As promised, NFLPA files collusion claim over guaranteed contracts

NFL: FEB 01 Super Bowl LII Preview - NFLPA Press Conference
Getty Images

On October 18, NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith strongly hinted that a collusion claim was coming regarding the refusal of teams to give veteran players fully-guaranteed contracts. Within 48 hours after Smith’s remarks, the NFL made it known that the collusion bird had landed.

Kalyn Kahler of TheAthletic.com reports that, in a memo dated October 20, NFL general counsel Jeff Pash informed the league’s teams of the union’s formal allegation that the teams had agreed to not make fully-guaranteed contracts available to “certain quarterbacks” after the Browns gave Deshaun Watson a five-year, fully-guaranteed contract.

The collusion claim, based on Pash’s memo, contends that NFL owners and/or executives discussed at an August 9 ownership meeting not agreeing to additional player contracts with fully-guaranteed salaries. The union will need to prove that something along those lines happened; otherwise, the league will simply argue that the teams independently decided that they wouldn’t follow Cleveland’s lead.

The memo also notes that the NFLPA is not exercising its right to attempt to terminate the Collective Bargaining Agreement, if a violation is proven. (Former NFL player Sean Gilbert once ran for the position of executive director based in part on a plan to attempt to scrap the CBA based on collusion arising from the teams hiding behind the funding rule to refuse to give players fully-guaranteed deal.)

Since Watson signed his deal with the Browns, players like Kyler Murray of the Cardinals and Russell Wilson of the Broncos have gotten long-term deals that aren’t fully guaranteed. It didn’t seem to be a major sticking point for either of them. For Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson, it has prevented a deal from being done.

Jackson wants a fully-guaranteed deal. The Ravens refuse to give it to him. The question in the collusion claim will be whether the teams and/or the league office have discouraged other teams from doing what the Browns did.

The union obviously believes there’s smoke. The challenge becomes finding the fire. In a later post, I’ll lay out some of the possible ways that the union may go about trying to prove it.

51 responses to “As promised, NFLPA files collusion claim over guaranteed contracts

  1. Compensation is based on value. Value is based upon results. If you suck (Wilson), or are unable to contribute to your team’s success (value), why would you expect to get paid? A better option is a injury buyout based upon come reasonable metric. I can’t think of a job where you get paid for just showing up (unless maybe you worked for Twitter), or, for not showing up. If for any reason I am unable to work, I don’t get paid. Any nobody cares why I can’t work. For what I pay for my season tickets – I want positive results from every player on my team, period.

  2. Every team should forfeit a first round pick.

    Teams with 2 can keep one.

    First round will be 4 picks.

    Second round resumes at pick 5 with Houston.

  3. Fully guaranteed contracts are a terribly bad decision for teams. Great for the player, but a bad business decision for the team. But, Cleveland is known for bad decisions.

  4. Deshaun Watson continuing to cause problems for just about everyone despite not having played for almost two years. A truly brilliant trade and contract from the Browns.

  5. Collusion between NFL owners is a lot like collusion with Russia and certain politicians. It’s very obviously happening, but next to impossible to prove

  6. Making the case for collusion is ridiculous when in reality it’s just 31 other team is realizing that the Browns are fools. Same as it’s ever been.

  7. It’s going to be an uphill battle for the NFLPA. Winks and nods don’t leave much evidence.

  8. Why would it make sense to give somebody a fully guaranteed contract? These qbs get guaranteed enough money to support multiple generations. The only teams that fully guarantee a top of the market contract are desperate, embarrassing franchises like the Browns. The only time it makes sense is if said qb leaves significant money on the table to benefit the team, which rarely happens.

  9. “Truly brilliant trade and contract”

    Oof… hasn’t played in 2 years… that’s never gone well. Like ever. Not just hasn’t played in the NFL. Hasn’t played football at game speed in 2 years. This could be a brilliant trade, or it could be an albatross contract for the Browns. It’s more of a risk than you’re giving it credit for.

  10. In a gladiator sport like football, the concept of fully guaranteed contracts is beyond idiotic for any team for any player. I can argue that fully guaranteed contracts in any sport are idiotic.

  11. The reference to the August 9 meeting is oddly specific. Either the NFLPA knows something, or wants to give the impression that they know something.

    For the purposes of NOT being caught, you would discuss this in person so as to not leave a paper trail (via email). I am curious to see where this goes.

