Release of Jeff Pash emails underscores importance of releasing all of them

NFL Contract Talks Continue As Deadline Approaches
Getty Images

It’s unclear who has access to the 650,000 emails from the WFT investigation that supposedly would be kept secret and safe. It is clear that one or more people have failed to kept these emails secret, or safe.

Joining Jon Gruden on the selective-leak hit list is Jeff Pash, the NFL’s general counsel who may or may not be facing jeopardy after his emails with former Washington president Bruce Allen were leaked and reported both by the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal on Thursday night.

Although Pash’s comments land nowhere near the poisonous ballpark in which multiple Gruden emails resided, Pash has been a lawyer for decades. He should be able to understand the very clear connection between reducing words to writing and having those writings show up later. At a minimum, his emails show a too-cozy relationship with Allen, the kind of relationship that could undermine the competitive integrity of the league.

Setting aside for now (but not for long) whether decisions about concealing the emails were aimed at protecting Pash, the problem remains that the documents are not fully concealed. They’ve become weaponized, and the weapon has been used twice in less than a week.

Someone wanted Gruden out. They got their wish. Someone wanted to at least discredit and at most destroy Pash. The former has happened; the latter still could.

Although releasing all of the emails would create consequences for any others who have sent problematic emails to Allen (or whose emails otherwise were included in the broader probe), it would obliterate the ability to selectively target people for embarrassment and/or unemployment.

Gruden got what he deserved, but he has been treated unfairly. Both can be true. And it likewise would be unfair for others to have to worry about whether they’ll eventually say or do something to land on someone’s enemies list to the point where their past emails will be used against them.

For example, what if former Washington assistant Sean McVay, who now coaches the Rams, says or does something to sufficiently piss off someone with access to those 650,000 emails? What if that person (or persons) then dips into the 650,000 emails to see if there’s anything that remotely could be used against McVay?

This doesn’t mean McVay has anything to worry about. However, anyone who sent or received emails on a WFT server in the decade or so preceding the investigation now has to worry about whether they have something to worry about.

It’s a great way, frankly, to keep a wide swath of people in line. Even if there’s nothing in the emails sent by any one person that would cause problems, anyone whose emails are in that 650,000-document stack has a reason to not tug on Superman’s cape. To not say or do anything that would motivate whoever has access to those emails to take a fresh look and to see if that person can be silenced in the same way that Gruden was.

That’s why EVERYTHING should be on the table. And that’s why media and fans should keep clamoring. Ultimately, it’s why someone in Congress should convene a hearing on this matter and demand that all of the emails be released.

Does Congress have better things to do? Yes. But Congress can do many things at once. The NFL has become a key part of our shared public life. Most of the teams rely on public money for their stadiums. The Washington Football Team had a sufficiently toxic work environment to justify a full-blown investigation. Now, the results of an investigation into serious wrongdoing is being used to (wait for it) potentially commit unrelated serious wrongdoing.

It needs to end, and the only way to do it is to release all of the documents.

32 responses to “Release of Jeff Pash emails underscores importance of releasing all of them

  1. Can’t wait until the Superbowl is rendered moot when someone else’s emails, related to whoever’s in the Superbowl at the time, come out.

  2. Uh, releasing all the emails would be a funny way of making it end for other people. A better way would be to investigate and find the leaker and punish them.

  3. I’m sure the attorneys in ST Louis vs NFL would love to see if there is anything they could use in their matter.

  4. “Congress should convene a hearing”

    What so one dysfunctional group can tell another dysfunctional group that they are acting inappropriately?

  5. b yaaah says:
    October 15, 2021 at 10:13 am
    I hate 2021 so much. Goodell wanted Gruden gone all the while protecting Snyder. Such a joke.

    ————-

    This isn’t about protecting Dan Snyder. There is enough dirt in there to bury every owner and executive in the league. Goodell is “protecting the shield”

  6. The NFL is quite literally getting away with publicly blackmailing people. I really hope for sake of the WFT victims that this forces them to release everything and give Snyder his day of reckoning.

  7. Football guys aren’t PC. Never have been and never will be. The entire invention of the sport was for aggressive young men to take that out somewhere. Why is the modern era trying to take the last sport away from us?

  8. Everyone suspects the league office or the legal firms performing NFL work becasue the leaks appeared in NYC newspapers. I suggest Dan Snyder.

    He has a history of under-handed tactics (see cheerleaders), wanted to get back at Bruce Allen, and likely hates the family Gruden. He knows the NFL is not releasing everything because ownership does not want that to happen.

  9. Thank goodness Belichick isn’t a babbly little gossip-girl like the rest of the coaches.

  10. “It’s a great way, frankly, to keep a wide swath of people in line.” That’s a pretty scary statement, Mike.

  11. byaaah says:
    October 15, 2021 at 10:40 am
    Football guys aren’t PC. Never have been and never will be.
    _________________________

    Wrong. There’s an aspect of life that’s taught in football, and everyone should practice it – it’s called discipline. There’s an even more important aspect of life that is taught in football, and everyone should practice it – it’s called respect. Professionals exercise discipline and respect on a daily basis, while not being “PC”. These aspects are not mutually exclusive.

