NFLPA’s defense of Deshaun Watson will take aim at NFL’s treatment of multiple owners

Cleveland Browns Offseason Workout
Getty Images

Eventually and inevitably, the NFL will take action in the Deshaun Watson case. If that action includes an unpaid suspension imposed under the Personal Conduct Policy, the NFL Players Association will mobilize with an aggressive defense on Watson’s behalf.

Per a source with knowledge of the intended strategy, the NFLPA currently is bracing for a recommendation by the league of “unprecedented” punishment of Watson. Whatever the specific penalty, the union will mobilize to defend Watson, as it is required to do by the federal duty of fair representation.

The source explains that the NFLPA would defend Watson in part by making an aggressive argument premised on the consequences, or lack thereof, imposed on a trio of owners who recently have found themselves embroiled in off-field controversy. The argument will be that the punishment of Watson is not proportional to the punishment of those owners, especially in light of this key line from the Personal Conduct Policy: “Ownership and club or league management have traditionally been held to a higher standard and will be subject to more significant discipline when violations of the Personal Conduct Policy occur.”

According to the source, the union’s defense of Deshaun Watson will take specific aim at the league’s handling of Commanders owner Daniel Snyder, Patriots owner Robert Kraft, and Cowboys owner Jerry Jones.

As to Snyder, the union will argue that his punishment in light of the findings and potential recommendations of attorney Beth Wilkinson was weak and not fully enforced. As to Kraft, the union will argue that Kraft received no punishment despite allegedly receiving a massage became a sexual encounter. (Although Kraft was charged with solicitation, the case was dismissed based on the fact that the video surveillance utilized by law enforcement violated the rights of the various persons who were secretly recorded.) As to Jones, the union will argue that the league failed to investigate the voyeurism scandal involving former Cowboys P.R. chief Rich Dalrymple, including but not limited to the key questions of what Jones knew, when he knew it, and whether he knew that Dalrymple was secretly recording multiple cheerleaders while they changed their clothes.

The union believes that these arguments will be more likely to find traction than in the past, given the adoption in 2020 of a new, independent process for assessing potential Personal Conduct Policy violations committed by players. With Commissioner Roger Goodell or his designee no longer presiding over the effort to evaluate the evidence and reach a decision, the Disciplinary Officer ( retired federal judge Sue L. Robinson) could decide to allow the union to fully explore the manner in which the league handled Snyder, Kraft, and Jones.

The union, for example, could get access to evidence from Wilkinson’s investigation, the league’s handling of the information, and the key question of what Wilkinson would have recommended, if the league had bothered to ask her for a recommendation. (As previously reported, she would have recommended that Snyder be forced to sell.) The union also could get access to internal communications regarding whether Kraft should be disciplined, and whether Jones and the Cowboys should be investigated.

This approach would be separate from defending Watson against any claim of wrongdoing. It would be based on whether, even if he violated the policy with a habit of arranging private massages and trying to make those massages become sexual encounters, any punishment of Watson must be justified by the punishment imposed on Snyder, the non-punishment imposed on Kraft, and the lack of even an investigation of Jones.

Whether and to what extent this defense will hold any real water — and will gather any real evidence — will depend on Judge Robinson, who was jointly hired by the league and the union. But if the league means what it says when it says that owners are held to a higher standard and will be subject to more significant discipline for violations of the Personal Conduct Policy, the manner in which Snyder, Kraft, and Jones were handled by the league becomes directly relevant to the manner in which Watson is handled, too.

41 responses to “NFLPA’s defense of Deshaun Watson will take aim at NFL’s treatment of multiple owners

  1. Hard to comprehend the players union and players in general stand behind Watson. They sure did not stand up for some in the past one for sure Big Ben, not arrested, no grand jury , what two girls and one even came out in Vegas was a set up. The league went after Ben in a few weeks. Watson has run free for what two years and some team hired him for millions as if his actions was normal for the NFL.

  2. This might work. The last thing the NFL wants is any of the Wilkinson report’s information to become public.

  3. 26 Plaintiffs, all with similar stories and allegations of sexual misconduct. The NFL needs to drop the hammer on Deshaun Watson, and soon. He has absolutely no business being in an NFL uniform right now representing ANY organization or the league itself.

  4. Hear that Browns management? Unprecedented punishment…. Ring, Ring…..”Hey Baker, we know we dumped all over you to get Watson, but ya know, you’re still under contract. Cya Monday? ” Bahahahahaha

  5. If a person pays union dues, the union is obligated to defend them.

    No matter how despicable the charges. So,the union has no choice.

  6. BREAKING NEWS: The people at the top aren’t treated the same as everyone else!

  7. “Whatever the specific penalty, the union will mobilize to defend Watson, as it is required to do by the federal duty of fair representation.”
    This ls why the union is defending Watson, not because they are amoral, but because they seek to level the playing field between owners and players.

  8. Stuff like this makes me appreciate the USFL even more 😀 , really enjoy these guys just playing with heart and pride. Screw the million dollar baby’s.

  9. Something is fishy about the Watson situation Two grand juries couldn’t find any crimes were committed yet he has 24+ civil lawsuits mounting against him and him alone when it’s extremely common for players all over the league to hire masseuses. I’m not saying Watson’s a saint or innocent, but something about all of this just doesn’t smell right.

  10. Union has a duty to defend Watson. They have no choice.

    Whether they an drag information from separate owner incidents onto public view is an interesting strategy.

    Of the three, I would think the Kraft incident is a viable comparison and Mr. Kraft should feel a little warm in his chair.

    Still find it amazing that Kraft or Watson didn’t just bust a jet to Vegas when they felt the urge. It’s all legal there.

