Edwards-Helaire taunting call was the right application of a bad rule

USA TODAY Sports

The response has become damn near Pavlovian.

It goes like this. An NFL player draws a foul for taunting, and then Twitter explodes with shouts of “NO FUN LEAGUE!”

Setting aside for now the question of why witnessing taunting makes football more “fun” for anyone, resisting the rule at this point is futile. The league has created it. The league has made enforcing it a point of emphasis. Multiple coaches have defended it, loudly. So when, for example, a player like Chiefs running back Clyde Edwards-Helaire points directly at an opposing player on his way to the end zone, yes, a flag will be thrown.

It’s simple at this point. You may hate the rule (I definitely hate the high “thou shalt not posture to the entire sideline” bar that was created to justify Tony Corrente’s Gran Torino moment against Cassius Marsh from two weeks ago), but it’s the rule. Like every other rule. No holding. No pass interference. No jumping across the line of scrimmage before the snap. And no taunting.

The real question is whether the rule will be applied consistently and fairly. The Week 10 games included a couple of incidents of taunting that weren’t flagged; per a league source, Bills right tackle Spencer Brown wasn’t fined for posturing aggressively toward the Jets sideline, and Patriots running back Rhamdondre Stevenson wasn’t fined for getting in the face of a Browns defender after a touchdown.

That’s the challenge moving forward. Flagging it whenever it happens. Punishing it consistently or not at all. At this point, it’s not unreasonable to expect it to not happen. The league has decided that, for whatever reason, it doesn’t want these behaviors.

Meanwhile, be glad that the league has yet to embrace the college rule that, if applied to Edwards-Helaire, would have taken his touchdown off the board because the taunting happened before he entered the end zone. As the powers-that-be hear more and more criticism about the current taunting rule, there’s a chance they’ll become sufficiently tone deaf to expand the rule to potentially erase the outcome of a given play.

6 responses to “Edwards-Helaire taunting call was the right application of a bad rule

  1. Bad rule which should be no rule. Celebrations in the end zone are just as taunting to the opposing team as a finger being pointed. Tumbling into the endzone while unchallenged is taunting at its most fundamental level. Intentionally trying to get another team to jump offsides is equally unprofessional and taunting. Where do we stop with this silly rule if we aren’t going to enforce obvious and disgusting unprofessional behavior?

  2. Why did the ref announce that the taunting occurred after the TD when he started pointing before he was in the endzone? If they’re trying to accurately apply their bad rules, shouldn’t it have wiped out the TD since it occurred before the TD?

  3. Reminds me of covid, the rules they create make no sense. So there’s more questions than answers and no one agrees with anything since it’s so subjective.

  4. Just another Dumb NFL rule. They keep and enforce idiotic rules and get rid of Good rules that they didn’t enforce, like the Pass Interference Review. As far as the CEH taunting call, it was stupid. CEH pointed at a guy. Big Whoop.

  5. CEH pointing at a Dallas player = Instant Flag.

    Dallas player facemask / ripping Chiefs players’ helmet off = No Flag.

    Makes Sense…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.