  12. dlw492 says:
    November 22, 2022 at 11:13 am
    Can’t say CONTRACT without CON, and usually there’s one side that gets conned.
    ————————
    Two parties willingly enter into a contract. Who is getting the “CON?” Is it the franchise that makes an offer, or the player who accepts and signs? If you don’t like it, just like any job, move on to something else. Just because a team massively overpays for a player does not mean that the rest of the NFL now has to follow suit.

  13. If all the owners got together and said the same thing in the same place at the same time, perhaps they are all like-minded businessmen. Wouldn’t that be a revelation?

  14. Browns just browned the whole league and a serial predator is to blame… words can’t describe the happiness this brings me

  15. jimcross1957 says:
    November 22, 2022 at 11:19 am
    Fully guaranteed contracts are a terribly bad decision for teams. Great for the player, but a bad business decision for the team. But, Cleveland is known for bad decisions.

    ————————

    Yes to both counts. Fully guaranteed contracts shift the burden of being 100% correct on signing a player on the team and can make a team noncompetitive for years if they miss. Just look at basketball and players like Ben Simmons.

  16. im not opposed to fully guaranteed contracts but if it was me i wouldnt offer anything more than 2 yrs and put a max value on the contract..i.e qbs arent getting more than 30 mil per yr if its guaranteed. easy fix, players get the guarantees and the teams can walk away if the dude doesnt live up to it

  17. The funny part here is that if fully guaranteed contracts become accepted – it will be to the detriment of the vast majority of players. They will end up being awarded only QB and a select few other players. But the result will be less money going to the large majority of the team.

    The pie doesnt get any biger.

  18. Maybe base ball can learn from this but then maybe not. I’m still baffled as to how the Yankee’s gave a 10 year contract to A Rod. After what six years his skills were eroding and yet, they couldnt trade him and he wouldnt retire knowing he would stay and his get money.
    The Mn Wild did the same and are paying two guys a ton of money who arent even on the team anymore and have two years left to do it.
    The NFL is smart to just all say no to guaranteeing all the money. It really hurts the majority of the players like the packers who cant get free agents because one guy is getting all the money

  19. and another thing, if the guy gets cut because he stinks and isnt living up to the contract, his contract is voided. only guarantee is for injury while playing or practicing. stop the free money, and make players earn their checks. maybe they can get these ridiculous bloated salaries under control and make the game more affordable to the average person. after all, the money is ultimately coming from the fans anyway

  20. Ya your at a meeting with your peers and you discuss the fact the Browns gave guaranteed money to one guy and the groups opinion was that was a bad thing to do. That aint collusion if every owner agreed with an opinion that gauranteed contracts were bad business.
    Did they sign an agreement to never to them? Ya right that paper dont exist

  21. There’s t distinct difference between a guaranteed contract being foolish to offer and the idea that the league colluding to prevent it. These teams already throw stupid money and perks at these guys. It seems naive to suggest that offering a guaranteed contract wouldn’t be in the toolbox. Makes lots of sense that like-minded owners would agree not to do it.

  22. It seems really obvious to me that there is a widespread agreement to not give out fully guaranteed contracts.

    When teams are desperately bidding against each other in free agency for that guy they think will put them over the top, you never see it happen or hear about a team throwing out a lower-annual-average-but-fully-guaranteed offer to see if a player will bite.

    There are probably some things the NFLPA could do to make it more likely though. It seems like guaranteed money does some seriously punitive things to a team’s salary cap. For example, I don’t understand why trading a player creates a salary cap hit for the team trading the guy just because he has guaranteed money in his contract. The other team will still be taking on the contract and paying him.

    Maybe in the next CBA, the players union should push for provisions that would make it easier for teams to maneuver around guaranteed money issues for salary-cap purposes. If a player wants specific protections from being traded, his agent can negotiate that separately.

  23. keithmillardloveshardees says:
    November 22, 2022 at 12:03 pm
    If all the owners got together and said the same thing in the same place at the same time, perhaps they are all like-minded businessmen. Wouldn’t that be a revelation?
    _______________

    You cannot get 32 people together and have them say the same thing about any subject, it doesn’t matter if all 32 are the greatest business people who ever existed.

  24. I’m fine with fully guaranteed contracts, as long as they are reasonable and don’t strangle hold teams for years beyond the players departure. Deshaun’s contract goes way beyond reasonable.