    Fun times.

  11. The league doesn’t mean what it says. We know this. Watson is going to be crushed.

  12. I mean I get the “language” of what the NFLPA is supposed to do merits they defend their players…but they should definitely “misplace” this Dashaun Watson guy from their system and shrug their shoulders.

  13. I am just here for the clowns who think Baker will ever take a snap for the Browns again.

  14. patriots123456 says:
    June 16, 2022 at 11:19 am
    If a person pays union dues, the union is obligated to defend them.

    No matter how despicable the charges. So,the union has no choice.

    __________________________________________

    You hit the nail on the head. The union has to defend Watson, even if they don’t want to.

  15. It’s funny how everyone keeps saying that “Baker is under contract so he has to play if Watson is suspended “ When Watson was under contract last season and didn’t have to play. Football is hard enough when the QB is 100% committed and engaged. No team is going to play a QB that hates the team and wants out. Mayfield will never play another snap for Cleveland!

  16. The decision will be made when people decide that since NFL sponsors and the networks will be fully supporting Watson and what he did if he plays that maybe papa johns, or pizza hut are a much better choice than little ceasars, et al.

  17. This is the Union’s job. And in all honesty, they have to do it even though Watson is a scum bag.

    But that said, I do think there’s something for their case… Snyder and Jones for certain, and the former Panther’s owner was another one not mentioned in here. Kraft is certainly a comparable as well. The problem is the double standard.

    The NFL should go hard after Watson. They also should have gone hard after these owners too and didn’t.

    If you’re going to have standards, there needs to not be one set for the owners and other for the players.

  18. I think it is time for the NFL to hire an independent HR firm to cleanup team offices and handle disciplinary actions.

  19. sbc2556 says:

    June 16, 2022 at 11:28 am

    Something is fishy about the Watson situation Two grand juries couldn’t find any crimes were committed yet he has 24+ civil lawsuits mounting against him and him alone when it’s extremely common for players all over the league to hire masseuses. I’m not saying Watson’s a saint or innocent, but something about all of this just doesn’t smell right.
    ————————-
    Yea we now know the grand jury was dealt a stacked deck…. the fix was in from the get go.
    Hardin did his job and kept DW out of jail. The rest is just money and games missed.

  20. this is a crazy rabbit hole. Snyder should not be brought up, but kraft and jerruh have some similarities, just not to the extent of watson. kraft got in trouble for 1 instance and not much was found out in dallas. watson is different due to the sheer number and scope of what he continually (allegedly) did. the league has gone after other guys hardeer and faster then watson and this really raises questions. WHY? Why are they dragging their feet on this and basically staying out of it for so long, can it be because the league had been pushing watson to be a face of the league(even though he has not earned it on the field and definitely not off it)?? Can it be due to other factors relating to events from a few summers back and the league is afraid of backlash? justice is supposed to be blind, blind to all factors not just some and what is not being talked about and is just as disgusting as the alleged actions were but how pooerly the DA handled the grand jury, not letting the investigating officers speak and only 2-3 of the ladies speak to the grand jury. People should be outraged about that as well.

  21. While I do believe that the owners mentioned got off way too easy, I want to know what this “unprecedented punishment” is that the NFL has lined up for Deshaun Watson. Lifetime ban? One thing is for certain: this is not going away, and Watson could have squashed it when he had the chance. He needs to pray that the NFLPA helps him out. His options are shrinking.

  22. The union is defending Watson (and rightfully so) from capricious and arbitrary punishment from the league. They aren’t defending what he did. Only defending against Goodell handing down unprecedented punishment.

  23. sbc2556 says:
    June 16, 2022 at 11:28 am
    Something is fishy about the Watson situation Two grand juries couldn’t find any crimes were committed yet he has 24+ civil lawsuits mounting against him and him alone when it’s extremely common for players all over the league to hire masseuses. I’m not saying Watson’s a saint or innocent, but something about all of this just doesn’t smell right.
    ——————
    Simply, no jury would ever indict somebody based on he said\she said. Civil cases don’t have the same burden of proof.

  24. If they are successful it will be the classic example of losing by winning. People can pverlook somethings but the magnitude of Watson’s actions dwarfs all the owners actions combined. The players association has an obligation to defend him, but to the extent they are successful they lose.

  25. If the NFLPA was competently lead they would not want to loudly back Watson.
    Instead they would privately discuss other issues with Goodell that impact lots of players. Maybe minor PED violations, or pot smoking. Or preventing what the Browns did with OBJ, circumventing the CBA is buying down his release.

  26. Any reasonable person must admit he did SOMETHING wrong, even if we don’t know exactly what. I say give him 8 games, no pay. Call it a day.

  27. This isnt a hill the players assoc wants to die on. If they go scorched earth to orotect this predator, expect the NFL to cease to exist

  28. I don’t understand…. Couldn’t ANY & ALL of the women masseuses just stopped if the situation became uncomfortable for them & just leave? Aren’t some of them REPEAT service givers? Did he not pay them for services rendered? Did ANY of them file criminal charges due to what transpired? I’m not saying Watson is innocent in all of this as his constant search for different masseuses is very odd in itself especially when he has already admitted to some leading to consensual sex….it sounds to me like he engaged in all these massages in an attempt to achieve that goal, so it does seem rather predatory on his part …. But what happens between two consenting adults behind closed doors is not a crime, or civil violation for that matter unless he didn’t stop if/when they asked him to….

  29. Is it possible that the NFLPA could argue that Watson was already punished because he was put on ice sat year? He spent the whole year out of the game and although this was not league mandated it could be argued that the league should have stepped in to let him play.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.