It’s time to push back the trade deadline, again

NFL: AUG 25 Preseason - Chiefs at Bears
Getty Images

Ten years ago, the NFL moved the trade deadline from the Tuesday after Week Six to the Tuesday after Week Eight. Last year, the NFL expanded the season from 17 weeks to 18. Thus, it’s time to move the trade deadline again.

At a minimum, it should move to Week Nine. At most, it should go even deeper into the regular season.

Why prevent teams from doing arm’s-length transactions with an arbitrary deadline that comes before some potential sellers are ready to admit they need to sell? As more game are played and more teams lose, they possibly would be more willing to fold the tents and do a deal.

Why shouldn’t they be allowed to do it? What’s wrong with free enterprise? What’s the harm in allowing trades to happen deep into the regular season?

If a contender wants to sacrifice future assets in an eff-them-picks all-in play to capture a Super Bowl, so be it. If a bad team hopes to dangle a great player or two in exchange for draft selections that will help the bad team get better, why not let them? In a league premised on parity, nothing smoothes out competitive disparities more than letting the haves give up too much to get players they want from the have-nots.

Really, there’s no compelling argument against allowing trades to happen well after Week Eight other than “it’s always been this way.” It doesn’t have to be this way. There could be a better way, with more drama and intrigue flowing from a deadline that arrives when the line between contender and pretender is far brighter.

So move it back, NFL. Or give us a better reason than “it was like that when I got here.”

58 responses to “It’s time to push back the trade deadline, again

  1. I guess it makes too much sense for the NFL to wrap their heads around. Florio should head up some kind of NFL advisory committee. And NFL decision-makers should be required to read Playmakers.

  2. I don’t know. Why shouldn’t teams be forced to with the team they put together in the offseason? Why allow trades in season?

  3. I’d like to see a rule that says only draft picks from the next draft can be traded, not any draft picks from the following year(s). A dumb trade could cripple a team for years.

  4. OK, why even have a trade deadline at all then Mike? This is ultimately what you want anyway because you want to move the goal post continually, correct? I know you would love to have the NFL function like the NBA salary wise, but basketball and football are two completely different animals, sorry.

    It is fine how it is now and injuries will always happen at the most inopportune time. This is unavoidable and we’re looking at week nine this weekend, so by having a trade deadline it draws a line in the sand and it forces teams to decide if a run at the championship is possible or mabey a team will just wait until next year to make their run. Some teams want to wait until the last minute or just hum and haw around for 9 weeks and then complain because they were caught oof guard by injuries and the trade deadline. It’s also a good thing where it’s at because you can see which team front offices are squared away hungry to win and which teams are just going through the motions existing for the sole purpose of a revenue check.

  5. Here at midway through the season there’s still a lot of teams that think they have a shot at the playoffs. In a couple weeks time there’ll be a little more clarity and a lot more McCaffrey type trades would take place. Not that Carolina is in any way, shape, or form, tanking. you know…

  6. Um, the more you push it back, the more you incentives tanking, which the league is directly opposed to…

  7. I can think of two arguments in favor. 1. Ithelpsprevent really bad GMs like Doug Whaley from further screwing up their teams 2. Trades are maybe not as good for long term fan engagement as are great players who can be marketed as a connection to a specific team/fan base. I do not know if it is an accurate statement, but I do know that I am not the only person who does not give a hoot about the NBA in part because the comparatively massive player movement gets in the way of believing I have a connection to a team and its players. And I don’t have a problem bad-mouthing a different professional sports league. NFL marketing relies on rivalries. Roster continuity feeds that myth. Short term benefits are small.

  8. 1/3 of teams unloading at the deadline is total trash in my opinion. Winners then hire rent-a-players for a couple of months to make SB runs; losing teams purposely fold. This means that a much larger portion of games will be totally meaningless—why even watch? Gambling becomes harder to sniff out. Some losing teams might be inclined to alter playoff landscape to harm a specific enemy too.

    Let’s think about it from the player’s perspective. That’s a lot more players whose life gets upended mid-season. That would give teams more leverage in contract negotiations, also.

    There have been many a team who did a 180 at mid-season. Fans would get robbed of these stories.

    IMO, the NFL should go in the opposite direction Florio is pointing. Disincentivize losing… have a weighted lottery to determine draft position. The argument against is that winners could get richer (the extended trade deadline does exactly that). Furthermore, the salary cap would factor into a draft lottery stacking teams, making it less likely.

