NFL should promptly decide whether Richard Sherman will be subject to paid leave

NFL: SEP 13 Cardinals at 49ers
Getty Images

Two years ago, after the Patriots released receiver Antonio Brown, the league refused to inform teams as to whether he’d be placed on paid leave, if signed by another club. That resulted in no one signing Brown, because no one knew with any degree of certainty whether they’d be paying him to not play. Thus, as a practical matter, he served a 14-game unpaid suspension in 2019.

With free-agent cornerback Richard Sherman, who was released without bail on Thursday, facing four misdemeanor charges arising from Wednesday’s domestic incident, a similar guessing-game could now unfold as to his availability. It shouldn’t. With camps opening soon, the league should make a quick and efficient determination as to whether he’ll be cleared to play, and it should let all teams know his status.

The fact that he faces no felony charges and no one suffered injury in the incident suggests that paid leave would not be appropriate in this case. However, the policy has sufficient breadth and discretion to permit the Commissioner to invoke paid leave. Indeed, paid leave can apply not only when physical force is used to injure a person but simply to threaten. The video of Sherman slamming his body into the door of his in-laws’ home could be categorized that way by the league office. The policy also allows paid leave for any “conduct that poses a genuine danger to the safety or well-being of another person.”

So paid leave becomes an option, and the policy would allow it. The point for now is that the league should decide sooner rather than later whether Sherman would be placed on paid leave if signed by a team, and the league should let it be known. Absent clarity as to whether he’d be paid to not play, teams will likely refrain from signing him — especially in a season with a net salary cap shortfall of $25 million per team.

There’s another reason for a decision to be made quickly by the league. Sherman quite possibly would benefit greatly at this point from the structure and routine that comes from being on an NFL team, along with the resources available to players who need assistance of any kind. Although Sherman may decide that he should take some time before joining a team, the vague possibility of paid leave should not be an impediment to a potential decision to join a team.

9 responses to “NFL should promptly decide whether Richard Sherman will be subject to paid leave

  1. No one is going to sign him at the moment. The best thing everyone one can do is let the family work through this. They don’t need any input from the NFL right now.

  2. ” Sherman quite possibly would benefit greatly at this point from the structure and routine that comes from being on an NFL team, along with the resources available to players who need assistance of any kind”

    Perhaps, but it seems clear that potential benefit is outweighed by the fact he probably shouldn’t be taking anymore hits to the head.

  3. So just because he isn’t going to be charged with a felony we’re supposed to support him being on a team and getting paid? Those are hardly the important issues with this guy right now. He was intoxicated while driving, crashed IN A CONSTRUCTION ZONE, fled the scene of the accident, threatened to kill himself and harm others AND fight with the police. He had to be taken down by a police dog. To argue that he needs the support of the NFL and million dollar payday’s is ridiculous. The guy should be banned for life.

  4. No one will sign him until this is cleared up.
    He is not under contract to anyone. He should not be paid at all.

  5. They have some time to wait to make sure they have all the details. Even before this incident it was looking like he might start the season a free agent and have to wait for injuries to force some team to look for help. Nobody was in any hurry to sign him before this all happened and they’ll be even more hesitant now.

  6. 49ers: We’re going to support you!
    Sherman: Can I have a job then?
    49ers: Ahhhh, nope.

  7. It’s funny how we talk about paid leave as if it’s actually some sort of punishment.

  8. If they haven’t done so for Deshaun Watson, why would they do it for Sherman?

  9. Its becoming more and more clear why Sherman wasn’t signed over the past five months.

    But let’s say later today Goodell rules that Sherman will not be placed on the exempt list when signed. How exactly does this help Richard? The only difference from his status compared to last week (when no one wanted him) is the four misdemeanors he’s facing and his self-admitted mental health issues.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.