NCAA has no choice but to open the NIL floodgates

2021 NCAA Division I Football Championship
Getty Images

The clock has been ticking for the NFL. The alarm is now going off.

Monday’s narrow ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court and broad warning in a concurring opinion from Justice Brett Kavanaugh puts the NCAA on notice. Any restriction on the ability of individuals to get compensated, directly or indirectly, will come under attack.

The easiest move for the NCAA will be to abandon all restrictions regarding athletes separately profiting from their names, images, and likenesses. The right move, for decades, has been to do it. The reasoning articulated by the Supreme Court makes it clear that the NCAA has no reason (and never had one) to slam the door on the ability of athletes to generate revenue for themselves — especially if the revenue isn’t coming from the coffers of the colleges.

Via Dennis Dodd of CBSSports.com, the NCAA Council will meet today and tomorrow regarding the NIL issue, barely a week before laws become effective in multiple states allowing players to market their names, images, and likenesses. As Dodd explains it, the NCAA has hoped for federal legislation that would create uniform rules and, more importantly, provide the NCAA with protection against antitrust lawsuits. With Congress unable to get a law passed before July 1, the NCAA has to decide whether to maintain a rule that CLEARLY violates antitrust laws by clumsily preserving the amateur status of athletes and, in turn, price-fixing its labor force.

Already, a nationwide class should immediately should be filed attacking the NCAA’s anti-NIL rules. The liability becomes even more obvious if/when multiple states allow athletes to make money from their names, images, and likenesses as of July 1 — and the world of college sports keeps spinning.

Remember, the NCAA’s best argument for refusing to allow players to make money is that the fans supposedly want their college athletes to be unpaid. The fair-minded fans don’t care; even if they did, Justice Kavanaugh showed how stupid that argument is with his passage from his concurring opinion: “The NCAA’s business model would be flatly illegal in almost any other industry in America. All of the restaurants in a region cannot come together to cut cooks’ wages on the theory that ‘customers prefer’ to eat food from low-paid cooks. Law firms cannot conspire to cabin lawyers’ salaries in the name of providing legal services out of a ‘love of the law.’ Hospitals cannot agree to cap nurses’ income in order to create a ‘purer’ form of helping the sick. News organizations cannot join forces to curtail pay to reporters to preserve a ‘tradition’ of public-minded journalism. Movie studios cannot collude to slash benefits to camera crews to kindle a ‘spirit of amateurism’ in Hollywood.”

And the NCAA can no longer avoid sharing its billions in revenue with those who earn it by creating blanket rules that block not only payments from the universities but also any other money that an athlete can make by virtue of being an athlete.

Here’s hoping the antitrust lawsuit on past NIL prohibition gets filed today — if it hasn’t already been filed. Here’s hoping that it’s just the beginning. The NCAA, the universities, and their highest-paid employees have continued to rake in millions at the expense of the players despite a clear and obvious violation of the antitrust laws. It’s time for the reckoning. It’s time for an accounting. It’s time to make it right, both looking forward and backward, at least as far as the statutes of limitations will allow.

17 responses to “NCAA has no choice but to open the NIL floodgates

  1. and just like that college athletics has been reduced to basketball, football, baseball, and hockey in some schools. sure football and basketball make millions for the school, but some of that money is used to fund other athletic programs.

  2. There is nothing more dirty, diabolical and/or duplicitous on this planet than a rich man parted from their money. And there’s a whole lot of rich dudes who are about to have stacks taken from their pockets.

  3. About time. The next step is to pass Sen. Booker’s Player’s Bill of Rights

    Booker’s College Athletes Bill of Rights guarantees NCAA players monetary compensation, long-term health care, lifetime educational scholarships and even revenue sharing. It would virtually dissolve national letters of intent, bar coaches and administrators from influencing an athlete’s academic decisions, and create a medical trust fund.

    Personally, I’d like an NIL system where players could negotiate anything based upon their NIL but 75% would go to them, 10% would go to the University mentioned, 10% would be split among other athletes at their University, and 5% would go to the NCAA.

