Tom Telesco: I support Brandon Staley 100 percent, we’re both big believers in using data

Los Angeles Chargers v Las Vegas Raiders
Getty Images

Chargers coach Brandon Staley gained a reputation as perhaps the most analytics-driven coach in the NFL during the 2021 season, and when the Chargers fell short of the playoffs, Staley’s approach drew plenty of criticism. But Chargers General Manager Tom Telesco is completely on board with Staley’s approach.

“I support him 100 percent,” Telesco said of Staley. “I’m a big believer in using data to make decisions, as is he. It doesn’t mean that there isn’t context involved in that — I mean, we’re not robots — but we’re trying to put our players in a position of strength, in a position of advantage, as much as we can. I love the identity that we play with. I know, on the outside, that not everyone may agree with how we play, but it’s who we are and I love it. That’s what we are and that’s the way that we’re going to play moving forward. You know what you get with us; we’re going to play aggressive — it’s not reckless, I really don’t see it as reckless. All of these decisions, even though they’re made in real-time, there’s research involved in it prior to the game. There’s also context involved in that, too. Like I said, Brandon is not a robot, but with decisions on the field, you have to make quick, quick decisions in real-time. I thought that he did a really excellent job with that this year. He has my support behind that.”

Telesco also said Staley is building his relationships with his players in a way that should bear fruit for years to come.

“He handled things very well this year,” Telesco said. “It’s great working with them. We have a great working relationship. I think you guys can tell, too, he really has a great connection with our team and with our players. I think you saw that on a daily basis. He has definitely brought an identity to this football team, which is step number one as you come in as a new head coach. I think that the future’s bright with where we are.”

Telesco has now completed nine seasons as the Chargers’ GM, and Staley is the third head coach during that time. Telesco says he’s not thinking about his job security, but he needs Staley to succeed, as if the Chargers need to make big changes, Telesco likely wouldn’t get the chance to stick around to work with a fourth head coach.

46 responses to “Tom Telesco: I support Brandon Staley 100 percent, we’re both big believers in using data

  1. I think that Staley has a chance to be an excellent HC.
    To do that he has to understand that analytics is one tool among many to make decisions.
    To succeed he will have to get more feel for the game, when he trusts his team more than just going by percentages.

    His players will need to know that he believes in them, and not just what the numbers say

  2. The data shows that GM’s and especially coaches for teams with very good QB’s who miss the playoffs are at high risk for getting fired.

  3. 69-76 record along with 0-2 in the playoffs in 9 seasons.
    Whatever you’re doing clearly isn’t working.

  4. Data is useful but has to be used in context. 4th down on your own 20, that is context.

    Also, calling a TO to take a run stuffing LB out and put in a DB on the last play of the game? That was the height of idiocy and most likely what caused them the playoffs.

  5. Regardless of the data, the coach singlehandedly cost the players a playoff spot with that time out. I’m sure the players know it.

  6. Data says those decisions reason why you missed playoffs.
    Or are you really just the new wave of data deniers?

  7. Data is important to consider. But when data drives the operation, well, the Chargers saw the results. A talented team that continues to underachieve. I wonder what the data says about that.

  8. First year coach, one game away from the playoffs?
    .
    i don’t see the issue. its not like the chargers took two steps back from the year before.
    .

  9. What data are they using to formulate their decisions? Data from many forth down plays are from a small sample. Often times forth down plays occur during garbage time when a defense is guarding against a big play or the sidelines.

  10. Sink or swim with him. Sounds a bit like a politician, when stuff doesn’t work or mistakes are made, just double down on your failed decisions (gamblers and stock traders do the same thing).

  11. For as long as I can remember, the teams with the best players won. Among the best teams, those with the best QB’s won even more. Everyone has all the data and analytics information, so that evens out. I don’t like to second guess coaching decisions, regardless of how they’re made. The Monday morning QB has never been wrong. But the Monday morning QB has never thrown a pass. The Chargers look like a contender. They’re one of the teams I’m least worried about. They also appear to have found an elite QB. The AFC has Mahomes, Allen, Burrow, and Herbert. Those teams will be battling for titles the next few years.

