Bruce Smith: Tony Boselli’s Hall of Fame campaign undermined the integrity of the Hall

Jaguars V Bills
Getty Images

Former Jaguars left tackle Tony Boselli will be inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in August, and another Hall of Famer doesn’t seem too happy about that.

Bruce Smith, the Bills great who is the only player in NFL history with 200 sacks, wrote in a lengthy statement on Instagram that he doesn’t consider Boselli among the most accomplished left tackles in NFL history, and also took issue with the focus of Boselli’s Hall of Fame campaign on a particularly good playoff game that Boselli had against Smith.

“A large part of the campaign to promote Tony Boselli into the Hall of Fame seems to hyper focus on a single successful performance he had against me in a 1996 playoff game,” Smith wrote. “On the one hand, I’m quite flattered to be considered the gold standard by which another player’s game can be measured to determine his qualification into the HOF. But on a more serious level, I and other HOFers believe it sets a horrible precedent to negatively zero in on a standing member of the Hall’s play in order to validate the candidacy of a nominee.

“The HOF is an exclusive fraternity that follows a tacit code of conduct which fosters respect and brotherhood between its members. Given the opportunity, any Hall of Famer could use his credentials to boast about his dominance over another member, but such behavior is deemed inappropriate because of the friction and discord it could create within the group. Maintaining harmony and goodwill in the HOF is paramount, and it is precisely why player campaigns have historically been presented respectfully and thoughtfully, allowing the candidate’s stats and complete body of work to speak resoundingly for itself.

“Resorting to underhanded tactics, like targeting a HOFer and hyping a one game matchup to bolster a nominee’s merit as some of Tony’s supporters have done, undermines the integrity of the Hall’s election process. It also invites otherwise unnecessary commentary and scrutiny around that candidate’s worthiness of becoming a member of the HOF. Since Tony’s advocates have slid headlong down this slippery slope and dragged me unwillingly along, I have a few thoughts to share.

“Tony was a formidable opponent during his brief career, but I find it difficult to compare the totality of his body of work with those of the NFL’s greatest left tackles. With the exception of the legendary Anthony Munoz; Jonathan Ogden, Willie Roaf, and Walter Jones all protected the blind side of the quarterback for 12 seasons or more. In Jacksonville, Leon Searcy bore the arduous task of protecting Mark Brunell’s blindside, while Tony benefited from protecting the extremely talented, mobile left handed quarterback.

“During my nineteen years in the NFL several outstanding LTs, such as Bruce Armstrong, Richmond Webb and Will Wilford, all had stellar games against me. Perhaps they too would be wise to build HOF campaigns highlighting that fact.”

Every year scores of Hall of Famers attend the induction ceremony to welcome the new class. Smith doesn’t sound enthused about welcoming Boselli to the fraternity.

57 responses to “Bruce Smith: Tony Boselli’s Hall of Fame campaign undermined the integrity of the Hall

  1. Tony Boselli was one of the greatest OT’s of my era. It’s an absolute shame that his career was cut short due to injuries.

    I’ve never been a fan of placing a guy that was great for a short period, but if you can induct guys like Terrell Davis that played for seven seasons and only reached 1,000 yards four times and 2,000 yards once, while the RB’s that followed in his footsteps also had great results (due to a great blocking scheme) then certainly you can put Boselli into the Hall as well.

    Bruce Smith is just mad because Boselli is one of the few OT’s that could shut him down.

  2. I’ll tell you what – agree or disagree, we should all be impressed by the nature of Smith’s argument. It’s very well laid out, and without going overboard. And the logic is solid too!

  3. I agree with Smith on the brief body of work and HOF standards. I still do not believe that Terrell Davis belongs in the hall for his body of work and years as compared to many shut out.

  4. Bruuuuuuuuuuce !!!!

    As part of his induction speech Boselli should apologize to Smith.

  5. I am not, and have never been, impressed by Bruce Smith.
    IMO he should not be in the Pro Football HoF.

  6. I’ve never been a fan of placing a guy that was great for a short period, but if you can induct guys like Terrell Davis that played for seven seasons and only reached 1,000 yards four times and 2,000 yards once, while the RB’s that followed in his footsteps also had great results (due to a great blocking scheme) then certainly you can put Boselli into the Hall as well.
    ==========

    For 3 years, Davis was arguably the best back in football.. while Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith and Marshall Faulk were on the field.

    Yes, the Shanahan scheme has stood the test of time. But no back has come close to what Davis did 1996-1998. Few backs in history stack up to that run.

  7. I agree. He’s like Darrell Revis whose status seemed to overrate his actual play and/or longevity of play.

    Bruce Armstrong was an outstanding OT on a bad Pats team in the late 80s/early 90s.

    I have no idea how Boselli or some of these other good, but not great players get in, while longstanding, impactful players like Ken Riley or Cliff Branch sit there for decades waiting to get in, or worse, already passed away before getting recognition.

