USFL changes rule to prevent tanking, winner of Panthers-Maulers gets first draft pick

USFL Week Three - Pittsburgh Maulers v Michigan Panthers
Getty Images

With Dolphins coach Brian Flores’ allegation that Dolphins owner Stephen Ross wanted him to lose games intentionally for better draft picks, the subject of tanking has gained renewed scrutiny in the NFL. But another professional football league has decided to take a simple step to prevent tanking at the end of its season.

The USFL changed its rules this week so that the team with the worst record will no longer get the first overall pick in the draft. Instead, it will be the winner of Sunday’s game between the two worst teams in the league — the Michigan Panthers and Pittsburgh Maulers — who gets the first pick in the 2023 USFL draft.

USFL Executive Vice President of Football Operations Daryl Johnston explained that the rule change was put into place this week to ensure that both the Panthers and Maulers were playing to win.

“We’ve got an unusual situation in our final week of the regular season in the USFL. The 1-8 Michigan Panthers are playing the 1-8 Pittsburgh Maulers. Under normal circumstances, the loser of this game would be awarded the first draft pick in the upcoming draft. But we’re going to change the rules right here, so this weekend whoever wins the game actually gets not only the first pick in the 2023 draft but the first pick in every round of the 2023 draft,” Johnston said. “Making sure there’s no shenanigans going on.”

Of course, no one even knows yet whether there will be a 2023 USFL draft because the USFL may not even stay in business into 2023. So this is as much a marketing ploy to get people to watch the USFL this weekend as it is a real attempt at ensuring competitive integrity.

Still, the NFL should take notes: Incentivizing losing at the end of the season results in a lot of bad football games being played between two teams that are already out of playoff contention. If the NFL instead changed its draft order so that the non-playoff team that won the most games after being mathematically eliminated from the playoffs got the first overall pick, late-season games between losing teams would be a lot more meaningful, and a lot more exciting to watch. The USFL may be on to something.

28 responses to “USFL changes rule to prevent tanking, winner of Panthers-Maulers gets first draft pick

  1. Good concept but it would need refining. This year one of the AFC West teams may not make the playoffs. They would be far more likely to win more games than the truly bad teams in the NFL and getting a higher draft slot in each round should just make them much stronger in the following years.

    It should be limited to the worst 6-8 teams rather than all non-playoff teams.

  2. How about this for the NFL? You don’t know know the draft order in advance. We pick it last second. For each round, the worst team gets 32 balls/tickets/chances. The next worst team 31. Etc. Best team gets one. Then we pick. Next on the clock is….

  3. I like it but it’s hard to project that the two worst teams will play each other the last week of every season.

  4. If you keep it small – say four teams – then a post season play-off for the number one pick between, say, the two worst teams in each conference would work. Play the final for the #1 pick in the week between the Championship games and the Superbowl. It’d end tanking for a specific pick, while still ensuring that the worst teams still get quite high picks to maintain the ideal of the draft that the worst teams get to pick the best players in order that they get better.

  5. snowbdr says:
    June 18, 2022 at 12:51 pm
    Good concept but it would need refining. This year one of the AFC West teams may not make the playoffs.

    _____________________________

    But the AFCW team won’t be eliminated until much later in the season so they won’t have much opportunity to accumulate Ws. I like the concept…. unless crap teams start tanking the 1st half of the season…. but it would still generate interest in crap teams late in the season.

  6. Good concept but it would need refining. This year one of the AFC West teams may not make the playoffs.

    _____________________________

    But the AFCW team won’t be eliminated until much later in the season so they won’t have much opportunity to accumulate Ws. I like the concept…. unless crap teams start tanking the 1st half of the season…. but it would still generate interest in crap teams late in the season.

    ———————————————————————————————-Someone has to win the AFC West. The winner of the division gets in the playoffs. So that wouldn’t happen.

  7. Would be pretty fun if they had a playoff bracket regarding the #1 pick. While the playoffs are occurring, you have another playoff format, maybe just 4 teams, competing for that #1 draft spot.

  8. I say put all 32 owners in a stadium for combat with wet pool noodles. The last man standing gets the first-round pick. This would be a lot more fun to watch than the ProBowl.

  9. Little league teams do this all the time. They want to make sure the can draft the best 9 year old out there.

  10. The coaches would play to win that game and get the first pick in the draft. Be hard for certain players when the prize for winning is getting a guy that costs you your job.

  11. I love it! Not sure what the best option is; but, the NFL’s system is broken.

  12. At first thought, I quite liked the idea of a “draft playoff” with a handful of the worst teams competing for the top spots.

    But as I thought about it, it doesn’t seem fair to give the worst teams the agency to win the top spot when teams with much better records have no such chance. It would still incentivize losing, just in a different way.

    I think some kind of lottery is most fair, if maybe not the best way to achieve parity. Just as I believe the risks of overtime are (or were, before the latest rule change) a fair “punishment” for not winning in regulation, not having control over one’s draft destiny seems a fair thing for the worst teams.

  13. Lotteries are BS and there’s nothing fair about them, it’s sheer dumb luck. This idea of the first pick to the winner is brilliant. Totally incentive driven. Stop for a moment and think about the number of times a Super Bowl Champion has repeated as Champion…? The rich won’t get richer but the losers may play a little bit harder. This is a win-win. Great Idea.

  14. None of these ideas to fix the top of the draft are great. The draft generally works so doesn’t need to be fixed with something else that isn’t a clear and definite improvement. Tanking for the top pick is not the sure fire thing many seem to claim. Absolutely certain top picks are relatively rare and even when a certain prospect is a great player it still doesn’t guarantee success – see Luck, Andrew.

  15. Just let the Jags have the first pick every year. They never get it right anyway.

  16. What’s the difference anyway? They won’t get anyone in the top 100. All the good players will go to the NFL. No drama here. In fact, I haven’t watched one minute of the USFL, and I don’t plan to.

  17. Gotta say that on the surface that looks like a really good rule and MDS’s thought on the NFL doing something similar is very compelling. Not sure how it would look in reality but it’s definitely worth exploring. Try it one season and tweak it if necessary.

    The only downside I can see is if you have a truly bad team (think Browns a few years ago) it doesn’t help create parity if they are picking 2nd or 3rd every round instead of first. And think of the loss of trade capital. Other teams are going to give up a heck of a lot more draft picks/players for the number 1 pick than they would for the number 3 pick (unless of course they are the 49ers).

  18. This is simple. Draft Lotto amongst the non playoff teams. This is the one thing the NBA has right. And what a made for TV event that would be.

  19. I think draft order should be decided as it always has been by record, but it should be done after each team has played 13 games. Worst team gets 1st pick. Then build some kind of incentive for extra picks based on win total of their final games. That could be a lottery amoung the teams with the most wins in the final games.

  20. Draft Lottery. That’s the fix. Simple. If you want to encourage teams to not tank, reverse the odds for the bottom five. Best odds go to the fifth worst team. That way the worst teams still get the best chance to improve through the draft, but no one’s trying to finish last.

  21. Love it completely agree, it would lift up the latter part of the season greatly. The worst teams probably shouldn’t simply be awarded the #1 pick for sucking anyway. Let them figure out another way to improve if need be.

  22. I’m okay with that and the NFL must address the top teams who rest their starters during the last game. Every team should have to risk their top players through at least three quarters in each game. Teams who take advantage of that should have their seeding changed. A number one becomes the last place team and every team moves up in the ranking.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.