Report: Google has made a bid for Sunday Ticket

UKRAINE-RUSSIA-MEDIA-YOUTUBE-INTERNET-CONFLICT
Getty Images

As the football-watching worlds watches and waits for news as to where it will be watching Sunday Ticket in 2023, a new contender for the package has emerged.

According to the New York Times, Google has made a bid for the out-of-market service. The games would be streamed through YouTube, which is owned by Google.

Other bidders include Apple, Amazon, and Disney.

NFL media executive Brian Rolapp told the Times that the league expects to finalize a Sunday Ticket arrangement for 2023 and beyond “in the coming months.”

“A number of companies are in strong position to potentially land Sunday Ticket, but we still have a ways to go in this process,” Rolapp told the Times in a written statement.

The league is hoping to get more than $2.5 billion per year for Sunday Ticket. One report pegged the number as high as $3 billion. Others have suggested that maybe the talks aren’t going well; otherwise, a deal would be done by now.

The Times pins the delay on the league’s ongoing interest in dumping other properties into the transaction, including a piece of NFL Network, the RedZone channel, and NFL+, the league’s new subscription service.

Apple, per the Times, remains the perceived frontrunner. CEO Tim Cook has met with league officials, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, and Patriots owner Robert Kraft regarding Sunday Ticket. The Times writes that Apple “has made winning the package a priority.”

Many would say that any company having the rights other than DirecTV will be a win. That’s the only thing that’s known at this point; after 2022, DirecTV is out. At some point during the 2022 season, we’ll find out who will be in come 2023.

53 responses to “Report: Google has made a bid for Sunday Ticket

  1. I can’t wait for directv to disappear from the face of the earth. Worst company ever

  2. Actually DirecTv was pretty good, that is until ATT bought it. Then, wow what a nightmare.

  3. Directv was great before AT&T but it still wasn’t bad afterward. I never had service disruptions and only rarely was there some kinda glitch. I’m very wary of this being streamed and having to rely on the internets to have a clear, crisp picture for live sports. Will we be able to pause it, rewind it? Record it?

  4. I had Direct TV and it was fine. The stories are true we had 3 feet of snow in Fairfield Ohio and it worked all though the snow storm.

  5. Undoubtedly the Google involvement was leaked by the NFL to create a bidding war – a process these companies have dealt with a thousand times given their history with mergers and acquisitions – seems like an amateurish move by the NFL.

  6. I’m sure if Google does win the bid for Sunday Ticket it will be to force viewers to subscribe to their YouTube TV subscription service and not on regular YouTube.

  7. Google and You Tube bring it on. Doesn’t get any more user friendly than that.

  8. if Google does win the bid for Sunday Ticket it will be to force viewers to subscribe to their YouTube TV subscription service

    Of course they will. where do think the $ will come from?

  9. So now we pay 65$ for YouTube TV + the price for nfl Sunday ticket?
    Doesn’t sound very appealing

  10. Sounds like the Sunday Ticket we know is going to get blown up. Every product has its life cycle and I can guarantee you with the bundling they’re talking about here whatever emerges is not going to be what it was.

  11. I had Direct TV years before it was acquired by AT&T.
    The only difference I noticed afterwards was that my bills physically looked different.
    It went up a few bucks, yes, but nothing else changed. Nothing else changed. Have never had a service or equipment issue. I don’t know where everyone else is coming up with all their “horror stories”.
    Seems to me if it was as bad as being made out here, then they would have gone out of business years ago.

  12. Makes sense that Apple is seeking to go all in here. Their bread and butter, the iPhone, is slowly drying up. Amazon would be better suited since they’ve already secured Thursday night and better positioned to incentivize potential customers with deals through Amazon Prime. You can hate Amazon all you want, but when they can literally bring a product to your doorstep for the same price (if not lower) versus the traditional store… well, that consumer decision is a no-brainer then…

  13. Lots of questions; We will be able to Pause, Rewind or Record games? Will Bars, Restaurants, Sportbooks, etc be able to show all the games? Cost? Those who are Glad to see Directv loss this package, be careful what you wish for. A lot still has to be worked out.