  8. As good as he was, Boselli lacked the career longevity of other great OTs in the Hall, so that has to count as a strike against him. The fact that he chose to highlight one game to promote his candidacy makes his short career resume even more obvious. A very good, but not great — and not HOF worthy — Left Tackle.

  9. While mentioning all those other greats in his argument , there IS an elephant in the room that may have swayed his opinion.

  10. I agree that the tactics were worthy of calling out. We do not want to see it used in the future. But Tony Boselli is the only player in history to be the #1 overall pick in the NFL draft twice, once out of college and a second in expansion draft. For whatever comparisons Smith wants to make, Boselli was universally regarded as a gold standard LT while he was playing.

  11. “guys like Terrell Davis ” induction into the Hall of Fame is why the NFL HOF is becoming the “Hall of Very Good”

  12. Smith is right … After playing well against him, Boselli got handled by Willie McGinest in the AFC Championship game. Does that make McGinest a HOF player ?

  13. Coming from the guy who averaged 6 sacks over his last three years just to break the sack record?

  14. “was a formidable opponent during his brief career”

    Didnt know Bruce was so articulate.

  15. flash1224 says:

    Sounds like someone is butt hurt————————- Tell him that to his face.

  16. Once the HOF began enshrining very good – but not great – players (like Jerome Bettis for an example) their credibility was completely shot. It really doesn’t mean much anymore.

  17. Maybe B Smith should start his own Hall of Fame. The Bruce Smith Hall of Fame,….. the one squarely inbetween his ears. His ego is bulging out of his ears and mouth. Smith was a great player,… no doubts.
    But Please,…. keep your opinion on Boselli to yourself.

  18. He’ll get over it, he’s just buggin because a day Tony was really good came against Bruce. He’ll be fine !!

  19. For 3 years, Davis was arguably the best back in football.. while Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith and Marshall Faulk were on the field.

    Yes, the Shanahan scheme has stood the test of time. But no back has come close to what Davis did 1996-1998. Few backs in history stack up to that run.
    ========
    Priest Holmes was every bit the back Terrell Davis was. From 2001-2003, while Davis did outrush Holmes due to more carriers (by 146), Holmes averaged the same 4.8 yds per carry, scored 8 more rushing TD’s, and had exactly twice as many receptions and 1,162 more yards receiving than TD. Priest just didn’t get to the postseason or play with a QB like Elway. That’s his undoing.

  20. As my Mom always said Bruce, just because it pops into your head, doesn’t mean you should say it out loud.

  21. To his point, Bruce Armstrong, Richmond Webb and Will Wolford were pretty dominant players during that era. Honestly, I don’t think Boselli would have gotten into the Hall if he wasn’t JAX’s first pick and the pillar of the franchise.

    On another point, Bruce’s argument is pretty well structured but it seems very personal. I wonder what else is going on here.

  22. Not a Denver fan…but TD is in the HOF because he was unstoppable in the ’97 & ’98 playoffs.

  23. “. . . Maintaining harmony and goodwill in the HOF is paramount. . . ”

    Pretty words and a pleasant sentiment from Bruce, but why are harmony and goodwill paramount in the HOF? Who gives a flip about the HOF aura? It’s not like all those old players are sitting in there, conversing with each other while they wait for a customer to straggle in.
    Lighten up, Bruce. Whining is a bad look on you.

  24. The HOF continues to become the Hall of Very Good in order to get people to come to Canton, OH to visit the Hall. If the Hall only let in one or two players annually (I’m looking at you, Cooperstown) then you won’t have as many fans paying to tour the Hall. Not everyone is a “purist” or a pro football historian. Not everyone flocks to Canton to hear about Jim Thorpe and George Halas.

  25. Who cares? Why is he soo salty? So many players in the HOF don’t belong. I’ve seen articles on this website saying that Julian Edelman deserves to get in. It honestly doesn’t take being one of the greatest ever to make it. It takes being one of the best of your era. That is a huge difference. Look at the passing stats of some of the QBs in the hall from the 80s and 90s then compare them to Manning, Rodgers, Brady, and Brees numbers. Not even close.

  26. Priest Holmes was every bit the back Terrell Davis was. From 2001-2003, while Davis did outrush Holmes due to more carriers (by 146), Holmes averaged the same 4.8 yds per carry, scored 8 more rushing TD’s, and had exactly twice as many receptions and 1,162 more yards receiving than TD. Priest just didn’t get to the postseason or play with a QB like Elway. That’s his undoing.
    ==========

    Fair enough.

    Keep in mind, Davis sat 8 quarters of football because Denver was destroying their opponents in 1998.

  27. I have no idea how Boselli or some of these other good, but not great players get in
    ==========

    Started 6 seasons;

    5 Pro Bowls
    3x 1st team All-Pro
    1x 2nd team All-Pro

    If that isn’t greatness, I’m not sure what is.

