Tom Brady denies existence of “substantive issues” in his relationship with Bruce Arians

Tampa Bay Buccaneers Mandatory Minicamp
Getty Images

Buccaneers quarterback Tom Brady had not conducted a press conference since coach Bruce Arians stepped down. When Brady finally faced reporters on Thursday, he was asked about one of the biggest topics of the offseason — his relationship with Arians.

The first question on the topic, based on the transcript circulated by the team, posed the question of whether there were any “substantive issues” between Brady an Arians.

“Zero whatsoever,” Brady said. “He and I have a great relationship. I think that’s part of why I chose here was because of Bruce. He and I have been in incredible communication, and I have great respect for him. He knows how I feel about him, and that’s the most important thing. And I know how he feels about me.”

Brady then was asked whether he was bothered by reported that he had a strained relationship with Arians.

“I don’t read a lot of them,” Brady said. (They all say they don’t read the reports, and yet they all seem to somehow be keenly aware of the contents of the reports.) “There are a lot of things that aren’t right that are said. I think the thing is — you try and come out and respond to everything that is not right [but] we don’t have to be right very often. We just have to be right every so often these days. I think if people click on it, then you read more of it, and obviously they’re clicking on it, so it’s what people want and what is talked about. It may not be accurate and that’s OK. I don’t make every pass either. I don’t complete every pass, so I understand not everyone can get it right all of the time.”

But this narrative wasn’t started by some pencil-necked clickbait artist. The fuse originally was lit by one of Brady’s former teammates, offensive lineman Rich Ohrnberger. So Brady had even more reason to be aware of the issue, and even more cause to not opt for complete and total silence.

Besides, Brady made it abundantly clear last June that he rarely should be listened to, on anything regarding any and all “substantive issues.”

“What I say versus what I think are two totally different things,” Brady said in an appearance on The Shop. “I would say 90 percent of what I say is probably not what I’m thinking. Which is challenging, you know? And I really admire people that actually can do that and say what they think, because they invite a lot of things into their life. And I think part of me that doesn’t like conflict, so in the end I always try to play it super flat.”

So why would he tell anyone that he had any sort of issue with Arians, or that Brady directly or indirectly hinged his return to the team on Arians not returning as the head coach? That’s exactly the kind of conflict that he avoids by concealing his true feelings.

As I’ve said before, I was told the night that Brady unretired that the next move in Tampa would be Arians stepping down. Seventeen days later, Arians did.

Also, consider this. If it’s true that “part of why I chose here was because of Bruce,” why wasn’t there a single expression of confusion, frustration, or consternation from Brady when, only 17 days after Brady decided to renew vows with the Bucs, Arians walked out the door? If the presence of Arians was such a key reason for Brady to be in Tampa, wouldn’t Brady be upset that, shortly after emerging from retirement, Arians rides off into the sunset?

So here’s the real question for any critical thinkers out there. Do Brady’s words about Arians fall within the 90 percent of the things Brady says that don’t reflect what he’s actually thinking, or do they fall within the 10 percent of the things he says that actually do?

The answer as to whether he little-white-lied about his true feelings may lay in his justification for strategic little-white-lying about what he’s really thinking: I really admire people that actually can do that and say what they think, because they invite a lot of things into their life. And I think part of me that doesn’t like conflict, so in the end I always try to play it super flat.

5 responses to “Tom Brady denies existence of “substantive issues” in his relationship with Bruce Arians

  1. It shouldn’t be forgotten that Arians is still in the Bucs building. I don’t see him and Tom ducking each other in the hallways.
    I think if Brady really didn’t want to see Arian’s face, he would have forced his way to Miami regardless of the Flores lawsuit.

  2. I think Brady considered Arians to be a mediocre coach. Plus, I think Brady was pissed at the abrupt manner in which Arians handled the Antonio Brown incident, taking away a key offensive weapon. A calm response during the game and a decision the next day might have kept Brown on the team for the playoffs. I think the last straw for Brady was Arians’ OK of an all-out blitz in the closing half-minute of the divisional game that put a safety on Cooper Kupp that led to the game-winning completion. This after a rally from 27-3 down. Bottom line: I don’t think Brady is in Tampa for the 2022 season if Arians had still been the head coach.

  3. Its clear that Brady’s greatest strength, and a key talent of most all great “winners,” is that they can “make it work” with many different variables. Belichic rubbed allot of players the wrong way; many good players say they wouldnt play for him. Brady made sure it worked with Belichic, and was able to do what many great QBs couldnt do – be equally effective playing with completely different types of plyers [and completely different offensive schemes] yet he made them all work at a championship level.

    That level of extreme discipline, focus & drive allows Brady to maturely compartmentalize his professional relationships, whether he’s coached by Bill Belichic or Bruce Arians – or if he’s teamed with toxic players like his former gangster-murderer TE Hernandez, or severly unstable WR Antonio Brown. Those exceptional leadership qualities allowed Brady to “make it work” to win world Championships with them all.

    I would guess that Arian’s inability to “make it work” last year with Brown (however understandble it might be) was a weakness that Brady couldnt “make work” to win a championship that may have been winnable with AB, and Brady “cut him” but likely still appreciates the championship Arians helped him win the previous year and that he still genuinely “likes” Arians as a person and friend. But more than any other trait, Brady has always consistantly & unapologetically will NOT compramize when it comes to any decision he has power over that gives him the best possible chance to win – whether with a player, coach or even himself.

    That IS Brady’s most decernable “difference” from most any other athlete Ive seen except Michael Jorden, who made it work with a vastly different set of player personalities (Rodman; Cartwright; BJ Armstrong, etc) in the Bulls two seperate threepeats. Thats why I believe it is NOT a coincidence that Brady and Jordan are considered the best “winners” of all time in their “best ever” athletic careers

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.