  14. chicagopacker says:
    July 24, 2022 at 4:09 pm
    Makes sense that Apple is seeking to go all in here. Their bread and butter, the iPhone, is slowly drying up

    ——-

    In what universe is the iPhone “drying up”?

  15. The NFL playing the “unnamed sources” game familiar to agents trying to drum up interest in a player before FA.

    If they really wanted to make news, they’d announce the new owner of the Sunday Ticket is going to sell it on a team by team basis.

    And they’d get rid of that fake agreement with the networks that forces the new owner to keep the price sky high to keep it from competing with the networks.EXCEPT, local games are already blacked out on the Sunday Ticket…..

  16. Makes sense that Apple is seeking to go all in here. Their bread and butter, the iPhone, is slowly drying up.

    ———-//————//——-

    Sorry dude. The computer has been Apple’s “bread & butter” since 1984. A little thing called the Macintosh.

  17. DirecTV NFL Sunday ticket streaming is not that bad. I am pretty sure that as part of the package they will need to subcontact with either DTV or DISH to still offer satellite to bars. Streaming in a bar is pretty much a no go and bars are a significant portion of the Sunday Ticket revenue stream.

  18. At least google can deliver on the speed. Not so for Amazon and Apple. Just use your favorite search engine and do a search on Amazon Prime Video problems. Half the viewers can’t use it because of buffering and synching problems. Netflix, youtube, Disney and even Apple figured it out. Not Amazon. And they don’t care.

  19. I have YouTube TV and still would not pay extra for the NFL Ticket.

  20. tincada1 says:
    July 24, 2022 at 12:40 pm
    if Google does win the bid for Sunday Ticket it will be to force viewers to subscribe to their YouTube TV subscription service

    Of course they will. where do think the $ will come from?
    ///////
    That’s kind of how capitalism works. I don’t get why anybody thinks they deserve to watch the nfl for free. And no, subsidizing stadiums isn’t a reason. Cities subsidize businesses all the time so they can collect taxes and have a thriving market with jobs.

  21. nhpats2011 says:
    July 24, 2022 at 4:18 pm
    chicagopacker says:
    July 24, 2022 at 4:09 pm
    Makes sense that Apple is seeking to go all in here. Their bread and butter, the iPhone, is slowly drying up

    ——-

    In what universe is the iPhone “drying up”?
    ———
    iPhone continues to dominate and their services business alone is more than $20B. At a quarterly revenue of $97b they are not hurting if they don’t get NFL for $3b. It’s chump change. Just an add on for Apple TV offering.

  22. I’m fine with whatever platform wins the rights. Just allow a la carte game/team packages, please.

  23. Ken S says:
    July 24, 2022 at 11:11 am
    Actually DirecTv was pretty good, that is until ATT bought it. Then, wow what a nightmare.

    Honestly? This is the truth. Directv went straight down the tubes after AT&T bought them out. AT&T is absolute garbage. I’ve had Directv for approximately 20 – 25 years and I can say that the product, and the Sunday Ticket itself, is/was good. The primary fault of Directv is that their customer service is nothing short of the absolute pits.

  24. nhpats2011 says:
    July 24, 2022 at 4:18 pm
    chicagopacker says:
    July 24, 2022 at 4:09 pm
    Makes sense that Apple is seeking to go all in here. Their bread and butter, the iPhone, is slowly drying up

    ——-

    In what universe is the iPhone “drying up”?

    ———

    The universe where apple has a small percentage of phone users worldwide compared to android devices?

  25. Pretty soon,you won’t be able to watch the NFL unless you are paying for streaming services. Games on cable will be obsolete at this rate.

  26. I have YouTube TV and I am very happy with it. I bought the kit (hardware that plugs into your TV) with the little white remote. I like it better than using your phone to navigate. I’ve never had any streaming issues. You can pause and it has unlimited storage. The only thing I don’t like is that it doesn’t have a “back” button or capability to jump back to a previously viewed channel.

  27. marthisdil says:
    July 24, 2022 at 6:11 pm
    nhpats2011 says:
    July 24, 2022 at 4:18 pm
    chicagopacker says:
    July 24, 2022 at 4:09 pm
    Makes sense that Apple is seeking to go all in here. Their bread and butter, the iPhone, is slowly drying up

    ——-

    In what universe is the iPhone “drying up”?

