NFL: The 650,000 emails were sent to and from Bruce Allen on his WFT team account

Washington Redskins v Miami Dolphins
Getty Images

Many questions remain regarding the 650,000 emails from which a handful were leaked in recent days, ending the coaching career of Jon Gruden and creating at a minimum discomfort for NFL general counsel Jeff Pash. One of the questions now has an answer.

Where did the 650,000 emails come from? Per the NFL, they were sent to and from former Washington president Bruce Allen on his team account, and they also were “outside the scope of the workplace culture investigation.”

Allen worked for the team from December 17, 2009 through December 31, 2019. So that’s an average of 65,000 emails sent or received per year. Which works out to 178 sent or received per day.

The answer as to the nature and origin of the 650,000 emails raises another important question. How many other emails were sent to and from current and former WFT employees during the period covered by the investigation? The NFL, through the investigation conducted by attorney Beth Wilkinson, did not review any of those.

Finally (for now), the fact that the Bruce Allen emails fall “outside the scope of the workplace culture investigation” undercuts the NFL’s stated reason for keeping the 650,000 Bruce Allen emails secret. The league continues to hide behind the notion that everything must be kept confidential in deference to the current and former WFT employees who came forward and provided information as part of the workplace culture investigation. If the 650,000 Bruce Allen emails fell outside the scope of the workplace culture investigation, there’s no reason to hide them.

Putting it more accurately, there’s no legitimate reason. For now, the NFL is relying on an illegitimate reason for refusing to release all of the emails for inspection, scrutiny, and any/all consequences that would flow therefrom.

54 responses to “NFL: The 650,000 emails were sent to and from Bruce Allen on his WFT team account

  1. Whoever thought they could just take out Gruden and walk away with no questions asked has severely misread the situations.

    The league had an Axe to grind with Gruden and Davis and has an unforeseen reason to protect Snyder at all costs.

    Football fans don’t want to hear about internal politics permeating through the sport and will want answers sooner than later.

  2. Wow. That is A LOT of emails to and from just one person, and still most likely only scratching the surface. It’s sad to think of how many people behind the shield think the way that Gruden does. They all need to be exposed as well.

  3. This explanation makes absolutely no sense. Why would the NFL/Wilkinson review only Allen’s emails to the exclusion of anyone else in the WFT organization, especially Snyder? Something is missing here.

  4. ryates67 says:
    October 19, 2021 at 12:50 pm
    There is too a legitimate reason not to release the emails: They are none of your business.
    ____________

    Rooting out discrimination should be everyone’s business. Exposing racists and misogynists is one way to stop such vile activities.

  5. This is a blatant hit job against the Raiders. Gruden and Davis should be filing law suites against the NFL. Goodell is a moron.

  6. That is not a lot of emails for one executive. In fact, that is fairly typical for a CEO-type, because they get cc’ed on everything. Considering that the entire organization was investigated for sexual harassment, it must mean that millions of emails were reviewed. This is why the law firm involved must have hired outside help and why we really don’t know who could have access to these emails no matter what the NFL and the lawyers claim.

  7. What a boomer move to use company equipment and accounts to send junk of all kinds. Start a group text on your personal phone dummy

  8. The NFL office has zero to gain by releasing the emails as they would potentially only cause more fires. So ask yourself, who does it help releasing the emails?

  9. Not sure how more people aren’t calling BS on this. What was the context of the WFT investigation? Workplace misconduct? So we’re really supposed to believe that 650,000 emails are somehow exempt ?!?!?!?!? More importantly how is discrimination exempt from a workplace misconduct investigation ?!?!?!?!?!

  10. purplengold says:
    October 19, 2021 at 1:14 pm
    Sounds like emailing would take up all of his productive time.

    3 0 Rate This

    —————————————-

    which explains the WFT record during his tenure….

  11. The NFL says the Bruce Allen emails are out of scope of the WFT investigation yet will not release them ” in deference to the current and former WFT employees who came forward and provided information as part of the workplace culture investigation.”

    The NFL claimed the Ted Wells investigation into deflategate was “independent” yet would not allow Pash to testify in the appeal hearing due to lawyer/client privilege.