  28. Terrell Davis post season; (8 games)

    1140 yards rushing (142 yds/gm)
    1271 scrimmage yards (158 yds/gm)
    5.59 yards/carry
    12 touchdowns

  29. Richmond Webb was named to the Pro Bowl in his rookie season. Not even the great Anthony Munoz could claim that. Bruce Smith remarked that Richmond Webb always played him clean. Why Richmond Webb isn’t in the HOF is a mis-carriage of justice.

  30. Tony deserves to be in the Hall ,Bruce . You’re just salty because when they induct him they’ll be showing that footage against you. Tony is the ONLY Jacksonville Jaguar worthy of being inducted.

  31. Priest Holmes was every bit the back Terrell Davis was. From 2001-2003, while Davis did outrush Holmes due to more carriers (by 146), Holmes averaged the same 4.8 yds per carry, scored 8 more rushing TD’s, and had exactly twice as many receptions and 1,162 more yards receiving than TD. Priest just didn’t get to the postseason or play with a QB like Elway. That’s his undoing.
    ===========

    Fair enough.

    I would say its worth noting Davis sat 8 quarters in 1998 beacuse the Broncos were so dominant.

    Also, Davis had a seasons worth of yards in his 8 Playoff games. Averaged 158 scrimmage yds, 5.5 yds/carry, with 12 tds. No surprise the Broncos won 7 of those games.

  32. Didn’t realize boselli was basing his candidacy on one game. I know that boselli had tons of media support that built every year he was left out. Not to mention he was on tv/radio every week. Familiarity and name recognition goes a long way.

    Desperate situations require desperate measures. It meant enough to boselli to go this route. He must be happy with the results.

  33. The Pro Football Hall of Fame is a joke anymore… the fact that TO didn’t get in on his 1st try with his Football credentials was a joke, and the fact that they have a mandatory number of people voted in each year regardless of qualifications makes it a sham.

  34. dryzzt23 says:
    June 14, 2022 at 10:58 am
    I am not, and have never been, impressed by Bruce Smith.
    IMO he should not be in the Pro Football HoF.
    ————————————————————
    If Bruce Smith shouldn’t be in the HOF, who should ?
    In additon to being the All Time Sack leader with 200, Smith is the All Time Leader in Tackles for a Loss. He also had 43 Forced Fumbles, Recovered 15 Fumbles, had 2 Safeties and 2 Interceptions and had a TD. Bruce also had double digit sacks 12 times.

  35. I guess Bruce doesn’t understand that no one takes the Hall of Fame seriously given half the jokers that are in it.

  36. The fact that they induct players every year to promote an event , there are going to be years of just above average players getting in .

  37. jmworacle says:

    June 14, 2022 at 1:28 pm

    Richmond Webb was named to the Pro Bowl in his rookie season. Not even the great Anthony Munoz could claim that. Bruce Smith remarked that Richmond Webb always played him clean. Why Richmond Webb isn’t in the HOF is a mis-carriage of justice.

    13

    4

    Rate This

    —————-

    While it’s true that his pass protection was at the level of the all-time greats, his run blocking was nowhere near that level.

  38. The Least Interesting Man Alive says:
    June 14, 2022 at 1:09 pm
    I have no idea how Boselli or some of these other good, but not great players get in
    ==========

    Started 6 seasons;

    5 Pro Bowls
    3x 1st team All-Pro
    1x 2nd team All-Pro

    If that isn’t greatness, I’m not sure what is.
    _____________________________________________________

    Don’t forget the the fact he was on the 1990’s All Decade Team when he only played half the decade.

  39. Per the Terell Davis/Boselli arguments:

    They had fine careers that should be noted and remembered among local fans. They have elements to be credited for. They did good things.

    But the Hall of Fame is not supposed to be the Hall of Credit For Anyone Who Did Something Good.

  40. Is he saying HOF candidates should be measured by their play against practice squad guys instead? Boselli was a great player, there’s no denying that but his career was cut short by injuries. HOF people say he did enough to justify enshrinement so I’m noy going to argue.

  41. Fair enough.

    Keep in mind, Davis sat 8 quarters of football because Denver was destroying their opponents in 1998.

    ________________________________________________________________________

    That just proves how he benefited from Elway being the QB and the scheme. Hardly mattered who their running back was in that scheme, it always produced 1000 yard rushers.

  42. That just proves how he benefited from Elway being the QB and the scheme. Hardly mattered who their running back was in that scheme, it always produced 1000 yard rushers.
    ==========

    Elway missed 4 games in 1998… while Davis rushed for 2000 yards.

  43. “While it’s true that his pass protection was at the level of the all-time greats, his run blocking was nowhere near that level.”

    They had Dan Marino. They weren’t running the ball

  44. Bruce is among my HOF players for all the unbelievable stuff he accomplished. Call me a Bruce Smith apologist, but, he is truly an unchallengeable member of HOF. I am pretty sure, after observing him for a long, long time, he would have phrased his objection (more of an off the cuff comment) a little differently. Bruce is an intelligent guy and NOT malicious. He probably should have just skipped that comment publicly.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.