Bears say their focus is on a new stadium in the suburbs, not a roof on Soldier Field

US-NEWS-ENCLOSING-SOLDIER-FIELD-AND-SELLING-1-TB
Getty Images

Chicago officials are talking about putting a roof on Soldier Field in an effort to persuade the Bears not to move, but the Bears don’t sound interested.

The Bears, who have agreed to buy a stadium-sized piece of land in the suburb of Arlington Heights, released a statement saying the idea of a domed Soldier Field isn’t part of their focus.

“The only potential project the Chicago Bears are exploring for a new stadium development is Arlington Park. As part of our mutual agreement with the seller of that property, we are not pursuing alternative stadium deals or sites, including renovations to Soldier Field, while we are under contract,” the team said.

Chicago’s plans to renovate Soldier Field and the area around it are about a lot more than just the Bears, and the city would like to see Soldier Field get more use around the year, and not just during football season. It soon may not get any use from the Bears, who seem ready to leave the city.

22 responses to “Bears say their focus is on a new stadium in the suburbs, not a roof on Soldier Field

  1. That’s ok. I’m sure the Chicago Fire will generate as much revenue as the Bears when the stadium becomes soccer only, right?

  2. If the Bears decide to relocate, I hope Chicago will step in and refuse to let them take the Chicago part of their name with them. “Arlington Bears” does not have the same zing and they would no longer be of Chicago..

  3. ……. If the Bears relocate, they will no longer be the Monster of the Midway. Maybe, instead, the Avengers of Arlington.

  4. Hint: No one wants to go to a Super Bowl in the Illinois suburbs. The suburbs blow.

    Absolutely ridiculous if that’s the obsessive and stupid goal here by the deadbeat McCaskeys.

    Just sell the team already. You are total failures.

    You literally have some of the best sightlines of any stadium in football and a classic on the lake location right downtown in one of America’s great party cities. Just fantastic.

    Why would you want to throw what away for Schaumburg or whatever other horrible sprawl situation in the burbs?

    I cannot imagine 75,000 people descending upon an already awful sprawl situation in the burbs. What a nightmare idea.

  5. The Bears are looking at their own stadium. They can gain significant revenue from concessions, parking, entertainment venues around the outside of the stadium that operate everyday,.. restaurants, sports bars, office buildings, maybe condos or apartments. There are so many ways to build revenue other than TV Revenue sharing. Soldier Field can’t give them that.

  6. I would hope their first area of focus is fixing the team because Da Bears need a lot of work after the Pace/Nagy debacle. After that, then yeah, Arlington.

  7. Really not quite sure why this is news. There was no doubt what the Bears plans were when the announcement of the purchase of Arlington Park was made.

    In spite of Chicago’s efforts to find a way to lure the Bears to stay, it was/is never going to happen.

    Even though for legal reasons I suppose since there is still a ways to go finalizing the sale the Bears have been relatively quiet on the subject, I am sure it has been “full speed ahead” all along the way towards the end goal of a new stadium on the purchased property and nothing Chicago offers is going to change that.

  8. “The Bears are looking at their own stadium. They can gain significant revenue from concessions, parking, entertainment venues around the outside of the stadium that operate everyday,.. restaurants, sports bars, office buildings, maybe condos or apartments. There are so many ways to build revenue other than TV Revenue sharing. Soldier Field can’t give them that.”

    Ooh…revenue! How exciting!

  9. The Bears best option would be moving to Gary, Indiana and into a new stadium right off the I-80/94. The Gary Indiana Bears flows off the tongue. Plus it would be closer to downtown Chicago than Arlington Heights or whatever Illinois suburb they are looking at

  10. touchback6 says:
    July 8, 2022 at 12:51 pm
    You literally have some of the best sightlines of any stadium in football and a classic on the lake location right downtown in one of America’s great party cities.
    ______________

    Soldier Field is definitely not “right downtown”. It is at least 1.7 miles out Lakeshore Drive from downtown.

    Soldier Field may have decent sightlines, but the interior is dilapidated to the point of being run down. It also way too old to renovate. A new, modern stadium is not only the best alternative, it is the only alternative.

  11. Virginia McCaskey is 99 years old. Nothing is happening until she passes. The deal with Arlington is a hedge in case the heirs need to sell after her death. A new billionaire owner may want to build a stadium in Arlington Heights to maximize revenues. That billionaire can also choose to re-initiate negotiations with the city for an indoor mega plex that would include a football stadium and conference center (McDome). Any conversations or news items on this subject before Virginia dies are just noise.

  12. The Bears absolutely need a retractable roof with expanded seating. Soldier Field is iconic. But it is not a modern, fan friendly experience.

  13. I guess I can’t blame the Bears for not wanting to be in the city itself either.

  14. Sticking a roof on Soldier Field would be pure idiocy. The renovations of the 2002-2003 period took a historic but obsolete venue and spent over $600 million to produce what looks like a 1970s airport terminal that crashed into an old Division II college stadium. A roof? More like an awning over a dumpster fire. If the Bears move to the suburbs, an NFL-caliber facility wouldn’t be viable, as there wouldn’t be enough events for it to host. Part of the sad, gradual Detroitification of Chicago.

  15. As a long time Washington fan who now lives in Chicago, I just sadly shook my head at this news. When WAS left DC for the Maryland suburbs, everything changed. It was less exciting, less of a shared experience of history and tradition. It became sterilized. They’re going to move the team regardless but they won’t really be Da Bears any longer.

  16. thurmanmerman99 says:
    July 8, 2022 at 1:52 pm
    The Bears best option would be moving to Gary, Indiana and into a new stadium right off the I-80/94. The Gary Indiana Bears flows off the tongue. Plus it would be closer to downtown Chicago than Arlington Heights or whatever Illinois suburb they are looking at
    —————————–

    its a difference of 6 miles and Gary is an absolute DUMP of a town.

  17. too funny seeing people complain about this. Arlington Park site is right off 53 which turns into 290 and 355. Getting into the city for games is a joke, parking is a joke but then lets look at the stadium. That field is AWFUL. Get on board this new stadium is going to be fantastic. For those saying “oh but they wont be Chicago” what is it like half of professional sports teams don’t play in the actual city limits they’re named after

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.