  9. The NFL would be wise to pull back. The trade deadline is just one example of the destruction of the legitimacy of the regular season for the sake of more playoff teams (many who don’t belong in the playoffs at all). The league is over-exposed. For the past few years, many (if not most) of the Monday and Thursday night games have been particularly poor, the announcers struggle to make them interesting simply because they are not. The London games are less a curiosity and more of an annoyance–there will not be an NFL team based in Europe and it was ridiculous nonsense to think so in the first place. Go back to 14 games–make the regular season MATTER again. Weeks 15-17 have become a lot of sleepwalking and draft position posturing. Reduce the salary cap but increase the roster size–give more players an opportunity and more people get a bite of the financial apple. You’ll see more aggressive football all year long. Throw out the irrelevant Pro Bowl and instead create a preseason tournament that provides the winner with a real incentive (like an extra 1st round draft choice). We don’t need more football just for the sake of it, or for the advertisers or the casinos. That is not what football is about. What we need is better football, with all the hard hits, tough play, and heroics worthy of the greatest sport of all time.

  10. “Why prevent teams from doing arm’s-length transactions with an arbitrary deadline that comes before some potential sellers are ready to admit they need to sell?”

    Because then any team thats poised to make a deep playoff run (for example the #1 seed) could just trade their entire draft class to buy a championship from a team that’s eager to sell low to gain an entire draft class (for example the worst team) and it would cheapen a championship. It’s different to go all in during preseason or midseason. For example, if the Eagles sold out for a championship this year by trading a bunch of dragt picks at mid season it would be a big gamble. Not a big gamble if they end up as the #1 seed. It could even result in bad teams trading their good players to a team just to help them beat their rival. It wiuld cheapen wins if the trade deadline got too late.

  11. The deadline is where it is because at this point in the season no team is mathematically eliminated from the playoffs, nor is it possible for one to be. Imagine a scenario where at Week 17, a contender short a few pieces deals with an eliminated team with hefty veteran contracts to rid itself of that’s willing to give them up for peanuts. It would drastically alter the makeup of the league in a way that discourages player development and encourages trying to buy a Super Bowl berth at the eleventh hour. No fun.

  12. I think it just doesn’t make for very compelling football to be honest. You want ‘team’ to mean something more than ‘the guys we got this week’ to say nothing of time to learn the system and the plays

  13. I have always thought that once the season starts trades should be forbidden. Play the season with the team you put together in training camp.

  14. If you give teams more time to determine that they’re pretenders I’d expect a lot more teams to tank by selling off their players for picks, and that would deteriorate the entertainment that comes with parity. Keeping the trade deadline early ensures that some bad teams at minimum have good players for the second half of the season keeping them dangerous against the teams who know they’re contenders.

  15. It’s the same reason why fantasy teams aren’t allowed to trade past a certain point in the season. Some teams just give up and unload all of the talent they have. Pushing the deadline back gives teams more of an opportunity to tank. Keeping the deadline where it is ensures excitement up till the final minutes. Thus creating opportunities for money. This website benefits from it heavily, not sure why you’d want to bite the hand that feeds you.

  16. just cancel regular season play and allow the teams to reassemble in the post season.

  17. Some good points made by Florio here… But its almost like hes saying there should be NO trade deadline, and I cant get on board with that… At SOME point, it should be cut off and you are what you are, as far as trades go… Clearly you can always sign a fee agent but I like that there’s a trade deadline, it just should be pushed back a couple weeks.

  18. How about just preventing rental players that if were traded have no cap implications. It happens in hockey where to good teams get good players cheap. That is not what team sports are about.

  19. The trade deadline should only be moved back if the NFL can study other leagues and then move to a 12 rd draft and higher salary cap. Capping QB, DBs and WR salaries would also help. League is not working.

  20. Florio, its not very often I see things from your point of view, but your spot on this article. I’m all for free enterprise, and think it would be a good idea to push back the trade deadline, lets say til the end of Week 14, after the last bye week.

  21. While I agree a deadline after week 9 or even 10 would be cool, I think you could argue that parity IS the reason for not moving it. When bad teams give up their best players to the better teams, those better teams become even better yet. Logically that would lead to the better teams remaining better for at least the following year while the bad teams remained bad while they attempt to rebuild. So you’d have less parity the following year and it *could* start snowballing.

  22. I think the trade deadline is fine as it is. I don’t think it is “broke” so why fix it?

  23. Because you wanna try avoid teams throwing the season and losing for next year’s quarterback? Not much different then dolphins trying pay a coach to lose if your purposely dismantling your team because your out of contention.

