Commanders: “No evidence” security deposits were intentionally withheld

NFL: SEP 25 Eagles at Commanders
Getty Images

On Thursday, D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine filed a lawsuit against the Commanders for allegedly withholding security deposits from season-ticket holders. The team has responded.

And, like virtually anyone who is ever sued for anything, the Commanders are not saying, “Yep, we did it.”

“The team has not accepted security deposits for over 20 years in the case of premium tickets and over a decade in the case of suites, and we began returning them to season ticket holders as early as 2004,” a team spokesperson said. “In 2014, as part of a comprehensive review, team management was instructed to send notices to over 1,400 customers with deposits and return all security deposits requested.

“Further, the team engaged an outside law firm and forensic auditors to conduct an extensive review of the team’s accounts, which found no evidence that the team intentionally withheld security deposits that should have been returned to customers or that the team improperly converted any unclaimed deposits to revenue.”

Something doesn’t add up. If this was all taken care of in 2014, why were letters recently sent in an effort to distribute refunds? Also, the use of the term “requested” implies that the team only provided refunds when refunds affirmatively were requested.

Also, the issue isn’t intentional withholding. It’s whether the team intentionally (or perhaps negligently) failed to take appropriate steps to pay the money back.

Finally, we don’t put much stock in the opinion of an “outside law firm and forensic auditors” hired by the team. Those folks tend to find a way to tell their client whatever they think their client wants to hear.

We have a feeling this one is just getting started. Civil lawsuits are possible. Other attorneys general possibly will take action. Federal prosecutors could poke around, too.

Regardless, it just feels like there’s an issue here. People pay money. They forget they paid it. The party that received it nonchalantly takes no action. It’s tempting, and it’s easy.

Whether or not that actually happened remains to be seen.

12 responses to “Commanders: “No evidence” security deposits were intentionally withheld

  1. It’s pretty simple, I’ll buy this story as soon as season ticket holders start saying on social media that they were shorted in some way. So far we haven’t heard from them.

  2. I live in a DC suburb. To get on that list, it required a deposit. I’ve heard from many a fan that their deposits were never returned. DC had a 20 year wait for season tickets. Snyder has created a no wait scheme here.

  3. It’s pretty simple, I’ll put it this way. I’ll believe that the mega million-dollar business didn’t try to cheat the masses, after an independent in-depth investigation from the DA clears the organization.

  4. If they know who these people are and apparently have their address why not just send them their refund?

  5. By saying, “No evidence security deposits were intentionally withheld,” the Commanders mean, “We believe we have successfully hidden or destroyed any evidence security deposits were intentionally withheld.”

  6. RamblinRandall says:
    November 17, 2022 at 9:44 pm
    Somebody is paying to smear Snyder with a steady flow of hearsay and misinformation
    ________________

    Interesting. Who is making these payments? Which allegations against Snyder do you consider to be hearsay or misinformation?

  7. Do they still have a waiting list for tickets? If not, there shouldn’t be any deposits remaining. Or perhaps the people who paid long ago can’t now be found or have died. That doesn’t make their deposit money the property of the Commanders but it would explain the lack of request for a refund. If there is still a wait for tickets in various categories, the authorities should check to see if people on the list got jumped by others who paid later. That would also be fraud.

  8. This desperate witch hunt will be over in Jan 2023. However, it will be fun till then creating circumstantial evidence that serious crimes have been committed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.