Owners approve overtime rule change for the postseason

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell Press Conference
Getty Images

NFL owners approved a proposal to change its overtime rules for the postseason. Both teams now will be guaranteed a possession in overtime in the playoffs before the game becomes sudden death.

The Chiefs’ thrilling 42-36 overtime victory over the Bills in the divisional round reignited the debate about the league’s overtime rules. The Chiefs scored a touchdown on the first possession of overtime to deny Josh Allen and the Bills from seeing the ball in the extra period.

Under the new rules, the Bills would have gotten a possession after the Chiefs either tried a PAT or a two-point conversion.

Owners considered two proposals Tuesday.

The Titans’ proposal allowed for the team with the first possession in overtime to win only with a touchdown and a successful two-point conversion. The Colts and Eagles’ proposal, guaranteeing a possession for each team, is the one that passed.

So it seems that the team that wins the coin toss in overtime may choose to kick, rather than receive, so that it knows exactly what it needs for a tie and what it needs for a win.

95 responses to “Owners approve overtime rule change for the postseason

  1. After the first overtime game where both teams score touchdowns on their first possession and the first team wins on their second overtime possession with a field goal you will hear calls for another rule change!

  2. Well, at least there are no goofy “pick your starting spot” or “everybody starts at the opposing teams 40 yard line” type of rules.

    This will be remembered as the rule change because “Josh Allen didn’t get the ball in OT” situation that occurred.

    But don’t forget that this all started when the Saints were “Booth Reviewed” down the field multiple times so they could kick their winning FG.

    Now this should be known as the Brett Favre Rule w/ the Josh Allen twist.

  3. What happens if the team that kicks off to start OT recovers an onside kick and they then just kick a FG. Is the game then over.

  4. If they want to make this change, they should put the 10-minute overtime period back to 15 minutes. The team that possesses the ball first will put a premium on burning the clock. A good running game drive can eat up 8 minutes of clock or more.

  5. I think you meant the opposite… “So it seems likely that the team that wins the coin toss in overtime now will chose to receive, rather than kick, so it knows exactly what it needs for a tie and what it needs for a win.”

  6. Looks like you meant to say that the team winning the coin toss would choose to kick, not receive. It is still the wrong decision because you still want the first possession that is sudden death.

  7. So it seems likely that the team that wins the coin toss in overtime now will chose to receive, rather than kick, so it knows exactly what it needs for a tie and what it needs for a win.

    —-
    I think you mean that the other way around?

  8. This is so weak. From sudden death to >Both teams possess ball with the TD ending game to >Everyone gets a trophy. After 3 hours of chances everyone gets another chance

    It’s reactionary and codependent

  9. How is this any more “fair”?

    The team that has the second possession has a HUGE advantage. They can play 4 down football if they need to because they know exactly what they need to do. The first team can’t do that.

    It’s not as simple a fix as it’s been made to be.

  10. So everyone gets a trophy? SMFH. It’s simple, win the coin toss, score and win. Lose the coin toss, stop them with your defense then let your offense score and win. Why are we changing the basic fundamentals of Football which is defense vs. offense?

  11. So it seems likely that the team that wins the coin toss in overtime now will chose to receive, rather than kick, so it knows exactly what it needs for a tie and what it needs for a win.

    Say what and it’s choose not chose

  12. Great….now when both team A and Team B score on their possessions and Team a scores again people will whine that team B should have had another chance

  13. After both teams get a possession and the first team drives the field and kicks a FG to win in sudden death arent we going to be right back where we started with the “it’s not fair” whining?

  14. It’s called how about playing some defense and make a stop since defense is also part of the game. I guess if both teams score in overtime they’ll have to keep playing till they tie again and then keep playing some more. Five hour games! Yay!

  15. So in last years playoff game – the Bills likely score – but then kickoff to chiefs – and likely get a fg and win , so it still mostly comes down to who wins the coin toss .

  16. Doubt it will ever go to a second offensive possession to a team. The team scoring the second TD in overtime will go for a 2 point conversion.
    Which odds do you prefer – going for a 2 point conversion, or trying to stop the opposition from just a field goal? When the defenses are completely gassed!

  17. So when it went against Kansas City (against the Patriots) nobody cared. But when Kansas City benefited from it now it “needs to be changed”? Noted.

  18. Wow it takes them this long to fix the overtime rules. This should of been adopted years ago.

  19. Remember when Cincy shut down the Chiefs in the first possession of OT, then took the ball from them, drove down the field, and won the game? Me too. Don’t act like it’s impossible. This rule change is ridiculous.

