Bengals, Vikings, Dolphins voted against overtime change for playoffs

Wild Card Round - Minnesota Vikings v New Orleans Saints
Getty Images

Twenty-nine teams voted to change the overtime rules for the postseason. Three teams did not. Per multiple reports, the nays consisted of the Bengals, Vikings, and Dolphins.

Earlier this year, the Bengals overcame the prior overtime rule in an AFC Championship win over the Chiefs, intercepting Kansas City on the opening drive of the extra session and thereafter scoring the first points. In 2020, the Vikings benefited from the rule, scoring a first-drive touchdown to beat the Saints in overtime of a wild-card game.

The Dolphins rarely have been to the playoffs since Dan Marino retired. So they have no recent experience, one way or the other, with the playoff overtime rule.

Via TheAthletic.com, the Vikings objected to the fact that the team that takes possession after a first-drive touchdown has unlimited time to score. The Bengals, in contrast, often vote against anything and everything. When the overtime rule first changed in 2010 to prevent a first-drive win based on a field goal, the Bengals and three others opposed the measure. In 2019, the Bengals were the only team that voted against making pass interference calls and non-calls subject to replay review. (The league abandoned that approach after one year, given — frankly — the inability of the league office to properly apply a consistent replay standard to interference calls and non-calls.)

Given that the league made the rule change permanent, the three holdouts won’t get a chance to recruit six others to join them in 2023. To scrap the current rule, at least 24 teams must vote to change it.

9 responses to “Bengals, Vikings, Dolphins voted against overtime change for playoffs

  1. The team that gets the ball second has a huge advantage. If they kept the OT period to 10 minutes instead of giving them all the time in the world, that would at least even things out a bit.

  2. Yeah the no time limit thing is odd, once again when the NFL does finally make aove they overreach.

  3. Mike Brown always votes against everyone and will somehow destroy something that is potentially special right now on Cinci.

  4. Its the playoffs…. game times unlimited until a team wins regardless if its sudden death or new rules

  5. “Competitive rebuild” is an oxymoron says:
    March 30, 2022 at 11:03 am
    The team that gets the ball second has a huge advantage. If they kept the OT period to 10 minutes instead of giving them all the time in the world, that would at least even things out a bit.
    ——————————-

    Expect that if they tie it, then the team that got it first can now win it with a FG.

  6. They should have just adopted the college OT rule. That is the “fairest” of all options as both teams get the same amount of chances on offense.

  7. They should have just adopted the college OT rule. That is the “fairest” of all options as both teams get the same amount of chances on offense.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    This also should shorten up the overtime playing time. 2pt conversion required on all TDs from the start of the OT

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.