Mike Vrabel: New OT rule is a very good step

NFL Combine
Getty Images

While the proposal the Titans put forward to alter the overtime rules ultimately did not go through, Tennessee head coach Mike Vrabel was still pleased with the result from this week’s annual league meeting.

Owners passed the Colts and Eagles proposal for the postseason on Tuesday, which means that each team is guaranteed a possession in overtime. The catalyst for the change was the Bills and Chiefs thriller that ended after Kansas City’s first OT drive ended in a touchdown.

Vrabel, a member of the NFL’s competition committee, said the league wanted to start with the postseason before making the change permanent for all regular-season games.

“Those numbers are pretty strong for the team that takes possession of the football first, whether that’s on the first drive or the third drive,” Vrabel said, via Jim Wyatt of the Titans’ website. “So, it’s a very good step to try and allow each of these offenses, especially these quarterbacks that we are seeing, allow them to have an impact on the football game.”

If the new rule had been in effect last year, the Bills-Chiefs game would have continued after tight end Travis Kelce‘s overtime touchdown. But nothing would have been different about the AFC Championship Game, during which the Bengals picked off quarterback Patrick Mahomes early on in the overtime period. Cincinnati defeated Kansas City to advance to Super Bowl LVI.

28 responses to “Mike Vrabel: New OT rule is a very good step

  1. The Chiefs were scoffed at three years ago when they suggested a similar change. People liked the overtime rule back then since it benefited Brady. Now…not so much.

  2. Now all they have to do is eliminate the OT coin toss and tie it to the opening toss and we’re all set.

    Winner of the opening toss gets his choice on opening kick AND OT (if there is one) OR winner defers choice to 2nd half.

    Done deal.

    No more whining.

  3. A ‘very good step’ indeed. To me, it was the only step possible. Defense and offense of both teams will be involved.

  4. With all of the rule changes over the years favoring the Offense it has become very necessary to make this rule change for OT.

  5. Not a fan. This PC whine of it’s not fair discounts the previous 60 minutes. I’d much rather see a 15 minute quarter played to the end.

  6. qcsfinest704 says:
    March 30, 2022 at 9:58 am
    So playing defense is out of the question

    I’ve heard a lot of people say this and I guess i don’t understand the sentiment.

    BOTH teams now have to play defense

  7. Everyone is onboard until the new rule doesn’t work for them….then they will be calling for a change. Also games that go into overtime effect television schedules which are tight on regular season Sundays, the new rule could make games longer. Probably why it’s being limited to playoff games.

  8. Guess what? Overtime is a fake result. Two teams played to a tie in regulation. That is the real outcome of the game.

    I’m old enough to remember ties and to me they were not all that bad. If neither team has the ability to win it in regulation, then setting up a fake ending is the real outcome? The real outcome is the tie.

    There’s also a player safety issue.

  9. That should’ve been the rule ever since the Vikings and Favre didn’t get to touch the ball in In the NFC championship versus the Saints.. Lost on a field goal aided by questionable PI calls. Way too many teams winning OT games in playoffs due to winning a coin flip.

  10. Just add 5 minutes to the clock and keep going if it’s tied at the end of the 4th quarter. No stoppage, no coin flip. Just keep playing. Still tied after 5 minutes, add another 5. No more arbitrary endings to games.

  11. The current overtime rule is the worst & the most unfair in whole of sport, it might as well be decided on the coin flip.
    A half a step in the right direction, however it should apply in the regular season as well!
    No reason why it can’t and it’s just rubbish to suggest because of tight TV schedules or player safety 😡

  12. therealraider says:
    March 30, 2022 at 9:47 am
    Why even have a coin flip? “Heads/Tails you both get the ball”

    ——

    Because if both teams score then the team who had the ball 1st gets it again

  13. If you’re gonna give the other team a chance,play a 15 minute quarter,or go back to sudden death. Some of the greatest playoff games involved sudden death. Oakland vs Baltimore 78,San Diego Miami 82, Kansas City vs Miami 71.2 of those games went into the second overtime,those teams made plays during those overtime periods to keep themselves in the game. Feeling sorry for the other team just because they couldn’t stop the other is no good. You gotta play.

  14. pftancelledme says:
    March 30, 2022 at 11:40 am
    Mike Vrabel is a Sore Loser.

    —————————–

    Wild nonsense. Vrabel’s most recent loss–against the Bengals in the playoffs–was during regulation. Vrabel is 5-1 in OT as Titans head coach. How exactly is he a sore loser for wanting to update the overtime rule?

  15. There will still be changes when this isnt good enough. Some team will lose and whine about it till the media picks up on it. Some people are Never satisfied.

  16. harryhodag says:
    March 30, 2022 at 10:43 am
    Guess what? Overtime is a fake result. Two teams played to a tie in regulation. That is the real outcome of the game.

    I’m old enough to remember ties and to me they were not all that bad. If neither team has the ability to win it in regulation, then setting up a fake ending is the real outcome? The real outcome is the tie.

    There’s also a player safety issue.

    Overtime started in 1955, so you’re up there if you remember regulation ties. That was why the original OT was a true sudden death situation… first score and it’s over. I had no problem with true sudden death either – no one wanted to keep playing or watching. Yes, there were a few epic playoff OT games in the 70s and 80s because the teams were unable to score into a second OT period. But that happened so rarely, no one assumed a rule change was necessary.

  17. What happens if both teams possess the ball at least once and the OT ends in another tie? Do they have to repeat a 2nd OT like this? When does it end?

  18. Wouldn’t it be easier to just start the season and give every team a Lombardi trophy and then to not play any games to see who the losers will be?

  19. So now a team that loses the coin toss can send the 2nd string D out there and KNOW they’ll still get another chance on offense, that sends a nice message!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.