    Respect is the first virtue that is a hardline I teach my kids. Every person in this country would benefit greatly if there was more of it practiced on a regular basis.

  12. When were these e-mails between Pash and Allen created? Remember that on, or before, March 2015, the NFL was tax exempt.

  13. minime says:
    October 15, 2021 at 10:52 am
    Can’t fire owners.

    ——–

    Tell that to the former owner of the Carolina Panthers, Jerry Richardson.

  14. An NFL executive covering up cheating by a team because he friendly with that team’s GM seems like a big deal.

  15. The NFL doesn’t seem to concerned about finding the source of the leak which leads me to believe the league itself leaked them.

  16. I guess I need to say that I am a little bit confused about this whole email thing. For example – how were the emails obtained? Did the WFT – have them all stored on their computers? Did they have access to the password from Allen – or did they have somebody hack into the email system or was it not password protected? I mean when I was working my emails to fellow employees was password protected and when I left I assumed that the only people who could read my emails were the people who received them – unless the Computer geeks could hack into my email folder and display them all. Now if they were all forwarded to the NFL offices – who got them and how many people had access to them. Or did somebody in the WFT organization who sent them copy these files somewhere else? Were they put on a thumb drive? Too many unanswered questions IMO.

  17. There is no expectation of privacy when it comes to email. It is equivalent to talking in the public square for all to hear. That is the legal standard. If you wish to keep a conversation private, it’s either by written correspondence or private, in-person conversation. Jeff Pash should know this.

  18. Disclosure, not a redskins fan. The NFL has the right (I think) to keep what they want confidential. The continued quest for emails may actually show that Bruce Allen, the recipient of the Gruden emails is the culprit responsible for the atmosphere at WFT and not Snyder. Allen apparently was comfortable getting these emails from Gruden and they are emails associated and presented with a lawsuit Snyder is currently undertaking. Although Gruden is in the cross hairs and gone, the real target may have been Allen all along.

  19. It seems these days that the NFL is going through stages to try and stay relevant…

    Its main attraction for so long was brutality… Hard hits, spectacular plays and toughness.
    So when they went SOFT they introduced Politics but that turned MANY away and so now they are introducing drama like a soap opera….

    JUST PLAY THE GAME!

  20. fixerupper says:

    October 15, 2021 at 11:47 am

    When were these e-mails between Pash and Allen created? Remember that on, or before, March 2015, the NFL was tax exempt
    —————
    Which changes nothing in this instance so theres no reason to remember that.

  21. @canadapackersfan – there arent “too many unanswered questions”. Everything you asked can be easily googled and find in other stories. Every story however isnt going to go back over everything in the case as that would be redundant.

  22. Anybody who has not read the New York Times article on the Pash/Allen emails shouldnt comment. Anybody who doesnt think that the NFL HQ is not full of corrupt individuals needs to give their head a shake. A whole lot of buddy buddy with rich billionaires and the top dogs at the NFL offices and top team officials is no well documented in these emails and it needs to be fully given the light of day and eventually fixed. Especially now that gambling is not only allowed but promoted.

  23. Canadapacker says:
    October 15, 2021 at 12:01 pm
    I guess I need to say that I am a little bit confused about this whole email thing. For example – how were the emails obtained? Did the WFT – have them all stored on their computers? Did they have access to the password from Allen – or did they have somebody hack into the email system or was it not password protected? I mean when I was working my emails to fellow employees was password protected and when I left I assumed that the only people who could read my emails were the people who received them – unless the Computer geeks could hack into my email folder and display them all. Now if they were all forwarded to the NFL offices – who got them and how many people had access to them. Or did somebody in the WFT organization who sent them copy these files somewhere else? Were they put on a thumb drive? Too many unanswered questions IMO.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Company email accounts are property of the company, not the employees.
    Those accounts are managed by IT departments.
    No hacking or nerds needed.

    This is first day stuff

  24. David says:
    October 15, 2021 at 12:13 pm

    There is no expectation of privacy when it comes to email. It is equivalent to talking in the public square for all to hear. That is the legal standard. If you wish to keep a conversation private, it’s either by written correspondence or private, in-person conversation. Jeff Pash should know this.

    **************************************

    You don’t know what you’re talking about David.
    While Yes, there should be “No expectation” of privacy in an email because of the fact that you can’t control where it does, is is by NO MEANS the “equivalent” legally of “talking in the public square.”

    The organization that manages the email system and employs you is the “owner” and “custodian” of the data and as such have a responsibility to house it, control it, and archive it according to company policy/standards.

    If someone has access to such data (whether an admin or through an audit” and can choose to disseminate what it wants for nefarious purposes, that person is in violation of accessing potentially private data and the “leaker” of the original emails could be/and should be in danger of legal action.

    It’s as simple as that. Not enough people are asking:
    1) Who had access to the emails
    2) Who released these emails and to whom?
    3) What was their reason
    4) Are they authorized to do so?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.