    ———

    The universe where apple has a small percentage of phone users worldwide compared to android devices?

    ———-

    Where is that world….because it’s not here….

  28. Like so many, I never had a problem with Directv, always great picture and service people. But when ATT bought it and unluckily for me I had to contact them I was passed around to at least 3 different countries and 5 different ‘customer service’ people. Finally got one who got me the correct phone number to call by, guess what, googling it. ATT screwed it up and their online interface is horrible. One of the worst ever.

  29. tiredofcowards says:
    July 24, 2022 at 11:38 am
    Directv was great before AT&T but it still wasn’t bad afterward. I never had service disruptions and only rarely was there some kinda glitch. I’m very wary of this being streamed and having to rely on the internets to have a clear, crisp picture for live sports. Will we be able to pause it, rewind it? Record it?

    15134Rate This

    I’m sure it will be. I’ve got YouTube TV and it has a full DVR just like DirecTV has. It would never sell without it. And yes my sports are HD and perfectly clear. I’ve been streaming TV for about 4 years after DirecTV. It’s the only way to go.

  30. I had Sunday Ticket with Thompson-Hughes Satellite service the very first year they had the full season available on satellite (1995). I moved in 2003 and the wife thought she needed to cancel and restart service at the new location. Upon restart, I was told I’d be paying twice my normal rate because “technically, we cancelled,” when we should have asked to “move service.” No amount of reasoning with them changed that. I told them she simply did not understand “the process” but clearly we were “moving,” which is why we called to set up new receivers and dish. They did not care. I forget who owned it at that time, but there was no way I was submitting to this kind of treatment, especially as an original purchaser of their new product. I’ve never paid a dime since. As far as the companies bidding for this, I wouldn’t trust any of them.

  31. So now we pay 65$ for YouTube TV + the price for nfl Sunday ticket?
    Doesn’t sound very appealing

    ————————————————————————————————

    You’re going to pay extra for Sunday Ticket no matter what your current service is. I gave up on Sunday Ticket years ago when I realized that I wasn’t watching much more than our local team. They usually played at 1pm and there were only a few games on at 4. At least 2 of which I could get on national networks anyway. With more and more games being played on Sunday night, Monday night and Thursday nights, it just wasn’t worth the money to be able to see a handful of games.

  32. now that the chiefs are good they get about 5-7 nationally televised games…
    .
    if there’s anything else i need to see, I’ll catch it at a pub or brewery.

  33. I have had the Sunday Ticket from day 1,and moved a few times and never had any trouble. Google/Youtube will ruin a great thing.

  34. No, Apple’ bread and butter is NOT Macintosh. More than 50% of Apple revenue is iPhone. And NO, Apple heavily dominates the market in the US and especially high end market where there is big profit margin. So, NO NFL deal is not a huge deal for Apple.

  35. No, Apple’ bread and butter is NOT Macintosh. More than 50% of Apple revenue is iPhone.

    ———-/———/———

    Apple was founded on, and has been selling computers since the late 1970’s.
    The first iPhone was sold in 2007.
    I think Apple was firmly established as a computer company long before they sold their first phone. We can argue about what constitutes “bread & butter” , and quibble about sales percentages, but they were in the computer business long before they were selling anything else.

  36. Oh great. Google wins the bid and sometime during the 2025 season their AI intercepts my game choice of Packers vs. Bears, and chimes in with “No. You really want to be watching Cowboys. Everybody else is watching the Cowboys. You should be watching them, too. They are playing Jacksonville!.”

  37. mackcarrington says:
    July 24, 2022 at 8:27 pm
    No, Apple’ bread and butter is NOT Macintosh. More than 50% of Apple revenue is iPhone.

    ———-/———/———

    Apple was founded on, and has been selling computers since the late 1970’s.
    The first iPhone was sold in 2007.
    I think Apple was firmly established as a computer company long before they sold their first phone. We can argue about what constitutes “bread & butter” , and quibble about sales percentages, but they were in the computer business long before they were selling anything else.
    ————–
    Yes, Apple started with the Mac but it’s no longer a Mac company (although Mac sells very well). The literal meaning of “bread & butter” is someone’s livelihood. With that definition, Apple is not a Mac company. It’s an iPhone company. So, I’m not quibbling. To call Apple a Mac company is the same as calling IBM a mainframe company. No longer true. Someone starting in business for something and then changing/pivoting to another area means they are no longer the original company.