  12. As a Chiefs fan I support Coach Staley’s approach too. Nothing like having possibly an MVP level franchise like quarterback and then surrounding him with a coach and GM that run the operation with hubris and arrogance about past failed coaching decisions.

  13. Really excellent job??? Whose fault is it when you’re the only team in the NFL with a good quarterback (and good enough roster) to miss the playoffs? The Pete Buttigieg look alike single handedly gave away the Raiders and Chiefs games on national television with bizarre coaching tactics. A mannequin could have made the playoffs with the Chargers in 2021.

  14. If you consistently make the decisions with the highest probabilities of success, over time that’s going to show up in the win column even if it doesn’t always work.

    I like that he’s not coaching scared and playing to win, and I think he’s eventually going to have some rings to show for it.

  15. Staley seems to be growing into the HC position …hopefully he learns from his coaching miscues and gets the Chargers in the playoffs next year. Herbert and team are great to watch. Don’t want to see them wasted.

  16. A running game clock that is rapidly approaching zero is possibly the most important variable that was overlooked. The second variance is the opposing team’s willingness to risk making a mistake while that clock is running. It’s called risk assessment.

  17. “I’m a big believer in using data to make decisions, as is he..”, “You know what you get with us; we’re going to play aggressive “ — if it is data driven, then you cannot characterize it as “aggressive”. Aggressive means taking on extra risk whereas “data driven” is neither risky or safe, it’s neither aggressive or non-aggressive. It’s data driven which is supposedly getting you the right answer most of the time which is neither risky or aggressive, but simply right. These people do not even know what they are talking about.

  18. Look, 95% of his decisions made sense even when people disagreed, including all those 4th downs against the Chiefs. Analytics improve your chances of victory, but you can still lose. That doesn’t mean you made the wrong decision. However, that 4th down on his own 18 against the Raiders was just stupid. You have to understand the situation, momentum, confidence, and the human dynamic. Those things immediately impact the likelihood of victory as well, and failing inside your own 20 impacts all of those human elements.

  19. Hello?! Fans want a winner, not a coach and GM who think that data and analytics are going to eventually be the key to success. It’s obviously not working after 9 years. The Chargers have one of the best young quarterbacks in the NFL and so far, they are wasting him.

  20. People act like the NFL wasn’t aware of “analytics” until 10 years ago. Teams have always used statistics and looked at numbers. The only difference is that now some people put way too much emphasis on those numbers and like to act like they’re smarter than everyone else.

    My biggest gripe about this past season is that too many coaches left points on the field by going for it on 4th down instead of kicking a FG. When analytics are telling you to give up points and then those points would’ve been very helpful at the end of the game then your strategy isn’t benefitting your team.

  21. The analytics tell me you will be fired after next season after you fail to make the playoffs by using analytics.

    Football is about blocking, tackling, throwing, catching, kicking, punting, field position, physical toughness and mental toughness.

    Mathematics don’t do any of these things.

  22. If Tom Telesco thinks calling a time out with the clock running and the Raiders taking their sweet time trying to run out the clock (as a made field goal only changes their next destination, and a blocked kick and a run back kills their season) is “using data” and following the anaylitics he should be fired too, but this is the Charger organization, he should get a promotion. If a coach can’t see and recognize what’s happening on the field at any momemt, they are blind.

  23. Brandon Staley was surprisingly horrible in his first year. His decisions kept the Chargers out of the playoffs.

  24. Great. More commenters posting about “analytics” that they clearly don’t understand.

    And for the record, “gut feeling” is another word for analytics in that it’s completely based on what you’ve personally seen in the past. Think of it this way – someone who’s never watched a football game doesn’t have a “gut feeling” on whether a play is going to be a run or pass.

  25. Coaching over reliance on data lends increasing predictability as time goes on. Strategies are more effectively and proactively prepared for by opponents, trends and tendencies are there for all to see. The analytics will eventually say Brandon Staley will coach a certain way in certain situations with little risk of unpredictability because he leans on the numbers first. Preparing for variability is reduced. That being said, same old Chargers finding a way to blow it.

