Manningcast accounts for only 6.1 percent of ESPN’s Cardinals-Rams audience

NFL: NOV 16 Vikings at Bears
Getty Images

The Manningcast has drawn rave reviews and social-media buzz. The eyeballs have not yet followed.

ESPN2’s Peyton and Eli show had a surprisingly small audience for its season finale on Monday night, during the wild-card playoff game between the Cardinals and Rams. Only 1.419 million viewers dialed up the alternative broadcast, one of the lowest total audience numbers during the first season of the alternate telecast.

With more than 23.1 million total viewers taking in the high-stakes postseason contest on ESPN, ABC, and ESPN2, the Manningcast accounted for a paltry 6.1 percent of the total audience.

As previously mentioned, at some point the bean counters at Disney need to ask whether the financial investment is justified by the performance. Unless the Manningcast is actually resulting in more people watching the games, the alternate telecast creates presumably significant expenses (the Mannings surely don’t do anything for peanuts, nor should they) and limited additional revenue.

They’re under contract for two more years. Amazon reportedly would like to pilfer Peyton and Eli for Thursday Night Football. At some point, ESPN quite possibly will say, “Feel free.”

17 responses to “Manningcast accounts for only 6.1 percent of ESPN’s Cardinals-Rams audience

  1. I always found the telecast too distracting, like having a couple of friends over to watch the game, and they talk right thru the game.

  2. Don’t show their big heads all game taking away from the game itself. They aren’t all that good. I enjoy them more than the MNF crew but that isn’t saying much. Most of the time their interviews are stiff and you don’t get a great breakdown of the game.

  3. They are fun to watch and to listen to , but it’s like the game is not being followed at all and I have given up and gone to the regular broadcast.

  4. The playoffs do not need additional humor cast. You have everything you need
    on the regular broadcast without being distracted by them interviewing Dwayne Johnson. Now regular season, that’s a different story.

  5. The novelty wore off quickly. For me it was five minutes into the first week then catching the highlights, lowlights and funny stuff on social media.

  6. Should be a after the game show. When I want to watch a football game I want to here about it, not anything else.

  7. I have never watched it, but from what I have seen from highlights and clips, it looks like you see them and the game, is that right? Cant you just put the game on the full screen with their audio (like any other announcer on a sporting event)? Why do we have to see them?

  8. The more important the game, the less a viewer wants to have guys yammering about everything except what’s on the field and to have their view of the field made smaller just so you can see the Mannings’ giant heads.

  9. I think their show is fine for a regular season Monday Night Football game. Jags vs. Texans?
    Sure, bring on the Manning distraction. But at playoff time, I don’t want to watch their shtick. It’s too scattered and forced to pair with a good game. It’s also disturbing to see Peyton’s giant forehead on an 85″ hi-def tv for over three hours at a time.

  10. mmmblumpkinpie says:
    January 20, 2022 at 11:05 am
    I think their show is fine for a regular season Monday Night Football game. Jags vs. Texans?
    Sure, bring on the Manning distraction. But at playoff time, I don’t want to watch their shtick. It’s too scattered and forced to pair with a good game. It’s also disturbing to see Peyton’s giant forehead on an 85″ hi-def tv for over three hours at a time.

    ======================================================================

    This.

    (hilarious screen name, btw!)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.