is down relative to when the ball crosses a line? They would need the players themselves outfitted with chips to track their relative positions.
    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    I’m interested in improving what they have. You can’t make it infallible. If the ref doesn’t need to concern themselves with the advancement of the ball, they can focus on other things like knees.

  67. He’s getting ahead of himself.
    Here it is, 2021, and we STILL don’t know what constitutes a catch.

  68. They would at least know the ball was in the endzone and could then check for knees. Officials don’t want to be shown up regardless of the sport. Many times the official is emphatically pointing down at the ground to say yhe runner didn’t get in to the endzone.

  69. seems to me it wouldn’t be a bad idea for the NFL to try this unofficially. cop the balls, but don’t add their data to the games, just analyze it. after a year, review the data… if there is a significant difference in the games outcome, add it, if not, try a couple more years for more data.

  70. addmy2cents says:
    May 21, 2021 at 10:25 am
    MortimerInMiami says:

    He’s still trying to avoid the Bucs defense!

    ———————————–
    You mean that same one hit lit up for nearly 300 yards and 3 TD’s in the first quarter when he had a healthy offensive line?

    ———————-

    Yes, the same one he ran for his life when it counted in the Super Bowl. Yeah, that one.

  71. The first thing this article made me think of is the glowing hockey pucks the NHL used a few decades back… that worked out well.

  72. So what happens if those chips detect air loss during the time the football is in play? Does Brady get his 4 game suspension erased from his record, and his money back along with an apology from the league, or does science not matter when the object was always something other than the facts?

  73. It’s not as simple as posters think. You can’t just put a chip in and incorporate a mesh linked to the chip. Look up Faraday cage to see why.

  74. It’s inspiring and a bit humbling to see so many PFT commenters who are leading experts in the field of microchip technology.

  75. My question is where in the ball would the chip be placed? If it is on one tip and the opposite tip is the part that crosses the goal line, which call would be the correct one? The chips call that it didn’t cross or the ref’s call the other tip did?

  76. TheDPR says:
    May 21, 2021 at 8:29 am
    Nobody’s saying it would solve 100% of the issues when it comes to refs spotting the ball but it would solve a lot more than you seem to be giving it credit for. If it could electronically signal when the ball crosses the goal line, for example, the replay official can go to that exact moment in the replay and look for the player’s knees/hips/etc. Will he have a clear view of the guy? Perhaps not always, but a LOT of the time it would help to know that the ball actually got in and when.
    ——————————————————————————

    But this is the issue: I’m not sure it’s currently possible to have a system that tells us exactly when it crossed the goal line, or if it touches the plane. An optical system wouldn’t work because of the ball being obscured quite a bit. An RF or GPS system doesn’t have that kind of accuracy. It’s a lot more complicated than just “putting a microchip in the ball.” You’d have to know when the nose of the balls touches. And you’d have to account for every possible orientation of the ball as it crosses. So you’d need many, many chips in the ball, and they’d have to interact with the goal line/plane in some way.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.