  26. So Telesco is “completely on board” with Staley’s approach. Good to know. Dean Spanos has filed this away to use next year when they miss the playoffs again and fires you both. Analyze that!.

  27. It would be great to see Justin Herbert and the Chargers in the playoffs, but if this is the way it’s going to be, they will be watching from their couches every season. When will ownership tire of them always being not quite good enough to make it?

  28. hazydavey says:
    January 21, 2022 at 9:12 am
    Look, 95% of his decisions made sense even when people disagreed, including all those 4th downs against the Chiefs. Analytics improve your chances of victory, but you can still lose. That doesn’t mean you made the wrong decision.

    ———————-
    Why isn’t the same latitude given to coaches who make non-analytics decisions? How come when a coach makes a decision based on his knowledge or instance of the game, and it turns out wrong, everybody wants him fired, and no one says it can still be the right decision even if you lose. The analytics people are the ones that pounce on every wrong decision that non-analytics people make as proof that analytics works, but then hides behind the concept of it can still be the right decision even if you lose when an analytics decision turns out to be wrong or happen to cross the team the game.

  29. “First year coach, one game away from the playoffs?
    .
    i don’t see the issue. its not like the chargers took two steps back from the year before.”
    _______________

    They changed the entire coaching staff because the last guy managed the clock poorly and made bad play calls only to have the new guy do the exact same thing. Monumental waste of effort to end up in the exact same place. And for as good as Herbert is would he have been even better this season with some continuity carrying over from his rookie year?

  30. As long as Staley is dogmatically obedient to analytics, he will make occasional decisions that stick out as going against the grain of common sense. If he has supreme talent to work with, and they’re playing the dregs of the league, it won’t matter. But in tight games, it will. And these analytics guys cling to their data in tight games. That’s the whole reason they embrace analytics to begin with. It takes the burden off their shoulders.

    I’ve been teaching since the mid-90s. Trust me. When people in Staley’s generation came through my classes, they were obsessed with their grades, the measurables. And they were beyond suspicious of anything that wasn’t measurable and data-driven. In fact, they were scared to death of it. Guess what else? While they were good students, they didn’t learn nearly as much as they could. They were close minded, rigid, and not flexible….just like Staley has seemed in press conferences after close losses.

    He’s smart. He’ll grow up. But until he does, there will be more painful moments like that Chiefs game…

  31. “It doesn’t mean that there isn’t context involved in that — I mean, we’re not robots”

    Unfortunately, your coach is a robot who relied only on math without context to lose you the game that could put the team in the playoff!

  32. I’m a computer nerd by trade; change is constant. I think football requires a balance of innovation, execution, change & feel for the situation at hand: momentum, ebb/flow of the game, strategy, etc. If you’re a robot to analytics w/ football, you can (potentially) lose sight of the big picture & forget analytics is only 1 tool. Case in point: you go for it on 4th down (3x, vs KC on 16dec2021) & flush 9 easy points that probably net you a win.

    What’s that faint muffling sound you hear?

    Oh, that’s Herb Edwards whispering: “You play to win the game!”

  33. If he decides to stop supporting him, he’s 100 percent welcome back as the DC for the real LA team.

  34. “it’s who we are and I love it. That’s what we are and that’s the way that we’re going to play moving forward.”

    What you *are* is watching the playoffs from home — again — and you seem quite comfortable with that “moving forward.”

  35. Analytics is for teams that don’t have stunningly good QBs like Herbert, Burrow, Mahomes, etc.

    Once you get a QB like that, you don’t need the excuse/cover of relying on analytics, and we are seeing how it can hamper ultimate success.

  36. The data does not support Tom Telesco keeping his job. He failed with Philip Rivers and is in the process of failing again with Herbert. Bad personnel decisions, bad coaching decisions. Survey says… fire Telesco.

  37. Data is good, Faulty data is bad, and believing in data is misguided as it can be manipulated

  38. the data did not compute when said hc with a defensive background fielded a unit that was awful.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.