  25. austinspencer says:
    November 22, 2022 at 11:50 am
    In a gladiator sport like football, the concept of fully guaranteed contracts is beyond idiotic for any team for any player. I can argue that fully guaranteed contracts in any sport are idiotic.
    _____________

    Thank you for admitting that the players are gladiators. That is actually an argument for guaranteed contracts. The players bodies are being sacrificed for the owners profit and the fans entertainment. Way too many people treat the players as commodity to be used then thrown away.

  26. dartwick says:
    November 22, 2022 at 12:25 pm
    The funny part here is that if fully guaranteed contracts become accepted – it will be to the detriment of the vast majority of players. They will end up being awarded only QB and a select few other players. But the result will be less money going to the large majority of the team.

    The pie doesnt get any biger.
    _______________

    Actually the pie does get bigger, every year. Except for the covid year, the salary cap has increased every year since it was implemented in 1994.

  27. dlw492 says:
    November 22, 2022 at 11:13 am
    Can’t say CONTRACT without CON, and usually there’s one side that gets conned.

    ————-

    And no one forces them to sign…

  28. Thank you for admitting that the players are gladiators. That is actually an argument for guaranteed contracts. The players bodies are being sacrificed for the owners profit and the fans entertainment. Way too many people treat the players as commodity to be used then thrown away.

    ————

    They are CHOOSING to do so in exchange for money. If they don’t like the terms of the money offered, they can go/look elsewhere.

  29. The (dumpster) fire is the Cleveland Browns. One need look no further than that to find where the fire is for the smoke. Stupid contract and not everyone else is going to be as stupid. Only in a world of pro sports and lawyers does that become “collusion” because 31 other people don’t want to be as stupid.

  30. I’m sure the NFL is in a hurry to add them because Fully guaranteed contracts in baseball and basketball have gone so well.

  31. It is reasonable to assume that 31 other teams, having witnessed the disaster that is Watson’s fully guaranteed contract, could conclude individually on their own that fully guaranteed contracts are a terrible idea without any collusion being required.

  32. Simple solution: Eliminate the salary cap. I remember when Washington and Dallas were punished for exceeding the salary cap in the season where there was no salary cap. I think they were punished for conduct detrimental to the league or some nonsense.

  33. Tough one. It’s hard not to see it from both sides. Guess each individual will have to decide for themselves if it matters to them, and each owner will have to weigh the benefit against the possible gain…or loss.

  34. gibson45 says:
    November 22, 2022 at 12:54 pm

    _______________

    “Actually the pie does get bigger, every year. Except for the covid year, the salary cap has increased every year since it was implemented in 1994.”

    Yes that is obvious. The point is that adding guaranteed contracts dont increase the pie size – its just a realocation.

  35. marthisdil says:
    November 22, 2022 at 1:00 pm
    Thank you for admitting that the players are gladiators. That is actually an argument for guaranteed contracts. The players bodies are being sacrificed for the owners profit and the fans entertainment. Way too many people treat the players as commodity to be used then thrown away.

    ————

    They are CHOOSING to do so in exchange for money. If they don’t like the terms of the money offered, they can go/look elsewhere.
    ______________

    Respectfully, you are missing the point. Of course they are choosing to do so. The issue is how they are viewed and treated for doing so.

  36. dartwick says:
    November 22, 2022 at 2:35 pm
    gibson45 says:
    November 22, 2022 at 12:54 pm

    _______________

    “Actually the pie does get bigger, every year. Except for the covid year, the salary cap has increased every year since it was implemented in 1994.”

    Yes that is obvious. The point is that adding guaranteed contracts dont increase the pie size – its just a realocation.
    ____________

    Thanks, appreciate the clarification.

  37. Maybe some kind if hybrid CBA ? Guaranteed contracts Max years can be 3 ? Long contract can only have max 50% max guarantees ?

  38. Collusion? Is it collusion when the owners all realize how incredibly idiotic the Watson comment was? In Florio’s eyes, more than one owner realizing the contract was stupid is collusion rather than it showing they are smart business men.

  39. It’s clearly the Dolphins…let’s punish the Dolphins again and nobody else. Damn Bullies, Tamperers and now collusion. How dare they?

  40. Before ot was even made public, the teams already had way around it. It’s easy to change words without changing anything. Nice try Smith. You lost again. And again…..

  41. The NFL will deny that it has anything to hide while fighting tooth & nail to prevent anyone from seeing their communications.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.