  24. Totally agree. “Because I said so” was a lousy excuse as a kid, and it doesn’t get much better as an adult.

  25. It’s amazing how many self-imposed rules in professional sports restricts greater excitement. If pushing the trade deadline generates more excitement (aka money), they should do it in a heartbeat.

  26. The NFL will not help good teams get better and bad teams tank because parity is important to the product on the field. If “any given Sunday” is important, the trade deadline stays where it is.

  27. What’s the harm in allowing trades to happen deep into the regular season?…
    ________________

    The potential harm is the bad team trading its good players causes the fans of that team to lose interest for the remainder of the season. Such trades lead to lower attendance, lower viewership, etc. An early deadline discourages these types of trades.

  28. Disagree. Pushing it back will allow the sellers to be more aggressive, which will make tanking more obvious, which hurts the game (which I think you’ve argued).

  29. There has to be a cutoff right?
    Imagine the trades that would happen a week before the playoffs and how unfair it would be for a premier RB/WR/DE/TE to go to team then. I don’t know what the right week is ,but I know weeks 14-17 seem wrong.

    Example Cardinals decide it is rebuild time and put Deandre Hopkins on the trading block week 15 or the Steelers trade Watt-What if one team mortgages the future for both of them?

  30. Leave the current date in place, or move it back a week or two. Moving it forward would only incentivize teams to take free agency and the draft less seriously. For me, part of the game is how good a team’s scouting and off-season strategizing are. Past a certain point making games easier also makes them less challenging and enjoyable to watch. If you can endlessly tweak your team all season long than that rewards laziness and lack of imagination in the spring.

  31. Disagree. Strongly! If a team doesn’t know how good they are by week 5, let alone week 8, then that is a clear sign that team management is sub par. You don’t provide a handicap to the people who shouldn’t have the job in the first place. By week 9 or 10 even the average fan can make a buy or sell decision.

  32. People keep mentioning “tanking” like it is just some thing that happens in sports. Um, no it doesn’t. Tanking makes absolutely no sense. It would get everybody fired, especially the head coach. Why would a head coach tank so some other coach reaps the reward of the so-called tanking? Also, think about the free agents from the tanking team trying to get a new contract. Why would a player tank knowing they want the highest amount of money on their next contract? Does that even make sense? Of course it doesn’t.

  33. Yeah, strategy and personel management have no place in the NFL. Sheesh, leave the game alone already.

  34. I’m fine with the deadline staying as is, but I’d also be ok with moving it back 1 week at the max so that it’s at least at the halfway point of the season. I’m against moving it any farther than after week 9 though. I don’t want some team bringing in a bunch of new players week 12 or later just to make a superbrowl or playoff run.

  35. cruzcowboy says:
    November 1, 2022 at 10:34 pm
    Or leave it as is and quit crying.
    ____________

    Not a single person is crying about it.

  36. Simple answer why NOT to do it is, to prevent collusion. Moving the date to close to the playoffs, or not having a deadline at all, would allow teams to collude and set-up one team to win the SuperBowl. But the more complex answer that goes along with that is, Sports betting would be a nightmare if the trade deadline were to close to the playoffs or if no deadline existed at all.

  37. sellingadream says:
    November 2, 2022 at 10:05 am

    Disagree. Strongly! If a team doesn’t know how good they are by week 5, let alone week 8, then that is a clear sign that team management is sub par. You don’t provide a handicap to the people who shouldn’t have the job in the first place. By week 9 or 10 even the average fan can make a buy or sell decision.
    ====================================================
    The Giants won the super bowl after losing 5 consecutive games in that season. The Bucs in Tom Brady’s 1st year with them were 7-5 before winning all the rest of their games, including the super bowl just a few years ago. This disproves your point completely, IMO.

  38. “There could be a better way, *with more drama and intrigue* flowing from a deadline that arrives when the line between contender and pretender is far brighter.”

    And that highlighted section shows who benefits from this idea: sports media. That in itself is a reason to kill the proposal, if not to go in the opposite direction.

  39. sellingadream says:
    November 2, 2022 at 10:05 am

    Disagree. Strongly! If a team doesn’t know how good they are by week 5, let alone week 8, then that is a clear sign that team management is sub par. You don’t provide a handicap to the people who shouldn’t have the job in the first place. By week 9 or 10 even the average fan can make a buy or sell decision.
    ————————————————————
    The Giants won the super bowl after losing 5 consecutive games in that season. The Bucs in Tom Brady’s 1st year with them were 7-5 before winning all the rest of their games, including the super bowl just a few years ago. So it really isn’t that obvious even after 12 weeks into the season.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.