Leak of Jon Gruden email renews questions regarding lack of transparency in WFT investigation

Miami Dolphins v Las Vegas Raiders
Getty Images

The NFL managed to place into a nuclear sarcophagus any and all evidence regarding the chronic misbehavior that happened for years within the Washington organization. The NFL specifically didn’t request a written report, ensuring that nothing will surface — unless the league wants it to.

Earlier this week, someone wanted it to.

Andrew Beaton of the Wall Street Journal, who broke the story of the racially-charged Jon Gruden email to former Washington executive Bruce Allen, surely didn’t find it in a dumpster or by hacking the league’s computer systems. Someone wanted Beaton to have it. Someone wanted Beaton to report it. And no one has seen fit to leak any of the emails, other communications, or other potentially embarrassing or troubling evidence regarding, for example, the behavior of Washington owner Daniel Snyder.

Let that one settle in. Snyder’s organization created a toxic work environment, and the league has successfully shielded Snyder from having any of the facts or allegations found during the entire investigation come to light. Facts and allegations that resulted in an eight-figure fine for Snyder and a non-suspension suspension that ends when the Commissioner determines it should end, unless he doesn’t.

This isn’t a defense of Gruden. But he ended up taking shrapnel from the grenade that Snyder somehow avoided.

It’s unclear why the email came to light on Friday. Some in league circles speculate that the NFL wants Gruden to be fired by the Raiders. Others wonder whether the NFL was trying to help NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith secure enough votes to remain on the job, in lieu of having a new executive director who may feel compelled to show up and start potential trouble for the league.

Regardless, someone wanted this one and only one Gruden email to be released to the public. And no one has wanted any facts or allegations directly involving Snyder to be released.

It’s a double standard oozing with irony. Snyder’s mess may take down Gruden. At a minimum, he’s damaged goods. Snyder, in contrast, will write a check and keep on trucking.

36 responses to “Leak of Jon Gruden email renews questions regarding lack of transparency in WFT investigation

  1. Definitely done on purpose. The question is why? Was it to take heat off of Myer? Help Smith? Get Gruden fired? We will never fully know.

  2. How is Gruden damaged goods from an email 10 years ago when he wasn’t even in the NFL?

    Now if he does something like that while employed by the NFL and has a track record then you may have a case.

    You can’t punish someone for a private conversation 10 years ago when not employed by your organization / league.

  3. I did find it ironic that none of the emails from the perpetrators came to light, but some side stuff involving other people is what came out.

  4. The NFL’s Billionaire owners will be protected at all times. That’s what Goodell is being paid to do. The working-class employees are on their own.

  5. Why, I’m shocked, absolutely shocked to hear that an investigation overseen by Roger Goodell could possibly be corrupt.

  6. A member of the NFL front office is the likely culprit here, but it could just as easily be a rogue employee of the investigating law firm.

  7. Did Gruden and Bruce Allen (the email recipient) have any sort of falling out? If yes, then the dots may be easier to connect.

  8. Bruce Allen has nothing to do with the leak. The NFL wants Smith to remain as NFLPA president because he’s bad at his job. He’s in the owners pockets.

  9. Something like this happens on the same day as the NFLPA election? Maybe only hours before? Sure seems like a coincidence, and I don’t believe in coincidences.

  10. Didn’t a Gruden coach Washington? There’s the fallout with Snyder or someone in the organization with the Grudens.

  11. Wanna conspiracy?

    This is nothing more than Daniel Snyder having a grudge against the Grudens after Jay left on bad terms. Gruden likely sided with his brother behind the scenes and during telecasts.

    I’ll take it a step further. Gruden and Allen probably had some choice words about Snyder in the “other materials”.

  12. Suspicious that this came up at the same time Smith was up to have his contract renewed. If he wasn’t renewed at the same time a racist email came out…..

  13. I think the NFL is just responding for publicity so they don’t get scrutinized. Even Mark Davis is too. NFL owners have been taking advantage of minorities with the millions they make. Look at college football. All the money made and these kids can’t even by lunch. I look at grudens body of work and the raiders history, fans and more. Gruden feeds off of all that. He loves being that image which is a culture of fans and players of many backgrounds.

  14. Daniel Snyder cannot even come up with a new “nickname” for his team. What’s it been, two years, and his team is still just referred to as The Washington Football Team. Such a real creative genius this Snyder fella.

  15. wonderboy says:
    October 9, 2021 at 12:46 pm
    How is Gruden damaged goods from an email 10 years ago when he wasn’t even in the NFL?

    Now if he does something like that while employed by the NFL and has a track record then you may have a case.

    You can’t punish someone for a private conversation 10 years ago when not employed by your organization / league.
    ——–
    ESPN is “Corporate Partners” with the NFL so while he may not have worked directly for the NFL, he was certainly the face and voice of Monday Night Football, along with his QB camps and so on. And quite frankly, it doesn’t matter that he wasn’t directly employed by the NFL 10 years ago because he’s been employed by the NFL since 2018.