  4. For good or bad college sports will become a lower level of the Pros. Paying for the use of their images is an opening for wealthy boosters to funnel money to players in order to get them to play for their school. There will be 25 or less college football teams that are relevant and maybe the same number of basketball teams. The other teams will become farm teams because once they have a player who managed to slip through the cracks have some success, they will use the transfer portal to go to a higher paying program.

  5. Let’s not forget, the majority of those youngsters in money making sports, we are required to work for free, are black

  6. Long overdue, this should have been a matter of conscience on the part of the NCAA and should not have had to be decided by a court.

  7. That completely opens the door for Colleges and Boosters to filter money to the players for coming to their School. College Sports is essentially going to be professional sports from here on out. I Can’t see how anybody could think this is good for college football.

  8. I actually agree that they should be able to make money off their likeness, but this constant push for litigation and making the man pay all the time gets really old. I see why lawyers are synonymous with snakes.

  9. snowdood163 says:
    June 22, 2021 at 9:02 am

    I actually agree that they should be able to make money off their likeness, but this constant push for litigation and making the man pay all the time gets really old. I see why lawyers are synonymous with snakes.

    ****************************

    Oh, sure, because the NCAA was going to be fair to the athletes without litigation. The real snakes are the NCAA. I still remember 50 years ago when a friend of mine got in trouble with the NCAA because he won a case of Coke in a little local golf tournament.

  10. “There will be 25 or less college football teams that are relevant”

    Um… Depending on your definition of relevant, we’ve already been there for a decade or so.

  11. Still waiting to find out how the ‘clock has been ticking on the NFL, now the alarm bells are going off’.

  12. If players wish to make money off their names, likeness, etc, while in college, no problem!

    Colleges should just not give those players scholarships (athletic) or any other assistance. Let the players who are now making money pay for their own schooling.

  13. Oh, sure, because the NCAA was going to be fair to the athletes without litigation. The real snakes are the NCAA. I still remember 50 years ago when a friend of mine got in trouble with the NCAA because he won a case of Coke in a little local golf tournament.

    ————————

    Your “friend” agreed to the rules….

  14. Those folks thinking that Power 5 conferences aren’t going to offer scholarships to top athletes just to be punitive should take a step back from being small-minded and petty. Alabama, Clemson, Florida, Texas, etc are not going to ask the Top high-school QB, RB, DL, WR, etc to pay one dime for a scholarship to attend college and play for their schools.

    Also the idea that football and basketball players should sacrifice to pay for non-revenue sports is hypocritical at best.

    Unfortunately, most if not all of the posters in these threads are content to work for low wages to enrich others and happy to try and ensure that college athletes do the same.

  15. twofourfourthree says:
    June 22, 2021 at 12:31 pm

    Unfortunately, most if not all of the posters in these threads are content to work for low wages to enrich others and happy to try and ensure that college athletes do the same.
    ________________________

    We do it every single day. It’s called welfare, social security, subsidies and a whole lot of other names politcians use to try to cover up the fact that their programs are wealth redistribution schemes.

    There’s a HUGE number of Bernie supporters on this site that will be downvoting this post because they believe 100% in communism, owing primarily to the fact that they haven’t made anything of their lives and now they want other people to pay to feed, shelter and clothe them and their kids.

    But you’re comparing apples to oranges, because at last the athletes get an education out of the deal. All WE get is more and more people voting to take more and more money from us.

  16. The NCAA “never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity” as far as compensation for players is concerned. Their whole existence is build upon a financial model that depends on the virtually free labor that the players provide (and spare me the ‘tuition, room, books and board” bromide). While it likely will take a lot take more time, Justice Kavanaugh’s comment is a direct shot across the bow of the NCAA, and if they don’t get ahead of what’s coming, they will be doomed, ultimately. But, then again, they have consistently failed to lead on countless other issues, so why should this be any different?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.