  20. I liked the Titans plan. The team with first possession and scores has a tough decision to make on the PAT or go for 2 and end it right there.

  21. This new world order of everyone gets a trophy, everyone gets a medal, sports are fair and equal, all this is ruining sports and competition.

  22. The easiest solution is to make overtime just extra time. Continue the game for another 15 minutes with sudden death rules. No reason to treat the OT like the end of a half. Just swap ends of the field and keep playing. That’s fair and simple. Teams will start the extra timed period exactly where they deserve to be.

  23. Why not just hand out participation ribbons? Championships for everyone!

  24. I guess playing defense in the last 2 minutes of regulation wasn’t ever considered to be an option

  25. GoodellMustGo says:
    March 29, 2022 at 12:57 pm
    How is this any more “fair”?

    The team that has the second possession has a HUGE advantage. They can play 4 down football if they need to because they know exactly what they need to do. The first team can’t do that.

    It’s not as simple a fix as it’s been made to be.

    ———-

    Just eliminate overtime punting and have each team start from their own 20 yard line with each team getting the same 4 downs.

  26. Rocket Science. Leave it to greedy billionares who no nothing except how much money it gets them. Was this EVER supposed to be a complex issue?

  27. After both teams get their possession and it is still a tie, the team with the most rush yards during regular time should decide kick/receive for the sudden death period.

  28. I assume whoever wins the toss chooses to kick or receive and the other team chooses which side to defend or attack. Otherwise, everyone will choose to receive and go with the wind.

  29. I still can’t believe the Chiefs scored in regulation to send it into OT.Was the Bills special teams coach fired for allowing a touchback? Maybe not his call but he should have fallen on the ground with a tantrum to get his point across if the HC overrode him.

  30. littlelarrysellers says:
    March 29, 2022 at 1:10 pm
    I liked the Titans plan. The team with first possession and scores has a tough decision to make on the PAT or go for 2 and end it right there.
    ————————————————————————
    Yes, because that solves the vexed issue about poor old Team B not getting the ball back to be able to make a reply if Team A gets the ball first in OT and scores.

    Which is why this nonsense has happened in the first place.

    Makes me laugh, though, because in a years time the same people demanding this change will moan about how the new system is also still not fair.

  31. For those who think it’s crazy these OT rule changes, we actually have a man being allowed to compete against women in swimming. And he’s dominating. If anyone thinks that’s ok, you are demented.

  32. Media completely ignores the fact Bengals threw water on all the phony outrage the following week by showing how it’s done and why the rules worked. Disrespectful, but typical for the media to act like the last postseason overtime game we saw was KC vs Bills.

  33. So basically this rule fixes nothing and still makes it about the coin toss. I really thought that the people running a 10 Billion Dollar Business would be able to have the foresight to see 2 possessions into the future. It has to be continuous equal possessions or a timed quarter !!!

    In baseball they have last Bat… in hockey and soccer they get equivalent penalty shots for a shootout. The NFL people are just dumb I guess

  34. This isn’t the football we old folks grew up with. They have changed the rules so much in favor of the offense because fans prefer high scoring games. A byproduct is that sudden death means winning the coin toss and getting a few first downs against handcuffed defenses equals easy wins. This adds strategy back. Kicking instead of receiving gives you an advantage by knowing what you need. But if you need 7, you may go for 2 knowing that the other team can now win with a field goal. Or the first team could go for 2 to put more pressure on the second team. This new way adds risk and reward where the current way doesn’t.

  35. Teams will definitely kick away more. However, we will see that teams that take the ball and score a 7, will basically win the same amount of games as they do today. The chances go from zero for the second team to win to maybe 5% because the opposing team need to score a TD and a two-point conversion or take the single and risk giving it back for a sudden death FG.

    In cases where the first team marches it for a TD the only change will probably be that the opposing team won’t complain because they actually got to touch the ball. The results will likely be the same.

  36. And next year, we will have a thrilling score fest that ends in a tie. In OT both teams will trade touchdowns and 2 pt tries and the OT coin toss winner will march down and kick a game winning field goal. After that happens, PFT will launch a new campaign to get the unfair OT rules changed.

  37. Never made sense for only one team to have possession in OT. How many other sports decide the outcome of games like that?

  38. If you keep the OT coin toss, this format is the best improvement possible. Beyond that, if you still find some flaws, then give the ball to the 4th quarter receiving team to start OT.

  39. splash79 says:
    March 29, 2022 at 12:51 pm
    What happens if the team that kicks off to start OT recovers an onside kick and they then just kick a FG. Is the game then over.
    ————————————————–
    Should be. The receiving team had the opportunity to possess, so the kicking team recovering the kickoff would count as the second possession. With onside kicking rules what they are, a coach would have to be extremely confident in his special teams.