    Whenever you butter your bread on both sides, it always gets messy. As a Pats fan, the parallels between the WFT and deflategate investigations are uncanny.

  12. Don’t forget, Snyder had to get permission to exceed the NFL debt limit in order to buy out his partners. Do you think he got a competitive rate? He’s mad because his costs just went up. Who does he blame? Bruce Allen.

  13. 178 emails everyday for a decade? Come on now. I’ll bet that one email sent to 10 recipients is being counted as 10 emails

  14. johnnydlive says:
    October 19, 2021 at 1:14 pm
    That is not a lot of emails for one executive. In fact, that is fairly typical for a CEO-type, because they get cc’ed on everything.
    __________

    Respectfully disagree. The last thing that good top executives want is to be cc’ed on everything. Their time is too valuable to be inundated with every mundane email.

  15. ryates67 says:
    October 19, 2021 at 12:50 pm
    There is too a legitimate reason not to release the emails: They are none of your business.

    39 61 Rate This
    ——————————————-

    When a company receives tax payer money to build privately owned stadiums, I say that they 100% ARE our business. Pay for it out of your own pocket and then you can say the business is confidential.

  16. The NFL is going to act surprised by the outcry when they quietly hire Bruce Allen for a role in league headquarters 6 months from now.

  17. In addition to his Golden Parachute from the Raiders, I hope Coach Gruden receives a nice,fat settlement check from the NFL.

  18. It’s becoming increasingly obvious they won’t release anything and could care less how much this stains their reputation. It’s laughable.

  19. Respectfully disagree. The last thing that good top executives want is to be cc’ed on everything. Their time is too valuable to be inundated with every mundane email.

    ————

    Getting them and reading them are it the same thing

  20. The none of our business argument only works when no emails have been released; however, selective emails out of that 650,000 were released to the public — can’t have it both ways. Dumbest point I’ve read yet today.

  21. taug107 says:
    October 19, 2021 at 2:41 pm
    Let’s release EVERYONE’S emails,social media posts and comments just to be fair.
    ______

    Everyone’s email are not involved in this situation.

    Social media posts and comments are by definition in the public domain. It is impossible to release something that has already been publicly published.

  22. If these 650K emails fell outside the scope of the WFT investigation, what was the purpose of their retention by the NFL? The more the NFL tries to explain away, using “it wasn’t us,” excuse, deeper the hole the NFL finds itself in. The next excuse is going to be a whopper.

  23. People should learn quickly, employer email system isn’t yours. It belongs to the employer.
    Idiots

  24. “178 sent or received per day”.

    No wonder why Bruce Allen sucked at his job so much. He was just emailing nonsense all day long.

  25. 178 emails per day, that’s 8 or 9 emails per minute for 24 hours. Does that sound reasonable?

  26. I bought one hat one time from Fanatics and I’ve gotten at least that many emails from them since.

  27. And the leagues wants us all to believe that all 650k we’re just between he and Gruden….

  28. covid19 says:
    October 19, 2021 at 3:48 pm
    178 emails per day, that’s 8 or 9 emails per minute for 24 hours. Does that sound reasonable?

    ____________________

    Where did you go to school? Your math is way off.

  29. So once again this sounds like the WFT is putting 100% of the blame of everything they were investigated about on one former employee. Right. Got it.

  30. whatinsamhill says:
    October 19, 2021 at 5:02 pm
    covid19 says:
    October 19, 2021 at 3:48 pm
    178 emails per day, that’s 8 or 9 emails per minute for 24 hours. Does that sound reasonable?
    —————————-

    Actually 178 emails a day divided by an 8 hour work day is around 22 emails an hour. Extend out to 12 hour work day you’ve got about 14 emails per hour. Figure these execs probably email all hours of the day call it a 16 hour day and you’ve got 11 emails an hour. Nothing out of the ordinary however many hours you look at it.

  31. whatinsamhill

    Actually 178 emails a day divided by an 8 hour work day is around 22 emails an hour. Extend out to 12 hour work day you’ve got about 14 emails per hour. Figure these execs probably email all hours of the day call it a 16 hour day and you’ve got 11 emails an hour. Nothing out of the ordinary however many hours you look at it.

