Lack of fully-guaranteed contract for Russell Wilson counts as a win for the NFL

Minnesota Vikings v Denver Broncos
Getty Images

A wise man once said, repeatedly on ESPN, “Once is an accident, twice is a trend.” The new Russell Wilson contract suggests that the fully-guaranteed contract given to Brown quarterback Deshaun Watson was the accident, and the absence of full guarantees for veteran quarterback deals will continue to be the trend.

If anyone else was going to be getting a fully-guaranteed deal, it was Wilson. He had the leverage; the Broncos gave up a huge haul of picks to get him. He has the credentials. He went to two Super Bowls, and he’s a nine-time Pro Bowler.  He has the agent, a one-client-only representative who had always driven a very hard bargain. He has a team with unlimited resources, fronted by new Wal-Mart-money owners who can write a check of any size for placement of the future payments in escrow.

But it didn’t happen. The Broncos wouldn’t do it, possibly to ensure that they don’t piss off their new partners less than a month after buying the team. And Wilson, for whatever reason, didn’t push for it. He wasn’t willing, in the end, to pass on the

While the devils of these deals always lurks in the details, it’s out of character for Wilson to commit for so long. Usually, he does a four-year extension with one year left. Now, he’s done a five-year extension with two remaining seasons.

It’s $296 million over seven years, an average of $42.2 million per year from signing. The structure will be critical to understanding this one. Will he get back to the table sooner, or will he be stuck with a contract that could become obsolete, sooner or later between now and 2028 as the cap keeps skyrocket and the market keeps climbing?

We’ll get the full details, and we’ll break them all down. Until then, here’s the takeaway, from a source with extensive knowledge of the contracts negotiated by NFL teams: “I don’t see another fully guaranteed quarterback contract any time soon.”

33 responses to “Lack of fully-guaranteed contract for Russell Wilson counts as a win for the NFL

  1. Only way Browns could land a decent QB was by giving the worst contract in the history of the sport. Other teams shouldn’t fall victim because of their incompetence.

  2. If you think Kirk Cousins is going to go backward from his fully guaranteed money, you’re nuts. He’s the only guy so far that’s got a taste for what that feels like, and I’m guessing it feels pretty damn good.

  3. Also counts as a loss for Lamar Jackson. Watson never should have received a guaranteed contract and this levels the playing field more.

  4. Also w win for the FANS! We cannot continue to support these pampered multi-millionaire players. When they get ‘paid’, our costs go up. There MUST be a breaking point. Let’s apply the same adage to players that blue folks apply to NFL owners, “at some point, you have enough money”. NOW is that point for players.

  5. Broncos need to hope they didn’t extend the Russell from the 2nd halves of the past 3 seasons……………………………..

  6. It would be absolute lunacy to fully guarantee 7 years to a 33 yo player in a physical/violent sport like football. Heck, even baseball with their stupid contracts, wouldn’t likely go that far (Freddie Freeman for 6 at 32-33 is close, we’ll see how that works out). You now the Angels can’t have liked the Pujols deal much in retrospect and the road is littered with guys in mid late 30s still drawing big bucks that can’t hit their weight, etc. 7-$296 for 33 yo guy is crazy enough. The full guarantee thing is way overblown. A player would make way less if fully guaranteed (the dysfunctional Browns aside), so the player is also betting on himself a bit that he can continue to deliver the salary/value to whomever pays it. If they can’t, they should be gone (you don’t pay an employee $300k to do a $75k job, right?

  7. Does the cap really “skyrocket?” Seems like it grows 7% or so per year (COVID drop aside). So it doubles maybe every 10 years at that rate? Even at 9% it doubles only every 8.

  8. Are you serious!? You’re just going to overlook the fact that Russell Wilson at 33 is 7 YEARS OLDER than Watson??? Are you implying age doesn’t matter in these deals? No way ANY ream is going to give a 33 year old QB a long term guaranteed deal, and I’m sure Russ and his team didn’t even demand a fully guaranteed deal.

  9. This is why the Hawks were willing to trade him.

    You can’t pay one guy 25% of your payroll and put together a SB roster.

    Add in that he’s almost 34 years old and no longer has the mobility that once compensated for his height.

  10. Only stupid franchises like Minnesota and Cleveland guarantee their quarterback’s contracts.

  11. BTW, remember when the trade happened and Denver fans postulated that he would take less to put together a winning roster?

    I told you that Russ talks a good game but will want $250M over 5 years and then will blame management for not putting together a winning roster.

    I was close.

  12. If you’ve ever heard Russell Wilson mic’d up, you know he is, arguably, the least interesting person playing in the NFL. Insufferably nothing meaningful to say on the field. His interviews are nearly as vacuous. To add insult to injury, do you remember the little mime, street clothes warm ups he did last year while he was out on the field? What you didn’t see was the camera operator and other players on the field vomiting at this shameless “look at me and my dedication” spotlight grab. It was truly painful. There aren’t many NFL players I truly root against, Russ is one of them.