    The “motivation” for leaking the email is irrelevant. People that “don’t have a racist bone in their body” don’t go immediately to a racist trope when they’re angry with a Black person, which is exactly what Gruden did in this situation. His response was exacerbated by the insanely stupid notion of EMAILING it to the president of another football team! I mean, it’s bad enough that he said that in a private conversation but it’s just epic stupidity to leave a paper trail.

  16. Gruden is not damaged goods, and he’ll emerge from this more popular than ever, especially among black folks. Contrary to what many are hoping, not all folks are completely clueless. Most of us grew up in segregated neighborhoods and never had any interaction with black people. Gruden, being the son of a football coach, grew up around black and white people, and is genuine when it comes to being colorblind. People make fun of the way Gruden looks all the time, and I’ve never heard anyone being called out for racism. This is way beyond a double standard. It’s more about ignorance and being un-American. Here’s a challenge for everyone. Take out your phone and look through your phone numbers. How many are black people. Now go check Gruden’s phone. Crickets.

  17. Who cares what someone said 10 years ago, if words hurt that much you are a weak person.

  18. “And no one has seen fit to leak any of the emails, other communications, or other potentially embarrassing or troubling evidence regarding, for example, the behavior of Washington owner Daniel Snyder.”

    I would be interested in reading any such evidence, if such exists. But there is real uncertainty whether Snyder was ever present to witness the horrible and inexcusable treatment of women by high-level executives of his team. While Snyder is at least an incompetent absentee landlord and team owner, if not worse, there is no real uncertainty whether ever-present top executive Bruce Allen was present and providing approval (at least).

    A fairer statement would have been
    “And no one has seen fit to leak any of the emails, other communications, or other potentially embarrassing or troubling evidence regarding, for example, the behavior of Washington top executive Bruce Allen.”

  19. The NFL occasionally decides to be stunningly hypocritical and absolutely full of it. And it does it on any number of issues big and small. No rhyme or reason and often seems petty, petulant, and arrogant as it does it. IMO

  20. Get Goodell and his creepy, corrupt lawyers on that stand and we’ll see all kinds of corrupt “materials” during the discovery process.

    How Congress hasn’t gotten involved with this stuff after seeing them slap MLB for knowingly allowing roids, is anyone’s guess.

  21. Gruden used the term “rubber lips” to define a liar. Using Michelin Tires to describe lips means a big liar. That’s all. The only racism is the racism from reporters trying to make this about racism. But that s America today. Sad!!

  22. raiderrealist says:
    October 9, 2021 at 2:22 pm
    I think the NFL is just responding for publicity so they don’t get scrutinized. Even Mark Davis is too. NFL owners have been taking advantage of minorities with the millions they make. Look at college football. All the money made and these kids can’t even by lunch. I look at grudens body of work and the raiders history, fans and more. Gruden feeds off of all that. He loves being that image which is a culture of fans and players of many backgrounds
    ————————————————————————————————-
    Taking advantage of minorities… minorities are the majority of players. Tell me again how much Dak Prescott is getting paid? “These kids can’t even buy lunch.” Have you ever attended an institution of higher learning with a sports team? Where I work, the college basketball players have their own floor in the dorm. They have a kitchen, which is fully stocked with food, snacks and every type of beverage provided by the university. The football team is feed three meals a day. My point is not on whether they should get paid, but that student/athletes are not living off of ramen noodles.

  23. Well, if the league can suppress results of the football inflation tests (~2015) in various temperature conditions, why be surprised at suppressing anything else for most of a decade when memories of fans are so short anyway?

  24. BS, a ten year old accusation over a off color statement. This is a poisonous culture we live in today, ginned up by those who make a living and profits off racism. America is not a racist country. But the individuals who perpetuate racism and bigotry are in fact most guilty of that which they accuse others of.
    Gruden is not racist, his comment is not racist, and people don’t care. people who love NFL football don’t care about a 10 year old statement.
    Starting by forcing the Redskins to get rid of their name. , taking knee during the national anthem, giving the anti American marxist BLM a voice, playing the BLM national anthem, then forcing all players and administrative staff to sucrose to taking a (ineffective and unproven) covid shot if only to display adherence and submission to this poisonous culture. and now hyping up a ten year old petty Gruden comment…. good grief
    This is not going to go away or stop,this manifestation is only increasing and expanding. its like a bear, the more it eats, the hungrier it gets.
    this is all growing and expanding, the political correctness culture, the marxist BLM marxist culture isn’t going to stop here, its only going to get worse and worse, one event after another, weak after weak, new things will come up , making the sport less of a sport and more of a political culture.
    The NFL is under attack. These individuals despise the NFL and the freedom it once had from the political culture

  25. Hilarious that you’re calling Gruden damaged goods as you’re actively damaging the goods!

  26. Stvvon I was enjoying your crazy rant right up to the vax thing, then I realized you’re just a nut.

  27. Is this the only thing they found? I wonder if Goodell has ever said anything like that

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.