Daniel Snyder’s lawyer disputes Washington Post report on reinstatement to day-to-day control

Getty Images

Thursday’s announcement of the penalties arising from years of workplace misconduct within the Washington Football Team included a very confusing element relating to the powers of owner Daniel Snyder. It’s now even more confusing.

The statement from the league had buried at the very bottom an assertion that “Tanya Snyder will assume responsibilities for all day-to-day team operations and represent the club at all league meetings and other league activities for at least the next several months,” and that “Dan Snyder will concentrate on a new stadium plan and other matters.”

It felt like a suspension that wasn’t called a suspension. Both the team and the league, however, insisted that the move by Daniel Snyder was “voluntary.”

Then, Mark Maske of the Washington Post reported that Commissioner Roger Goodell “must approve Daniel Snyder’s return to daily control.” This assertion obviously does not mesh with the notion that Snyder voluntarily stepped aside. If he walked away on his own, he can return whenever he wants.

Last night, an effort was made to get us to delete our story based on Maske’s tweet. It became clear that Snyder’s representatives were working both with the league and the Post to get the Maske report changed or erased. Our position was, and is, that our story will change only if: (1) Maske retracts his story; (2) the Commissioner refutes the Maske report on the record; or (3) Snyder refutes the Maske report on the record.

On Friday afternoon, Snyder’s lawyer, Jordan Siev, has issued a statement to ESPN refuting Maske’s report.

“Any suggestion that Commissioner Goodell must approve Dan Snyder’s return to daily control is false,” Siev said. “Dan was not suspended, so by definition he does not need to be reinstated to any position.”

Maske routinely breaks news on league matters, and he clearly has a highly-placed source at 345 Park Avenue. Maske has not retracted or changed his story. Neither Goodell nor anyone from the league has refuted Maske’s report.

To summarize, Maske has reported that Goodell must approve Snyder’s return to day-to-day control of the team. Maske has not retracted his report. Goodell has not refuted the report. Snyder has not personally refuted it; his lawyer has.

Snyder wants the public to think he chose to step aside and thus can return whenever he wants. He apparently believes he has that right. Time will tell whether Goodell agrees with that. Based on Maske’s report and the silence from the league office, Goodell quite possibly does not.

11 responses to “Daniel Snyder’s lawyer disputes Washington Post report on reinstatement to day-to-day control

  1. Well, excuse me, but I am a might confused. Why is Dan Snyder being punished when there was never a report from the investigator (according to the NFL). Then again, how does an investigation that costs millions of dollars not end up with a report? And if there was no report, then how does the NFL know what to punish Dan for? Is this like Mueller’s Investigation that AG Barr said did not conclude that Trump did anything wrong when Mueller sure did say that Trump did many things wrong? Or is this like Alice when she fell down the rabbit hole? Or did I fall down the rabbit hole? This is getting confusier and confusier by the minute. No, make that by the nanosecond.

  2. So the “punishment’ is even more of a travesty than we thought! He basically handed over some pocket change and made statements not actually taking personal responsibility.

    Unbelievable!

  3. Bezos owns Washington Post. Bezos wants to buy WFT. Another hit job on Snyder by Bezos.

  4. Wayoutleftfield says:

    July 2, 2021 at 5:20 pm

    Well, excuse me, but I am a might confused. Why is Dan Snyder being punished when there was never a report from the investigator (according to the NFL). Then again, how does an investigation that costs millions of dollars not end up with a report? And if there was no report, then how does the NFL know what to punish Dan for? Is this like Mueller’s Investigation that AG Barr said did not conclude that Trump did anything wrong when Mueller sure did say that Trump did many things wrong? Or is this like Alice when she fell down the rabbit hole? Or did I fall down the rabbit hole? This is getting confusier and confusier by the minute. No, make that by the nanosecond.
    ———
    Well when you write “confusier and confusier” its obvious you need simple things explained to you. Not every report is written, it’s called a verbal report.

  5. Can you imagine if the media actually did its job and investigated Goodell and his schemes?

    Imagine what his emails and phone would look like?

  6. It’s a privately run business. Common rules do not apply and we are not entitled to know what goes on. If there was some handshake agreement that Snyder pay a fine to sweep this under the rug then that’s that.

  7. Meanwhile Pats fans and the Pats ownership are giving the WFT a silent golfclap and saying well done.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.