  13. At what point will one of these players get a tiny sliver of ownership (or even future option) in his contract? Would be great to see that someday, players getting a shot (or a future shot) to impact the league as an owner after having such influence as a player.

  14. What people in football need to understand that they dont: The Browns have been the worst run organization in all of Professiinal Sports over the last 30 years or so. There isnt another franchise in all of professional sports that comes close to matching their 30 year run ( + ) of CHRONIC futility. In order to break thru that ERA it is franchise that MUST Do something DRASTIC to change their fortunes. Would they be able to secure a franchise QB on an open market, Against their competition WITHOUT reaching out to try and make an EXTRAORDINARY change ??? No. In reality, the Browns have indeed been very stupid ( in everything they do) for 30 + years of putrid results. The current regime is actually the 1St bold / smartest one they have had in s very long time that recognizes the need to take some bold risks in order to change the fortunes for their beaten and brutalized fanbase. Do the other teams care for what they did to obtain a proven and potential franchise changing QB? No. But who cares. They need to try bold things to turn that ” Factory of Sadness” around. Long term…… Its frankly, proper, bold, and the right thing for THAT franchise to do. Not the recipe for all franchises…….but THAT franchise needs to do bold ( and Risky…..and perhaps also not very popular) things. IT OWES IT TO THEIR FANS TO TURN THAT PROGRAM AROUND…..SOME HOW. ANY WAY.

  15. dryzzt23 says: “Also w win for the FANS! We cannot continue to support these pampered multi-millionaire players.”
    ——————

    You do know that most of the NFL revenue is from tv broadcast contracts, right? The players EARNED whatever they’re paid as prt of the CBA.

  16. The very first game(MNF) against Seahawks, he’ll be dancing around with holding football too long and BOOM got sack!

  17. You guys get so concerned over these NFL contracts. The Rams just proved the salary cap means nothing. They paid everybody and their brother, even Goff, who is gone, and still won the SB, so much for crippling your franchise for years to come.

  18. Just because Cleveland has stupid ownership doesn’t mean the rest of the league needs to follow suit

  19. Which ever way you cut it, it’s still a stupid deal for a 33 year old, who has been getting worse over the last 2 years.
    Not sure why the Bronco’s committed to a new contract when he has 2 years left and would be 35 by the end of that

  20. unckleruckus says:
    September 1, 2022 at 10:18 am
    Are you serious!? You’re just going to overlook the fact that Russell Wilson at 33 is 7 YEARS OLDER than Watson??? Are you implying age doesn’t matter in these deals? No way ANY ream is going to give a 33 year old QB a long term guaranteed deal, and I’m sure Russ and his team didn’t even demand a fully guaranteed deal.

    I don’t agree. Wilson might be 33 but he is a proven winner, even if that was several years ago. He took the team to 2 Super Bowls and won one of them. At this point, Watson is what – a proven “pretty good” player with huge baggage? In the grand scheme of things 33 doesn’t appear to be old for a QB any more. That was 12 years ago for Brady, and Rodgers has been lighting up the regular season for the last couple years at 37 – 38 years old. Stafford also just won his 1st SB last year at age 33 so a good QB on the right team can still make things happen.
    Time will tell what Wilson has left in the tank. It’ll be interesting to see which contract looks worse down the road, Wilson’s or Watson’s.

  21. The Seahawks could have waited one more year to do the trade, but given how much money Russell was going to want, they knew he wasn’t going to be a Seahawk for his entire career. Denver wanted him bad and was willing to give up a lot to get him. Obviously, getting the extension done now helps Denver plan out the rest of their roster, for years to come.

    I, as a fan of Russell’s, send congratulations to him on getting his extension & wish him well. Thanks for all he did for the Seahawks, the last decade.

    I’m glad it wasn’t a fully guaranteed contract. Because Russell was often linked to getting a percentage of the Cap, I wonder if there are Cap triggers for renegotiation?

  22. The Seahawks could have waited one more year to do the trade, but given how much money Russell was going to want, they knew he wasn’t going to be a Seahawk for his entire career.
    ==================

    That would have put them at a real disadvantage as the other team would know they were against a wall.

    Also, his skills are deteriorating. A bad year would have been a major problem.

  23. Stop with the obsolete contract nonsense. If you think you may deserve more in 3 years then sign a 3 year deal. All things being equal talent wise With supporting cast Wilson in where I would go all in. Seattle rarely gave him enough talent on offense and when they did he took them all the way.

  24. This is the rest of the league correcting the error by the Browns. They are showing that the fully guaranteed deal Watson got was an anomaly by a desperate owner. Who by the way pissed off the other 31 owners when he did it.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.