Pegula spokesman disputes report that Bills want $1.1 billion in public money for new stadium

USA TODAY Sports

On Sunday, the newspaper of record in Buffalo published a major story regarding the negotiations aimed at building a new stadium for the Bills. The report from Tom Precious claimed that ownership’s proposal asks for the project to be fully funded by taxpayer money.

Precious sought a response from Pegula Sports and Entertainment before the story went live. An official from the company declined to comment. After the story hit (and after the backlash against billionaire bailouts began), a spokesperson for Terry and Kim Pegula had something to say.

Here’s the text Precious added: “After publication of the story, a PSE spokesman, Jim Wilkinson, said the team is not seeking any funds for work at KeyBank Center [home of the Buffalo Sabres]. Wilkinson also said the figure of at least $1.1 billion being sought in public money for a new Bills’ stadium was incorrect; he declined to say if the request by the team was higher or lower.”

By declining to say whether the real number is higher, it’s possible that Wilkinson is saying that the Bills actually want $1.2 billion in public money, or more. Regardless, Wilkinson quibbled with the number, not with the notion that the Pegulas want taxpayers to pay the full price of the team’s new stadium.

The fact that PSE said nothing before the story was published suggests that they decided to ignore the report unless and until it created negative publicity. Based on social media (which hardly reflects reality but which drives plenty of PR strategies), the reaction was overwhelming harsh. It’s fair to wonder whether, in response, the Bills felt compelled to find something/anything to say in an effort to extinguish the brushfire.

Still, it’s unclear whether the contents of the bucket were water or jet fuel. It’s possible that they indeed have asked for 100 percent public funding, and that they seized on the technical inaccuracy of the reported number as a way to create the impression that the claim that they don’t want to pay for any of the new stadium was inaccurate, too.

The Bills, who own and operate a well-trafficked team website, can say whatever they want whenever they want however they want in response to yesterday’s reports. They can say that they haven’t requested full taxpayer funding, that they haven’t “made clear to government negotiators that there are other cities elsewhere that desire an NFL franchise and would pay handsomely for it,” and/or that Austin isn’t one of the cities to which they were referring.

Finally, Bills fans, don’t be upset that we’re writing these stories. Owners who want to use other cities first as leverage and then as a viable alternative location want these things to not be discussed and debated. They want to work quietly behind the scenes, making the local citizens (customers) think a full commitment remains in place until it’s time to disappear in the middle of the night, figuratively as in the case of the Rams leaving St. Louis — literally as in the case of the Colts leaving Baltimore.

15 responses to “Pegula spokesman disputes report that Bills want $1.1 billion in public money for new stadium

  1. Negotiations are also a contact sport.
    Western NY understands the game, and when the posturing is over and a deal is struck, fully expect a new dome stadium to be build in Orchard Park.

  2. Funny how all these billionaires rally against socialism unless it’s in the form of handouts for them.

  3. If they want the move threats to be taken seriously they need some more believable options. Toronto is never going to foot the full bill for a stadium so that idea is a non-starter. And Austin would never get approved by the owners because both the Cowboys and Texans are totally against a third team in Texas. (Plus Austin is short on both land and infrastructure for an NFL-sized stadium.)

  4. I wonder if the dismantling of the Buffalo Sabres is not a first step towards the Pegula’s exit from the Buffalo market. Or a warning of what could happen if their desire/demand for public money is not satisfied…

  5. NY state wastes so much money in their 212 Billion $ budget. Property tax is quadruple of my state. For what?

  6. There should be zero public funds given to freaking football teams during a pandemic. The Pegulas are gross.

  7. The Pegulas have spent so much effort in telling everyone how they’re in lockstep with the citizens of Buffalo and understand the area so well.
    It’s either completely careless & irresponsible, or part of some kind of calculated plan that they would let the Buffalo News run with a story that they had to know was going to start a fire.
    The Pegulas aren’t totally infallible. After all, they hired Rex Ryan, and still don’t appear to have a clue how to turn the Sabres around.

  8. It will always be Buffalo… they are not leaving this fanbase… it would be the most financially irresponsible thing they could do!

  9. a new dome stadium to be build in Orchard Park.

    _____

    I hate domed stadiums.

    I think the newest one is in Minnesota, that cost 1.1 billion in 2016. A similar place would cost a lot more today. It doesnt have a retractable roof, that would cost more.

    Ive been to about 25 games in Buffalo, some sun, some rain, some snow, some super windy – sometimes all four in the same game!

    I still think if they go inside, they lose some of the identity and character of the team. But its inevitable I guess.

  10. Pegula poured billions into the entertainment district outside the hockey arena. If he sells the Bills and is hated for it, but retains the Sabres, it will be interesting. If he sells both, what does he think is going to happen to the billions he poured into the entertainment district. Those buildings were supposed to support events at the arena–they are not money makers in and of themselves. This is beyond weird.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.