Patrick Mahomes calls Travis Kelce “greatest tight end of all time”

Kansas City Chiefs v Los Angeles Chargers
Getty Images

Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce caught three touchdown passes from Patrick Mahomes in Kansas City’s dramatic win in Los Angeles on Sunday night, and afterward Mahomes had high praise for Kelce.

“Travis, I mean, it’s Travis, greatest tight end of all time, he makes plays like that to win games,” Mahomes said.

If he’s not the greatest, Kelce is on the list with Tony Gonzalez, Antonio Gates, Rob Gronkowski, Mike Ditka, Ozzie Newsome, John Mackey and Shannon Sharpe. Mahomes says what sets Kelce apart is how much his competitive nature and work ethic inspire the rest of the team.

“He just competes,” Mahomes said. “He’s gonna keep fighting until the very end. When you see that, not only is it impressive for him, but it gets other guys going. Like I said, he’s one of the best if not the best tight end of all time, but he’s coming to work every day to get better. So that shows you, whenever you step in the facility, you’re like, ‘Man, I’ve got to get to work, if this guy is doing that, I have to at least match that.'”

Mahomes said Kelce is the one tight end he’d trust to win a one-on-one matchup with Chargers safety Derwin James.

“If he’s man to man, I’m gonna give him a chance, and he’s gonna win most of them,” Mahomes said. “They’ve got Derwin, Derwin is going to win his battles because he’s probably the best safety in the league, but I’m going to give him a chance because I know how great he is.”

75 responses to “Patrick Mahomes calls Travis Kelce “greatest tight end of all time”

  1. What’s been the biggest difference in the success between Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes? Mahomes has had a top 3 all-time TE in his prime for his entire career and Buffalo hasn’t had a good TE in decades.

  2. Kelsey…,without doubt… is the most dangerous TE in the history of the NFL.
    Bills fan here, who has witnessed Gronks best for years…

  3. There is always going to be a debate on who the greatest tIght end is. You easily could go with Kielce, Gronk or Tony Gonzalez greatest.

  4. Kelce is actually very good and is doing it with a team player QB instead of a “my way or highway” level of cheater.

  5. Kelce is just a wide receiver most of the time. But since he is called a tight end, then it’s true he will be among the greatest to play that position.

  6. Can he block? Or is that why you need to put other tight ends on the field with him at the same time?

  7. Casca’s friend says:
    November 21, 2022 at 5:27 am
    Gronk > Kelce But it’s *this* close.

    *******

    No, it’s not.

  8. Mahomes never played with Gronk. I’m not taking away from Kelce at all, but Gronk is the GOAT of tight ends. Kelce a very close second, in my opinion.

  9. Kelce is a large wide receiver. He can’t block so why do we continue to call him a tight end? Gronk dominated in all aspects of the game, NO it isn’t close.

  10. Today’s tight ends can run free without being touched off the line of scrimmage so you can’t compare them to the old tight ends!

  11. Maybe clarify receiving te. His blocking isn’t as good as more then a few of his contemporaries. He’s not the best COMPLETE the. He is better then Shannon Sharpe though.

  12. Mahomes is partially right. Kelce is an outstanding receiver, and great RAC. However he is more of a wide receiver than a tight end. True outstanding tight ends (Gronk/Mark Bavaro) spent a lot of time in the trenches. They were tremendous blockers along with being outstanding pass catchers.

  13. He isn’t Gronk, but I think Kelce is making a pretty compelling case for the hall of fame. hes probably first ballot when its all said and done.

  14. Great player but Kelce is more of a wide receiver. Show me when he blocks at an elite level.

  15. A tight end is supposed to do more than catch passes, and sure, it’s easily arguable that Kelce is the best or amongst the best at his position to ever do that.
    But they’re also required to block, otherwise you’re just a larger wide receiver. And Kelce isn’t even an average blocker. That dual role is what makes the position so valuable, because they can have a tremendous impact on a play even when they don’t have the ball in their hands.
    And that’s why Kelce isn’t the greatest TE of all time, he’s one dimensional, regardless of how exemplary that one dimension is.

  16. Pats removed him every time.

    Kelce doesn’t block. Gronk is clearly better. Kelce is one of these players who produces but no one can remember a play on his highlight reel.

  17. If only pass catching/route running counted then sure Kelce but there’s more to that. Gronk is the greatest TE in history, period, because he could catch/run routes with the best but he also was just as good blocking. Kelce should be considered a WR because he never blocks!

  18. Gronk was a great blocker, and when he did get the ball, it took a lot of guys to bring him to the ground, if they even could. Kelce is not a great blocker. He’s a great pass catcher and has some great moves, so he has that going for him. Gronk was a complete player, not just a “give me the ball” TE.

  19. Keyboard warriors out this morning. The dude leads the league in TD’s, and you think he should block more, just to be considered the best? Shows why none of you are calling plays. We’d give him the ball and score, but we want him to block for lesser talent….

  20. Kelce is definitely making a case. My only argument is how he has often been taken out of the game in the biggest games due to defensive physical play, vs Gronk, who has been the best player on the field in the toughest circumstances against the best defenses.

  21. When anyone dominates the TE position from blocking to receiving the way Gronk dominated for years, then get back to me. Kelce is a good TE, but he’s not at the level of Gronk, Gonzalez or Winslow.

  22. In addition to my previous comment, Kelce’s ability to stay on the field is super impressive.

  23. 60ftlesbianoctopus says:
    November 21, 2022 at 5:33 am
    What’s been the biggest difference in the success between Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes? Mahomes has had a top 3 all-time TE in his prime for his entire career and Buffalo hasn’t had a good TE in decades.