  32. iwantrudytodressforme says:
    October 19, 2021 at 5:36 pm
    whatinsamhill

    Actually 178 emails a day divided by an 8 hour work day is around 22 emails an hour. Extend out to 12 hour work day you’ve got about 14 emails per hour. Figure these execs probably email all hours of the day call it a 16 hour day and you’ve got 11 emails an hour. Nothing out of the ordinary however many hours you look at it.
    ________________________________________________

    Agree totally with you.
    Just didn’t buy:

    covid19 says:
    October 19, 2021 at 3:48 pm
    178 emails per day, that’s 8 or 9 emails per minute for 24 hours. Does that sound reasonable?

  33. “If the 650,000 Bruce Allen emails fell outside the scope of the workplace culture investigation, there’s no reason to hide them.”

    Are you kidding me? You are asking to release private communications, that lawyers deemed not relevant to the investigation, so you can decide yourself if they are relevant or not? That’s just wrong. If you believe emails should be publicly available information then please give us all your username and password to your email account.

  34. Also I would like to know in this day and age why any business entity, even a NFL team, doesn’t have a records retention policy that destroys email after a certain age. We are talking about communications from almost a decade ago. My business automatically permanently destroys any emails that are over 18 months old and that’s pretty standard.

  35. I love how many posters seem to care not about Gruden being the scapegoat here and are defending the NFL not releasing the rest of the emails.
    This is about as close to organized crime as it gets.
    So the NFL is investigating the WFT for workplace misconduct and all that comes out of their investigation is that John Gruden is a bad man? Man, if you believe this load of bull, you are really clueless.
    I have an idea for the new team name….the Washington Mafia. This stinks to high heaven and is beyond a fair and balanced end to their so called investigation.

  36. patsbrat says:
    October 19, 2021 at 1:30 pm
    The NFL says the Bruce Allen emails are out of scope of the WFT investigation yet will not release them ” in deference to the current and former WFT employees who came forward and provided information as part of the workplace culture investigation.”

    The NFL claimed the Ted Wells investigation into deflategate was “independent” yet would not allow Pash to testify in the appeal hearing due to lawyer/client privilege.

    Whenever you butter your bread on both sides, it always gets messy. As a Pats fan, the parallels between the WFT and deflategate investigations are uncanny.

    ——

    Ted Wells admitted that Pash “wordsmithed” Ted’s supposedly independent report.

    And don’t forget that Pash had been the lead negotiator for the league during the 2011 lockout until a few owners, led by Bob Kraft and Clark Hunt, broke the impasse with the union.

    One can’t help but think, especially after seeing the recent emails released, that Pash was miffed at Kraft and Hunt because he didn’t get to stick it to the players and

  37. Not sure I want to read 650ks worth of “Hey, you good for lunch?” or “What time is your son’s birthday party?”. People use email, even company, for mundane messaging. Companies don’t care. I’m no exec, but my agency email averages 27 a day. Documents require electronic signature, PPI transmissions, memos, questions that need answering or invites to whatever. I’m just a supervisor, I couldn’t imagine how many he sent and received as a exec, daily. Unless you get a court order for legal reasons, there’s no reason that the team needs to release any of its communications to the general public.

  38. I’m sure there were staff members handling and sorting through that many e mails. Probably just giving him the relevant ones (like from Gruden).

  39. It does all seem like a bit of a witch hunt, but they couldn’t have found a more deserving witch.

  40. What about Dan Snyder’s emails ?

    Oh I forgot, for some reason he is off limits. Why even fake the investigation ?

  41. gibson45 says:
    October 19, 2021 at 1:06 pm
    This explanation makes absolutely no sense. Why would the NFL/Wilkinson review only Allen’s emails to the exclusion of anyone else in the WFT organization, especially Snyder? Something is missing here.
    ——————————————
    Exactly! They ONLY reviewed Allen’s emails, but his…one of the top people…were outside the scope of the investigation, and no one else’s emails were reviewed?!?!? Huh?

    If that’s true (and I’m sure it isn’t because that’s just incredibly stupid) then this was the kind of investigation that makes sure it doesn’t find anything.

    “Hey, did you call in our order to the pizza place?”
    “No. I found their number on the internet but it was irrelevant to my investigation.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.