  40. Oh joy, the whiners get rewarded again…
    No matter how much people think otherwise, defence is still an integral part of the game. You should not be rewarded for the simple fact that you can’t stop anybody, even with only 13 seconds left on the clock.

  41. Great to see them finally taking some action, but it’s short-sighted to not use it in the regular season. That would give teams a chance to get used to the new rules before the playoffs.

  42. In the Bills/Chiefs example. Mahomes went down and scored a TD. So now under these rules, Josh Allen gets the ball back, goes down and scores a TD. Then the Chiefs get the ball back and kick a field goal… game over… decided by the coin toss.

    Tell me again how that’s an improvement at all?

  43. The best solution is one that hasn’t been considered.

    First, eliminate OT in the regular season. If you don’t win in 60 min, it’s a tie.

    Then, make playoff OT full 15 minute quarters until 1 team is the winner. Can you imagine being able to watch another full quarter or two of Mahomes/Allen going back and forth?

  44. The rules are interpreted and enforced by human being. Regardless of what you might think, humans have biases. If anyone thinks this new rule is going to satisfy the complainers, I have a bridge I’d like to sell you.

  45. Nope. Coin toss winner will still take the ball first. Look at the numbers. The team that gets the ball first in Playoff OT has won 83% of the time. Not all on the first possession either.

  46. Either way, Playoff OT is a disaster for both teams. 73% of Playoff OT winners who had a game the following week LOST

  47. New overtime rule. Both teams get a possession, team 1 gets the ball scores a td(6pts) they must kick the extra point(6+1=7
    Team 2 gets the ball score a td(6pts) must go for 2…they score the 2 pt. Conversion. Win by 1 game over.
    Same game. If team 1 misses the extra point they lose a pt.(6-1=5) team 2 score a td on there possession (6pts) game over

  48. Is there another coin toss after each team has the ball in overtime, or does it go back to the team that had the ball 1st? This would truly determine whether you want to go on defense or offense 1st in the overtime. If each team scores the same amount of points, is it a whole new ‘period’ called double overtime or sudden death?

  49. Surprised they didn’t go with option of having the OT winner decided by a 3-member panel consisting of Colin Kaepernick, Rachel Dolezal, and Hilaria Baldwin based on their scholarly wisdom in weighing the racial histories of the respective team mascots. We’ll have to wait until 2028 I guess

  50. LOL. WHY would any team EVER forfeit the first shot at the potential sudden death, in exchange for knowing how much/little they need to score to win if they get the stop?? Who thinks this up?!

  51. The second team has a large knowledge advantage. They know how many points they need, and they can go for it on 4th down every time.

    The team that gets the ball second will probably win 80% of the OT games.

  52. savagestarlight says:
    March 29, 2022 at 1:42 pm
    Never made sense for only one team to have possession in OT. How many other sports decide the outcome of games like that?

    Soccer. Hockey.

  53. Rule change is good but I would have added that 1) the 2nd team must go for a TD in the event the first team scored a field goal or 2) the 2nd team must go for a 2 pt conversion if the first team scored a touchdown.

  54. This is idiocy. Basically, it’s “we’ll keep playing until one team doesn’t score a touchdown”. Might as well adopt the college OT rules.

  55. Guess this didn’t make sense to them when it happened in 2018 with Brady and Mahomes, but now it must be done, lol.

  56. I wonder what would happen if there was a recovered onsides kick on what would be the first possession of the receiving team? Would that count as a possession for the receiving team? They never actually got the ball.

  57. I don’t get it. The new change is fair giving both teams a chance on both offense and defense….? Of course wackos will conjure up weird scenarios but come on keep it simple and fair.

  58. Seems to me if you can play well enough to win in four quarters, the OT rules won’t matter. Why not guarantee everyone gets a possession with the wind and playing flag football to prevent any “unfair” injury advantages. Give me a break!!

  59. The Pga tour plays extra holes until a player wins. The NHL plays a regular overtime to win – 20 minute periods in the playoffs. The NBA plays 10 minute overtimes to win in the playoffs. Major league baseball plays extras to win in the playoffs. The NFL is the only team to decide by a coin toss. This rule upgrade is a partial step towards what it should be. It should be a 10 minute overtime period and if at the end still tied another 10 minute overtime. Dont give me the player safety stuff, it is about the benjamins when it comes to that otherwise they wouldnt have Thursday night football unless the teams are coming off a bye week.

