Dave Gettleman “happy” with how Odell Beckham trade worked out

Cleveland Browns Training Camp
Getty Images

The Giants will be in Cleveland for a pair of joint practices with the Browns that will mark their first chance to see wide receiver Odell Beckham in person since they traded him in 2019.

Beckham missed last year’s game between the teams with a torn ACL, so there wasn’t much focus on the reunion when the Browns came to town. General Manager Dave Gettleman and co-owner John Mara were both asked about it during Tuesday press conferences, however.

The Giants picked up safety Jabrill Peppers, defensive tackle Dexter Lawrence, and edge rusher Oshane Ximenes in deal, which Mara said he thinks “will work out well for both sides.” Gettleman has said you need a few years to assess a deal and proclaimed himself happy with this one.

“I’m happy,” Gettleman said. “We got Dexter. Ximines has had his injury issues, but when he’s been out there, he’s shown promise. Jabrill has done a hell of a job for us, so I like that group.”

The Giants haven’t made the playoffs since dealing Beckham while Beckham had a rough first season in Cleveland and missed last year’s playoff run, so neither team has gotten an overwhelming return on the deal. Both sides will hope a change in fortunes will follow this week’s practice sessions.

22 responses to “Dave Gettleman “happy” with how Odell Beckham trade worked out

  1. Trading away relevance for sub-mediocrity shouldn’t make any GM happy. But here we are.

  2. As a Browns fan, The Giants won that trade far and away. Weve paid Odell 50 mil so far for about 1,300 yards and a 7 TDs. The giants three players they got in that deal only make a COMBINED 37% of OBJs inflated salary. The guy hasnt been a top 3 WR in 6 years. Way to many browns fans want to just come up with excuses for the guy, nothing is ever his fault. He is always hurt and has an awful % on CATCHABLE balls, like 89th in the NFL. I’d take 25-30 other WRs before odell.

  3. NFL Priorities:
    QB
    Trenches (OL and DL)
    DBs
    Everything else

    I would not hesitate to trade away a WR for multiple picks at other positions.

  4. Agree with Browns fan – Ravens can’t draft receivers but we have had some success with vet WRs we have picked up – when Odell seemed available I was praying we didn’t go after him (and Browns probably wouldn’t trade him within division anyhow)- watching him vs Ravens he has not been a big factor so far.

  5. My honest, monday-morning-quarterback assessment is that both teams benefited from the deal, and also at least two players (OBJ & Peppers).

    Sometimes good workers and good workplaces don’t mesh and it’s better for both parties to “move on.”

  6. @ clevelandsportsandotherthingsthatmakememad I think what you’re saying is true, but an incomplete assessement.

    The Cleveland passing attack lacked a deep-threat, true No. 1 receiver prior to OBJ. Landry is excellent, but he’s a tactician: a handsy route-runner with excellent YAC, but he’s not a No. 1. He was drawing double teams our pass-attack was putrid.

    Introduce OBJ and yeah, his stats have been pedestrian (on paper) but the attention he garners has opened up opportunities for others. So his presence makes the team better even if he isn’t catching the ball.

    The biggest problem has been Mayfield’s demonstrated penchant for force-feeding OBJ. When that’s been the case…well its’ just been confusing because it hasn’t even appeared to work well for either player or for the offense overall.

  7. Since 2017 the giants are tied with the jets for worse record in NFL, how is Mara happy with this clown as GM

  8. I despise the Giants, but anyone who looks at that trade based upon actual production return to date and doesn’t think they won the trade so far is crazy.

    Beckham has cost a ton of money for a pound of production, and the offense has been much better when he isn’t on the field.

    Meanwhile, the Giants have gotten two productive players. You can’t judge a trade simply by which team has the better record since it happened. The contribution of the players in the trade does actually matter.

  9. And when the Giants still haven’t made the playoffs a decade from now while playing in the worst division in the NFL? Whatever makes you happy, I guess…

  10. Beckham has cost a ton of money for a pound of production, and the offense has been much better when he isn’t on the field.

    Meanwhile, the Giants have gotten two productive players. You can’t judge a trade simply by which team has the better record since it happened. The contribution of the players in the trade does actually matter.

    Sure, if competitive sports are *REALLY* about budgets and ledgers and payroll analysis and not about winning games, this is exactly true! Eye roll.

  11. This guy is delusional. Peppers is awful. He was awful with the Browns and he may be worse with the Giants

  12. Gettleman realizes all that matters is wins and losses right? Scoreboard always tells a winner and loser, except a tie, which how NFL allows ties is silly. This isnt soccer

  13. How does Gettleman still have a job? He is 15-33 as GM of the Giants. Yeah that trade worked out great for you Davey boy LOL.

  14. In theory, it’s not that the trade was bad for the Giants. Getting a first-rounder, a third-rounder and a first-round pick coming off his first season isn’t a bad haul for an overrated WR who can’t stay healthy. It’s that the players behind those picks were a run-stuffing D-lineman, a guy who’s too slow for safety but too small for LB and some guy I never heard of.

  15. Does anyone think that if Odell was still on the Giants, that they would have had a better record? Or that somehow a player who missed 25% of the games he was eligible to play for the Giants would suddenly be healthy?

    People are arguing 2 different things. Do the Giants have more talent on their roster through the subtraction of Odel? The answer is yes. The challenge for the Giants is, the talent level on a number of parts of their roster also needed upgrades. Until the offensive line becomes league average or better – their record won’t be good.

  16. I thought that the giants won the trade because they were able to lose the big WR contract, but now they sign Kenny Golladay to the same price. I think Kenny is a great WR, but I dont want to pay him $18 million. PFF rated their offensive line dead last in their pre-season rankings, they might have wanted to invest some of that money in the O-Line on people not named Nate.

  17. The Giants won that trade. The reason they don’t have a better record has a lot more to do with Daniel Jones and Saquon Barkley than that trade.

  18. mrdaz says:
    August 18, 2021 at 11:26 am
    In theory, it’s not that the trade was bad for the Giants. Getting a first-rounder, a third-rounder and a first-round pick coming off his first season isn’t a bad haul for an overrated WR who can’t stay healthy. It’s that the players behind those picks were a run-stuffing D-lineman, a guy who’s too slow for safety but too small for LB and some guy I never heard of.
    _________________

    Dex Lawrence is a good player. As long as teams still run the football, run stuffers are important. He’s not an edge rusher which is arguably a more impactful position, but I’d rather pick a solid run stopper at 17 than reach on a pass rusher and miss. Peppers is a hybrid safety. He is good enough in coverage to drop back and good enough at tackling to play in the box, even though he’s not exceptional at either. Having a defensive coordinator like Patrick Graham that knows how to use hybrid players is necessary when you have guys like Peppers and Logan Ryan.

  19. Odell who? Haven’t heard of him here in Cleveland. Didn’t he used to play football in NY about 5 years ago?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.