  38. KnowsMoreThanYou says:
    July 24, 2022 at 5:28 pm
    tincada1 says:
    July 24, 2022 at 12:40 pm
    if Google does win the bid for Sunday Ticket it will be to force viewers to subscribe to their YouTube TV subscription service

    Of course they will. where do think the $ will come from?
    ///////
    That’s kind of how capitalism works. I don’t get why anybody thinks they deserve to watch the nfl for free. And no, subsidizing stadiums isn’t a reason. Cities subsidize businesses all the time so they can collect taxes and have a thriving market with jobs.

    //////////////////////////////////////////
    You mean that’s how a MONOPLOLY works.

  39. I don’t care what they do, as long as Directv retains the commercial rights for places like Bars and sports books.

    But for all of you hating on Directv, hope you got a good internet connection Now you got to get a Roku, smart tv, fire stick to watch the games, which most people already have.

    Issue here is going to be for the older folks who just want to watch tv, whatever streaming BS Sunday ticket is on, is going to be a major pain in the butt for some of the older folks.

    Then what about the people who don’t have internet or can’t get a good internet connection where they live?

    Yup, I can really see a sports bar with 30 televisions purchasing 30 Apple TV players or trying to run multiple streams for multiple games. What a nightmare this will be for businesses

    Before you start celebrating it’s off Directv, if whoever is paying 3 billion for it, it ain’t gonna be free, and since your not spending $100+ per month, I wouldn’t expect it to be free for new customers either.

  40. Many people I know haven’t had “cable tv” for several years. I thought I was a latecomer switching to Youtube TV a couple years ago, but based on the comments here you’d think this (and “the internet” -which I’ve been on right around 30 years now) is some new-fangled thing. Streaming over the internet in 2022 is not any less reliable than rabbit ears or cable boxes or whatever else you can use.

  41. Thankfully there are other options now. I am not enjoying the NFL like I use to anyway.

  42. mackcarrington says:
    July 24, 2022 at 8:27 pm
    No, Apple’ bread and butter is NOT Macintosh. More than 50% of Apple revenue is iPhone.

    ———-/———/———

    Apple was founded on, and has been selling computers since the late 1970’s.
    The first iPhone was sold in 2007.
    I think Apple was firmly established as a computer company long before they sold their first phone. We can argue about what constitutes “bread & butter” , and quibble about sales percentages, but they were in the computer business long before they were selling anything else.

    ——

    Their “Bread and butter” is where they earn the majority of their revenue. Today, that’s iPhones and iPads

  43. It really doesn’t matter all that much who wins it. They’re going to charge a lot for it, because they’ll need to raise the $2.5-3.0 billion per year to pay for it. Other things that are guaranteed:

    1. You’re going to need the Internet to watch it. Google, Apple, and Amazon don’t have the broadcast infrastructure to deliver it over regular TV. Disney owns ABC, so they can actually broadcast it easier than the other 3.

    2. You’re going to have to subscribe to their premium service to get it. But NFL Sunday ticket will be an added cost, just like it is on DirecTV.

    3. All 4 services have strong internet presence and infrastructures to handle the load. That said, YouTube has been doing it the longest and has the most viewers by far of any of the other services. YouTube has over 2 billion active viewers around the world, while the other 3 combined have less that 500 million.

    All of that said, I used to work for Google and I doubt their commitment to the deal is going to be as strong as the other 3 competitors. Traditionally, it’s not the kind of thing they’re interested in that much.

  44. In what universe is the iPhone “drying up”?

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Apple has always been hype and sold to exactly the same type and group of customers. In reality as far as operating systems on phones go, Apple is far outsold. By phones alone they are extremely outsold by android system phones. Drying up, doubt it, but truth is the I-phone does not have a huge footprint. Just a cult following amongst those who keep them going. Just adding more cameras and nothing of true new tech will get old to even the true Apple folks eventually. Steve Jobs was Apple. Without him they will devolve over time.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.