Was Antonio Brown’s penalty too light?

Miami Dolphins v Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Getty Images

Three days ago, the NFL handed out three-game suspensions to the three Buccaneers players who were found to have misrepresented their vaccination status. Some think that the players, and specifically receiver Antjonio Brown, should have gotten a more serious punishment.

Earlier today, Jason La Canfora of CBS Sports said that the Brown suspension “angered many rival coaches and executives.” They thought it was too lenient.

In one way, it definitely was. To the extent that the issue fell under the Personal Conduct Policy (the COVID protocol is silent on the issue), Brown becomes a repeat offender. Last year, he received an eight-game suspension after multiple off-field issues. So why wouldn’t he get more than the other players, neither of whom have prior conduct policy punishments?

We’ve posed this question to the league, which did not respond to three separate inquiries, which were sent on Friday, on Saturday, and earlier today.

7 responses to “Was Antonio Brown’s penalty too light?

  1. I like the headline, I think if Brown was lighter he would’ve gotten a one game suspension.

  2. 3 game suspension and no loss of job or legal prosecution for commuting a federal crime for falsifying a governmental agencies logo. This just set an example for all other Americans that they shouldn’t worry about real consequences of breaking this law… how could they possibly prosecute an average Joe and let these millionaires do it without consequences?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.