The timing of the Stephen Ross announcement can’t be a coincidence

Miami Dolphins v Buffalo Bills
Getty Images

For months, Mary Jo White had been investigating Dolphins owner Stephen Ross. The facts, as to tampering or tanking, weren’t complicated. It shouldn’t have taken as long as it did.

Ultimately, it took just as long as it needed to.

It surely isn’t a coincidence that the NFL announced a suspension of Dolphins owner Stephen Ross for tampering (while somehow exonerating him for tanking) one day after Judge Sue L. Robinson ruled that Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson should be suspended six games for four claims of non-violent sexual assault. Not only does the Ross announcement knock the Watson case out of the headlines, but it also shows that the league can and will (sometimes) impose stiff punishment on owners.

Of course, a six-game suspension for Ross isn’t the same thing as a six-game suspension for a player. While Ross must stay away from the team, he’ll still get six weeks of ticket and TV revenue — amounts that far exceed the $1.5 million fine that was imposed on him by the Commissioner.

That’s one of the many points made in Playmakers, which devotes an entire section to the league’s treatment of owners, in comparison to the league’s treatment of players. Today’s announcement is an obvious effort to show that owners get punished, too.

Speaking of Playmakers, today would be a great day to buy it. A lot of what we do and how we do it has been vindicated by the league’s confirmation of the fact that the Dolphins were indeed trying to land Sean Payton and Tom Brady, reporting which many disregarded and/or ignored. And plenty of what we do and how we do it is documented in the more than 100 essays contained in Playmakers.

14 responses to “The timing of the Stephen Ross announcement can’t be a coincidence

  1. No it’s not a coincidence
    No it’s not fair
    The browns and Texans got no punishment

  2. 1st thing I thought of when I saw this come across the ticker, they had to give him something so they can hand down more to Watson. Funny these two almost ended up with each other.

  3. Owner suspensions are hilarious. “Go home and don’t hang around the building!” Like the nfl would or could possibly know if the owner had contact with the team. If you want to punish an owner, suspending him means nothing. Hit him where it counts. His wallet, the value of the team, or the potential for the teams success. That’s it.

  4. Hit him where it counts. His wallet, the value of the team, or the potential for the teams success. That’s it.

    He was fined 1.5 million (yes, chump change), and also they lose their 1st & 3rd round pick….so they did what you said

  5. Isn’t one of the complaints that Stephen Ross is an absentee owner, choosing to spend his time in New York where he works? So how is being barred from the Dolphins punishment?

  6. So a WR gets suspended for a full year for betting on one game he wasn’t in but an owner who tampers for YEARS gets 6 weeks of “suspension” (yeah, right, whatever that means).

    That “integrity of the game” stuff sure sounds hollow right about now.

  7. BuckyBadger says:
    August 2, 2022 at 3:17 pm

    1st thing I thought of when I saw this come across the ticker, they had to give him something so they can hand down more to Watson. Funny these two almost ended up with each other.

    If Watson had not been so foolish and had simply paid WHATEVER IT COST to settle the civil cases then he WOULD have been a Dolphin. Whomever the lawyer was when Watson was first contacted by Tony Buzbee should NEVER practice law again. This should be a lesson to players. If you are contacted by someone do NOT ridicule them or blow them off no matter whether you are guilty or not. Make a damned counteroffer.

  8. Mark Holland says:
    August 2, 2022 at 3:28 pm

    It really hurt to lose that draft pick

    Don’t you mean those TWO draft picks? They lose a 1st round pick in 2023 and a 3rd round pick in 2024.

  9. “Tampers for years”

    So sensationalistic. Calm the outrage. There were overtures across years, but nothing happened. No players changed teams. No money changed hands.

    People comparing this to Ridley, even that’s a stretch. How was the “integrity of the game” violated here, exactly?

  10. Every single team in the NFL tampers. Always have and the fact there is a rule against it is stupid anyway.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.