NFL secures another victory in Oakland relocation litigation

Getty Images

For all the body blows the NFL took during the St. Louis relocation litigation, the NFL keeps delivering uppercuts in Oakland.

Via Daniel Kaplan of TheAthletic.com, the NFL secured another victory in the two-track legal process arising from the latest decision by the Raiders to leave Oakland.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of the federal antitrust lawsuit filed in connection with the move of the team from Oakland to Las Vegas. The next step, if the plaintiffs take it, will be to file a petition with the United States Supreme Court, which takes a small percentage of the cases submitted to it every year.

Also pending is a state-court lawsuit based on a breach of contract claim similar to the contention made by St. Louis that the NFL violated its relocation guidelines. The California court rejected the argument; the ruling has been appealed. As Kaplan describes it, the decision from the California Superior Court “reads as if it came from NFL talking points.”

It remains to be seen whether appeals in the California state court system will make a difference.

On one hand, the struggles in Oakland suggest that St. Louis was wise to take what it could while it could. On the other hand, the success that St. Louis enjoyed supports the notion that it shouldn’t have settled the case, instead forcing the NFL to take its reckoning.

5 responses to “NFL secures another victory in Oakland relocation litigation

  1. Whatever damages go against the NFL will ultimately be paid for by the fans. I’m always on the side of the league. I don’t want it to get to pay-per-view for NFL football. The City of Oakland screwed up and pushed the Raiders out of town. That’s a whole lot of revenue for a whole lot of businesses. They played hardball, and lost.

  2. “…….the success that St. Louis enjoyed supports the notion that it shouldn’t have settled the case, instead forcing the NFL to take its reckoning.”

    Was hoping that St. Louis would dig in & take Kroenke & The Shield to court. If there was in fact a signed agreement between the Lambs & the city over a new stadium, Kroenke deserves every single bit of liability that St. Louis could drop on him like Monty Python’s 16-ton weight.

  3. I agree that Oakland has no right to any retribution. They had plenty of chances to help build a stadium in Oakland and they outright refused. Unfortunately for the great fans there, to hell with the City of Oakland representatives.

    NFL football is already pay-per-view. How do you get out of town games that are not featured by the networks? Thankfully, DireTV is bowing out after this season. Time will tell if anything else that takes its place will be even more greedy.

  4. “How do you get out of town games that are not featured by the networks?”

    You buy a house on a hill, in between TV markets, and you put up several TV antennas. Doesn’t work every week, but sometimes I get 5 or 6 games during the two Sunday afternoon slots.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.