    ———————————–

    Yeah, no. The biggest difference is that Patrick Mahomes is a generational QB, and Josh Allen is just a really good one.

    Really just that simple.

  24. Mark Bavaro was a better blocker than Gronk.

    Guess that makes him the best TE ever?..

  25. “But he can’t block” is the most ridiculous argument ever.

    You haters actually think he’s built a first ballot HOF career as a TE by not being able to block? I guess all the Gronk fans have to have something to hang onto while watching Travis blow past their guy.

  26. Kelce doesn’t block. Gronk is clearly better. Kelce is one of these players who produces but no one can remember a play on his highlight reel.
    ============

    And Gronk couldn’t put up Kelces numbers, or command constant double or triple coverage.

  27. It’s cute seeing the Chiefs dynasty homers come together to defend Pat’s words. Kelce is no doubt great, but the GOAT conversation at any position is meritless without context.

  28. A tight end is supposed to do more than catch passes, and sure, it’s easily arguable that Kelce is the best or amongst the best at his position to ever do that.
    ===========

    Sure, for smashmouth teams.

    Andy Reid would pass every down if he could. The last thing he need is some slow motion, lumbering 265lber.

    All this talk the Chiefs would fly off the rails without Tyreek Hill. Looks like it was Kelce all along. How many offenses had a TE as their centerpeice? This is the first one I’ve seen.

  29. He is not a complete tight end so no he is not the greatest. He may be one of the most dangerous ones with his YAC but greatest, nope. Also I’d add Bavaro to that list.

  30. Because 50% of the TE position is blocking then it has to be Gronk !! Sorry Pat it’s a fact. Also Gronk 4 Rings Travis 1 .

  31. Rings? LOL.

    Guess its Ron Kramer then. 5 Titles, and the only TE to 3-peat.

  32. It’s always difficult to single out the greatest player at one position. But as of YAC, in crunch time, to directly impact the outcome of a game, Kelce is quite unique.

  33. Kelce and Gronk are both 33. Gronk has missed, who knows, how many seasons due to injury.

    Gronk TD: 93
    Kelce TD: 68

    Gronk SB Rings:4 or 5? Whatever, its a lot

    Kelce: 1…..

    Game over Kelce. You lose. God Day.

  34. pittsburghdamned says:
    November 21, 2022 at 12:03 pm
    Well he’s definitely the most obnoxious, so there’s that.

    Ever heard of his charity? 87 and Running Foundation. That “obnoxious” person is doing a lot for kids.

  35. Gronk is the greatest tight end of all time, and it’s not even close. In both of Brady’s playoff wins against the Chiefs, he made clutch plays. Where was Kelce in Super Bowl LV? Gronk made key plays against the Seahawks and Rams as well. Plus, he actually blocks. Four rings is just the tip of the iceberg.

  36. Lol Mahomes is obviously going to say this, but y’all don’t need to agree. A classic tight end NEEDS to be able to run block, otherwise he is a glorified wide receiver.

    So many tight ends in the past have been great receivers and brought huge value to their teams, but not many of them brought the true TE dual threat like Gronk did. He was essentially another Offensive lineman on the field for running plays, Kelce has never even came close to that.

    So if it’s arguable (maybe) that Kelce is a very slightly better receiver than Gronk, but Gronk is 100 times better than him at blocking, then Gronk gets the edge and Kelce takes a back seat.

    You guys should be comparing Kelce to Tony G or Witten, not to Gronk. It’s not even close.

  37. “Gronk SB Rings:4 or 5? Whatever, its a lot”

    ———————————-

    Pretty sure he didn’t win those by himself. SB rings have nothing to do with individual stat comparisons.

  38. Kelce is incredible at what he does… as a slot receiver. He’s listed as a tight end because he is big, but it ends there.

  39. And what did anyone think he’d say? JEEEZ I’d bet he’d say Reid is the greatest HC of all time too!

    Fact of the matter is when you’ve only played with 1 how do you truly know?

    Top 5 definitely, best ever I’m not so sure, I’d have to say Gronk, Kelce #2.

    But I do know one thing for sure, the Chiefs sure looked a whole lot better with Hill than they do without him!

  40. To be fair, Kelce doesn’t block because he risks losing some gold chains during any contact.

  41. legionofzoom says:
    November 21, 2022 at 12:30 pm
    “Gronk SB Rings:4 or 5? Whatever, its a lot”

    ———————————-

    Pretty sure he didn’t win those by himself. SB rings have nothing to do with individual stat comparisons.
    ===================

    They don’t, then why is that what all QBs a judged by? They don’t win SBs all by themselves either but all too often that what get’s them into the HoF like Eli, if it wouldn’t be for the 2 SBs he’d never get in the HoF with his record and someone(like me) could argue that it was the Giants great D that won them those 2 SBs, they held the Pats team that averaged over 30PPG to 17 and 14 points and Eli didn’t have a damn thing to do with that!

  42. Such nonsense. Kelce doesn’t block much because that’s hardly ever his role on the play. It’s not because he “can’t block”. It’s just not how Reid has ever used his TE1 position.

  43. haha..amusing how the entire history of the NFL is ignored for gaudy stats. I won’t bother to name all the HOF players who played TE and were complete football players, since you folks don’t care about history.

    I think Kielce is a fabulous receiver…one of the best. But c’mon. GOAT requires a much longer view than current fans care to admit.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.