  60. Finally took something that had a simple solution and implemented it. In the rulebook it should now say something like “Both teams get possession in overtime. If still tied, then it becomes sudden death”. That it took this long for them to get the playoff OT rules correct is kind of mind boggling for a multi-billion dollar corporation. Then again, maybe not…..

  61. I Hope the Chiefs and Bills play in the playoffs Again with the game going to overtime, both teams getting possession and the Chiefs Winning, so we can do this all over again with some other new OT rules.

  62. Always the same people complaining about change. Just like life, they wish they could turn the clock back to 1970.

  63. GoodellMustGo says:
    How is this any more “fair”?

    The team that has the second possession has a HUGE advantage. They can play 4 down football if they need to because they know exactly what they need to do. The first team can’t do that.

    It’s not as simple a fix as it’s been made to be.

    ——————————————

    Are they supposed to let them play offense simultaneously?
    To be honest, I think they should explore treating the OT as a “5th quarter” where the game just keeps going if the game is tied. Otherwise you’ll always have this coin toss issue. Additionally, you get situations where an offense drives down and scores a game tying TD then wins the coin toss and the defense has to play back-to-back, which might seem more messed up than anything, honestly. I don’t know the right answer, honestly, but I know it doesn’t feel “fun” or “good” watching a team get beat possibly not having really had a possession on offense for a real long time.

    And yes, I get defense is part of the game too. But why is it always the losing team’s defense that should have “stepped up”, but not the winning teams?

  64. fordbw says:
    This is idiocy. Basically, it’s “we’ll keep playing until one team doesn’t score a touchdown”. Might as well adopt the college OT rules.

    ————————–

    Basically, it’s not what you just said at all.

  65. Why not just give every team that qualified for the playoffs a Lombardi trophy. This is where sports are headed in the country.

  66. If the Bills could have made a stop with 13 seconds left then we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

  67. Lots of comments from people who fear change and drink the fox news koolaid. Clearly this is a reasonable and necessary change due to previous rules altered to favor the offense.

  68. I wonder if there are any stats on how many times the rush 2 or 3 drop 9 or 8 (prevent D) has been successful in securing a win. The eye test seems lower than it probably is, but my team may have just been a victim more times than not. Play some damn D at end of the game and these complications would be less, well, complicated,

  69. patsfan4lifedynasty says:
    March 29, 2022 at 1:04 pm
    The NFL is trying their hardest to give the Bills the SB.

    Bill Belichick helped by drafting Mac Jones. We appreciate it

  70. What happens if both teams score a TD and PAT? Does the team that got the ball first win if they get a FG on their second possession? The odds are lower that this happens but it can happen, especially since the team with the ball 2nd KNOWS it has to score a TD so it’s 4 down territory the entire way. This sounds marginally better, but still isn’t great.

  71. “The Chiefs’ thrilling 42-36 overtime victory”?? Are you kidding? The outcome of the game was a product of a complete collapse by the coaching staff of the Buffalo Bills. Yes, the Chiefs did prevail. But they never should have.

  72. “The Chiefs’ thrilling 42-36 overtime victory”?? Are you kidding? The outcome of the game was a product of a complete collapse by the coaching staff of the Buffalo Bills. Yes, the Chiefs did prevail. But they never should have.

    _____

    Why is that? Buffalo hadnt outplayed or out scored KC in regulation.

    In fact, the Bills gave up 8 scores on 11 KC possessions, and one of those misses was a missed FG, so it could have been 9 of 11.
    KC 552 yards Buff 422
    TOP KC 36 minutes Buff 27
    First Downs KC 30 Buff 23

    Finally, Buffalo goes ahead with 13 measley seconds left. Their top ranked defense (LOL) gives up 44 yards in 3 plays and lets KC tie the game….then they give up an 8 play 75 yard drive for a TD in OT….11 plays 119 yards (11 yds/play!) and 10 points in 2 drives.

    Why shouldnt KC have won the game?

  73. Finally, Buffalo goes ahead with 13 measley seconds left. Their top ranked defense (LOL) gives up 44 yards in 3 plays and lets KC tie the game….then they give up an 8 play 75 yard drive for a TD in OT….11 plays 119 yards (11 yds/play!) and 10 points in 2 drives.

    Why shouldnt KC have won the game?

    You miss the point. This isn’t about fair or who should have won the game. God, if it was about that they would fire all officials and hire new ones or, even better, use robots to officiate. The point is making a better product. Making the most important and most watched games more exciting. Nothing would have been more exciting than seeing Buffalo get the ball back and face a 4th and 7 from the KC 45. That’s exciting. Forcing the coaches to make important decisions instead of only taking the ball? Exciting. This is good for the game, and it’s not even worth debating.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.