Bruce Allen will testify before the House Oversight Committee on Tuesday

New York Giants v Washington Redskins
Getty Images

Things had gotten eerily quiet regarding the Congressional investigation of the Washington Commanders in the weeks since owner Daniel Snyder gave more than 10 hours of deposition testimony in late July. The quiet ends today.

Former Washington executive Bruce Allen will testify before the House Oversight Committee at 11:30 a.m., via Mark Maske of the Washington Post.

It will be a deposition, not an open hearing. Allen is appearing subject to a subpoena, which means that he won’t be able to invoke any potential confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements, contracts, etc.

“The Committee is continuing to investigate the decades-long workplace misconduct at the Washington Commanders and the NFL’s failure to address it,” a spokesperson explained, per Maske. “Mr. Allen served in senior roles under team owner Dan Snyder for many years, so his testimony is important for the Committee to fully understand these serious issues and advance reforms to protect workers in the future.”

Surprisingly, there was no bluster or leaks from the Committee regarding Snyder’s testimony, no public squabbles over whether he complied or told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. It’s still not known what he said.

Allen has managed to avoid much if any scrutiny for years of dysfunction within the organization. Snyder quite possibly blamed, while testifying, plenty of the issues on Allen. If so, it would make plenty of sense for the Committee to hear from Allen. Especially since he may tell a very different story than Snyder did.

The clock continues to tick on the Committee’s investigation. An election is coming. All seats in the House of Representatives are up for grabs. If the Republican retake control of the chamber, the investigation ends.

But it’s not ending today. And Allen’s testimony could potentially give the probe even more fuel, especially if Allen contradicts his former boss on one or more key points.

9 responses to “Bruce Allen will testify before the House Oversight Committee on Tuesday

  1. The committee’s hearings or “investigation” are something of a sham. Their purpose was to get publicity for the chairwoman who was in a tough re-election primary in NYC. She lost to another member of Congress, pretty badly at that. The NFL was never under the committee’s jurisdiction, this should have been handled by the Commerce committee which oversees private businesses.

  2. Hopefully they will ask if anyone was copied on the Gruden emails. That would be fun.

  3. Congress really doesn’t care one iota about anything like this. They are purely acting in the interest of getting publicity for themselves. However, this could erupt into a war between Snyder and Bruce Allen, which could cause a whole lot of publicity for all of them. Which might be more interesting than watching Snyder’s football team.

  4. Yes, but will Ron Rivera want to fine his boss for being a “distraction” like he did to Jack Del Rio?

  5. I guess it helps that they’re used to dealing with liars and scumbags! Bruce will fit right in!

  6. This is sad. They’re playing around with real people’s lives and don’t give a hoot if the wrong guy gets caught in a snare. Like Gruden did. By the way, whoever leaked those emails should be in prison. If they’re not going after the obvious criminals, then this whole thing is a sham.

  7. “Surprisingly, there was no bluster or leaks from the Committee regarding Snyder’s testimony, no public squabbles over whether he complied or told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. It’s still not known what he said.”
    ———–

    Probably because there were no issues with his answers and nothing he said was newsworthy. In other words, another “Al Capone’s Vault.”

    “Seems like we struck out”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.