George Paton explains relevance of having a quarterback who is “a winner,” like Russell Wilson

DENVER BRONCOS, NFL
Getty Images

When the Broncos introduced quarterback Russell Wilson in March, G.M. George Paton said of Wilson, among other things, “he’s a winner.” That’s a term that sets some people off, given the lingering debate over whether wins are relevant to the assessment of quarterbacks.

Paton visited #PFTPM this week. I asked him to explain his position on the connection between quarterbacks and winning, specifically as it relates to the acquisition of Russell Wilson.

“I just think you look at the teams that have won,” Paton said. “And what’s the common trait? Typically, it’s a quarterback. And then you look at Russ’s record. Over the first 10 years he’s won more games than any quarterback I believe in history. That’s a pretty good record of winning. . . . He’s a winner. The proof is in the pudding. Look at his record. He wins games. Now, they had a lot of good players around him, I get it. And we’re gonna need a lot of good players around him. And hopefully we have enough around him where we can take that next step.”

The reality is that some quarterbacks get more from the players around him. From everyone around him.

“There’s something different,” Paton said. “I experienced that for one year, two years actually, when we got [Brett] Favre in Minnesota. I remember that first practice. Really, you knew it. It elevated everyone. And it didn’t just elevate the players. It elevated the people in the building, the work ethic, the accountability. We feel that here with Russ.”

The fact that Paton didn’t experience that same feeling with the arrival of Kirk Cousins in 2018 is relevant to this conversation as well. Cousins is not a winner, at least not consistently and not in big games. And Paton, who was with the Vikings when Cousins arrived, apparently didn’t experience the same feeling when Cousins had his first practice in Minnesota.

This is one of those places where the effort to turn everything about football into a mathematical formula needs to acknowledge the simple human reality that certain personalities can get more from their teammates than others can, whether through words or actions or just merely walking through the door. Anyone who has played football at any level knows that certain people can get players to perform better than they otherwise would perform. The Broncos are banking on Wilson bringing that with him to Denver — like Peyton Manning did a decade ago.

28 responses to “George Paton explains relevance of having a quarterback who is “a winner,” like Russell Wilson

  1. This is absolutely true. Some people just elevate others around them. That’s called being a leader

  2. Winners don’t throw goal line INT’s in the super bowl with the game on the line.

  3. He is one hundred percent correct. If you look at every SB winning team & you will find that every one of them had a QB. Of course every time a team has lost, they had a QB. So…. I guess to be really accurate, he should say every team has a QB, win or lose.

    That said; Russell is a winner. Stats show that. He was by far the best QB the Seahawks have ever had.

  4. Cousins is easily a better pocket passer than wilson and their records the past 3 years is roughly the same.

  5. minime says:
    May 8, 2022 at 12:09 pm
    Winners don’t throw goal line INT’s in the super bowl with the game on the line.

    ————-

    Get a clue. Smart coaches give the ball to Beast Mode in that moment

  6. He’s a wonderful player and playmaker but he’s nowhere near the passer Broncos fans assume they are getting. Imagine getting such a high profile guy then in the toughest division in football finishing last again!

  7. Teams win games not QB’s it takes the whole franchise top to bottom.

  8. Kirk Cousins + Legion of Boom = Russell Wilson.

    There’s a reason Russell struggled with wins the last few years as the Seattle roster fell apart on defense.

    Drew Brees had 3 years in a row at 7-9 when his defense was bottom 10. Aaron Rodgers went 6-10 the same way.

    George is being silly.

  9. He is a winner. How hard is it to be a winner when you enter the league and the 5 five years of your career you have the #1 Ranked Defense and a top #3 running game. Wilson is so incredibly over rated .

  10. First ballot HOF after winning at least two more Super Bowls.

    If you’re still debating this, you’re not a football fan, you’re something else.

  11. Yeah but he’s not going to win 2 more super bowls – the broncos are thinking they’re getting the Russ from 5 years ago but in reality he’s declining rather quickly –
    Kansas City- 12-5
    Los Angelas -10-7
    Las Vegas- 9-8
    Denver – 7-10

  12. The NFL is a QB league. There is a huge correlation between winning and your QB. I’m not talking about winning college QB’s becoming good pro’s. That’s completely different.

  13. Paton is right.

    Wilson is a special player; we can quantify it objectively if you like, or subjectively, just as well.

    Look up Belichick’s quotes re: Russell Wilson, he does not speak that way about just any player.

    I have observed this League week in out and week out going back to 1971. Absolutely no dog in the fight. I am prepared to compare and contrast Dan Pastorini, Craig Morton, Joe Gilliam, you name him, any QB from the past half-century of the NFL, just as well.

    Wilson is a special player.

  14. Should have handed it to BEast Mode. History would be much different for sure.

  15. He can’t make that same comment about Cousins simply because it could be looked at as tampering.

  16. John Elway knows all about buying a QB at the end of his career and squeezing one last year out of him but drafting one….. well that’s a whole different story.

  17. Russell won’t let Beastmode win Super Bowl MVP. It’s all about himself BLA-BLA LOOK AT ME BLA-BLA. Broncos will never make it to Super Bowl with this guy.

  18. Wilson wasn’t great at the start of his career, and he doesn’t seem that great now, but at his peak for about four seasons, he was in the neighborhood of top 5 qbs in the league. At the same time, in the biggest throw of his life, he threw an interception, that’s part of his legacy, and it can’t be dismissed as a bad play call. If you’re talking about Marshawn Lynch’s or Richard Sherman’s legacy, you can call it a bad play call, but Wilson threw the interception himself. I can’t stress that enough.

  19. Get a clue. Smart coaches give the ball to Beast Mode in that moment
    ——
    Coach didn’t throw the ball.

  20. Wilson has more wins in his first 10 seasons than any QB in history

    Wilson is 2nd only to Peyton Manning in passing TDs in their first 10 seasons – and on a run first team

    As for the interception in the SB – Wilson did exactly what he was supposed to. The ball was out of his hands before Ricardo Lockette made his break.

    Anyone who knows anything about football and watches the tape knows Kearse had the assignment of picking Malcolm Butler. Instead of doing his assignment, Kearse stood there like a lamppost. So Butler had a path to the ball he should never have had, it would have been an easy TD for Wilson

  21. Anyone who knows anything about football and watches the tape knows Kearse had the assignment of picking Malcolm Butler. Instead of doing his assignment, Kearse stood there like a lamppost. So Butler had a path to the ball he should never have had, it would have been an easy TD for Wilson
    ==========

    Kearse was mauled by Brandon Browner

    Bottom line; The Pats knew what was coming. They played it perfectly.

  22. As for the interception in the SB – Wilson did exactly what he was supposed to. The ball was out of his hands before Ricardo Lockette made his break.
    ============

    The Title-deciding play-call is a bang-bang play to the #5 WR, best known as a gunner on ST.

    You don’t have a problem with that?

  23. Wilson is a winner and was an elite QB. The problem is his mobility was one of the major reasons, overcoming his height. He no longer has the mobility and he can’t avoid rushing DLine like he once could. Yet he insists on holding the ball, looking for the kill shot. He throws a beautiful long ball but he’ll wrack up sacks in Den just as he did in Sea.

    Oh and he wants $50M / year.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.