NFL says NFL Media layoffs “not markedly different” from previous offseasons

Culver City Exteriors And Landmarks - 2021
Getty Images

When former 14-year employee of NFL Media Andy Fenelon tweeted that the organization recently laid off 132 people, including him, that seemed significant. After initially not commenting on the record, a league spokesperson has provided a statement.

“Every offseason, NFL Media makes staffing adjustments for the upcoming season, which results in some positions being eliminated — nowhere near the wildly inaccurate figure circulating on social media — and some being hired, which we expect to announce in the very near future,” the statement explains. “What we have seen this summer isn’t markedly different than in previous offseasons.”

A prior report suggested that the league would trim 10 percent of the NFL Media workforce. The statement from the league did not provide a specific number or a percentage.

Presumably, the “wildly inaccurate figure” to which the statement refers is the one Fenelon supplied on Twitter. However, Fenelon’s 132 matches the number that a tipster provided to PFT on July 7, characterizing the layoffs as “NFL Network and NFL Digital employees in Los Angeles,” and that the layoffs affected “all levels” from Vice Presidents to managers. (We hadn’t posted anything about it, because we had yet to confirm or debunk the information.)

Regardless, the league’s position is that: (1) not nearly as many as 132 were let go; (2) it’s part of the normal offseason cycle; and (3) new hires will be announced soon.

1 responses to “NFL says NFL Media layoffs “not markedly different” from previous offseasons

  1. If this is true it tells you all you need to know about why the NFL is looking for a media partner to run this business. There’s no way they should be needing to make adjustments like that every single offseason. They have a very stable business with a locked-in calendar where they know exactly when all their major events are happening, literally YEARS out. If they have a lot of temporary 9-month jobs why wouldn’t they be filling those with contractors? Or structuring the jobs to account for thost empty few months like how teachers and other similar jobs work? Instead they lay somebody off and within a few months are hiring again for that same position? And most likely probably hiring back the exact same people they’d just laid off? That’s nuts.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.